The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Gait speed and survival in older adults.
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Survival estimates help individualize goals of care for geriatric patients, but life tables fail to account for the great variability in survival. Physical performance measures, such as gait speed, might help account for variability, allowing clinicians to make more individualized estimates. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between gait speed and survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pooled analysis of 9 cohort studies (collected between 1986 and 2000), using individual data from 34,485 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older with baseline gait speed data, followed up for 6 to 21 years. Participants were a mean (SD) age of 73.5 (5.9) years; 59.6%, women; and 79.8%, white; and had a mean (SD) gait speed of 0.92 (0.27) m/s. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival rates and life expectancy. RESULTS: There were 17,528 deaths; the overall 5-year survival rate was 84.8% (confidence interval [CI], 79.6%-88.8%) and 10-year survival rate was 59.7% (95% CI, 46.5%-70.6%). Gait speed was associated with survival in all studies (pooled hazard ratio per 0.1 m/s, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.90; P < .001). Survival increased across the full range of gait speeds, with significant increments per 0.1 m/s. At age 75, predicted 10-year survival across the range of gait speeds ranged from 19% to 87% in men and from 35% to 91% in women. Predicted survival based on age, sex, and gait speed was as accurate as predicted based on age, sex, use of mobility aids, and self-reported function or as age, sex, chronic conditions, smoking history, blood pressure, body mass index, and hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis of individual data from 9 selected cohorts, gait speed was associated with survival in older adults.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
43 Own result · 15 Sources not found · 9 Own interpretation · 7 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stratification by sex-specific median height failed to show systematic differences in survival rates between short and tall participants, so results presented are not stratified by height.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In some subsets of slow walkers of Hispanic descent, survival rates were 10% to 20% higher than in other groups (eTable 2).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At age 75, predicted 10-year survival across the range of gait speeds ranged from 19% to 87% in men and from 35% to 91% in women.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stratification by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, black, Hispanic) suggested generally similar survival rates by gait speed among age and sex groups.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed was associated with survival in all studies (pooled hazard ratio per 0.1 m/s, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87–0.90; P<. 001).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The overall HR for survival per each 0.1 m/s faster gait speed was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.90; P<.001) when pooled across all studies using a random-effects meta-analytic statistical approach”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“In this pooled analysis of individual data from 9 selected cohorts, gait speed was associated with survival in older adults.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelationaln = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speeds of 1.0 m/s or higher consistently demonstrated survival that was longer than expected by age and sex alone.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed added substantially37 to age and sex in 7 of the 9 studies and in the pooled analysis.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed, age, and sex yielded a C statistic (0.734) that was not significantly different from age, sex, mobility aids, and functional status (0.732; (P=.95; Table 3).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three studies had sufficiently consistent data on functional status at baseline to allow pooling.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the sample size of very slow walkers was small, our data suggest that there may be a subpopulation who walk very slowly but survive for long periods.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
- It may state two separate claims as one. 40
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Study follow-up time ranged from 6.0 to 21.0 years, with participants followed up for a mean of 12.2 and a median of 13.8 years.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the total, 59.6% were women.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Predicted years of remaining life for each sex and age increased as gait speed increased, with a gait speed of about 0.8 m/s at the median life expectancy at most ages for both sexes (Figure 2; a PDF of enlarged graphs is available at http://www.jama.com).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, there was a wide range of gait speeds, from less than 0.4 m/s (n=1247) to more than 1.4 m/s (n=1491).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plainn = 1,491- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this older adult population, the relationship of gait speed with remaining years of life was consistent across age groups, but the absolute number of expected remaining years of life was larger at younger ages.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 70-year-old men, life expectancy ranged from 7 to 23 years and for women, from 10 to 30 years.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were substantial numbers of African American (n=3852) and Hispanic (n=2650) participants.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plainn = 3,852- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mortality rates appear to be related to length of follow-up (Table 1).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Predicted survival based on age, sex, and gait speed was as accurate as predicted based on age, sex, use of mobility aids, and self-reported function or as age, sex, chronic conditions, smoking history, blood pressure, body mass index, and hospitalization.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In women, the probability of 5-year survival remained greater than 0.5 until advanced age (eFigure 3B), but 10-year survival at age 75 years ranged from 0.34 to 0.92 and at age 80 years from 0.22 to 0.86 (eFigure 4B).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the 3 levels of functional status (independent, difficulty with instrumental ADLs, and dependent in ADLs), the pooled HR per 0.1-m/s increase in gait speed for those who were independent was 0.92 (P= .005), for those with difficulty in instrumental activities was also 0.92 (P<.001) but was 0.94 (P=.02) among those dependent in ADLs.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The studies had a wide age range, including 1765 persons older than 85 years.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plainn = 1,765- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were consistent associations across studies, although given the large sample sizes, Q statistics were often statistically significant (details available in eFigure 1A–M available at http://www.jama.com).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age-adjusted HRs by study ranged from 0.83 to 0.94 and all were significant (P<.001; Figure 1).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When dichotomized at a score of 100 into low and high activity, MrOS had consistent and statistically significant HRs for low (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81–0.88) and high (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84–0.90) physical”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the pooled sample, median survival in years for the age groups 65 through 74 years was 12.6 for men and 16.8 for women; for 75 through 84 years, 7.9 for men and 10.5 for women; and for 85 years or older, 4.6 for men and 6.4 years for women (eTable 3 available at http://www.jama.com).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed was associated with differences in the probability of survival at all ages in both sexes, but was especially informative after age 75 years.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were 17 528 deaths; the overall 5-year survival rate was 84.8% (confidence interval [CI], 79.6%–88.8%)and 10-year survival rate was 59.7% (95%CI, 46.5%–70.6%).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further adjustment for sex, BMI, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, diseases, prior hospitalization, and self-reported health did not change the results (overall HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89–0.91; P<.001).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In men, the probability of 5-year survival at age 85 ranged from 0.3 to 0.88 (eFigure 3A) and the probability of 10-year survival at age 75 years ranged from 0.18 to 0.86 (eFigure 4A).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Survival increased across the full range of gait speeds, with significant increments per 0.1 m/s.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 9 participating studies contributed a total of 34 485 participants (Table 1).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plainn = 34,485- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were 17 528 total deaths across all studies, with rates varying from 18.40% to 91.87% in individual studies.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Hispanic EPESE, the HR for low physical activity was significant (0.92; 95% CI, 0.88–0.96) but the HR for higher physical activity was not (0.99; 95% CI, 0.95–1.04).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pooled HRs for all subgroups except functional status were consistently in the range of 0.81 to 0.92 and all were significant (P<.002).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C statistics for age, sex, and gait speed were greater than those for age, sex, and chronic diseases in 4 of 9 studies, approximately equivalent in 5 studies and inferior in no studies.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 10-year survival, 6 studies had sufficient follow-up time to perform many of the analyses (Table 3).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We assessed usual vs fast gait speed in the single study with both measures (Invecciare in Chianti18 study: usual, 0.727 [95% CI, 0.678–0.776]; fast, 0.684 [95% CI, 0.630–0.739]), suggesting that fast walks did not have an advantage in survival prediction over usual-paced walks.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For these studies, gait speed, age, and sex yielded a C statistic (0.741) that was not significantly different (P=.78) from age, sex, mobility aids, and functional status (P=.75; Table 3).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed added predictive ability to age and sex in 4 of 6 studies and in the pooled analysis.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In our data, predicted life expectancy at the median for age and sex occurs at about 0.8 m/s; faster gait speeds predict life expectancy beyond the median.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gait speed has been recommended as a potentially useful clinical indicator of well-being among the older adults.14”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because physical activity measures were not sufficiently consistent across studies, effects could not be pooled.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed could be considered a simple and accessible summary indicator of vitality because it integrates known and unrecognized disturbances in multiple organ systems, many of which affect survival.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Only a few models assess overall predictive capacity using C statistics; the reported values are in the range found in the present study (published area under the curve range, 0.66–0.8261 vs this study, 0.717 and 0.737).”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Because gait speed can be assessed by nonprofessional staff using a 4-m walkway and a stopwatch,21 it is relatively simple to measure compared with many medical assessments.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Several authors have proposed that gait speeds faster than 1.0 m/s suggest healthier aging while gait speeds slower than 0.6 m/s increase the likelihood of poor health and function.7,21”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The participating study cohorts, while large and diverse, do not represent the universe of possible data.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The strengths of this study are the very large sample of individual participant data from multiple diverse populations of community-dwelling elders who were followed up for many years and use of consistent measures of performance and outcome.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed might help refine survival estimates in clinical practice or research because it is simple and informative.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the gait speed–survival relationship seems continuous across the entire range, cut points may help interpretation.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, participants in these studies had no prior knowledge about the meaning of walking speed.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Slowing gait may reflect both damaged systems and a high-energy cost of walking.13,39–54”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gait speed, age, and sex may offer the clinician tools for assessing expected survival to contribute to tailoring goals of care in older adults.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We were unable to assess the association of physical activity with survival in pooled analyses because measures of activity were highly variable across studies.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, median years of survival in this study resemble estimates for US adults across the sex and age range assessed.62”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Only 1 of the 9 studies was based in clinical practice,21 and advanced dementia is rare in populations who are competent to consent for research.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Prior analyses used single cohorts and presented results as relative rather than absolute risk, as done herein.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Some models use self-reported information but others also include physiological or performance data, for a total of 4 to more than 10 predictive factors.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This study has the limitations of observational research; it cannot establish causal relationships and is vulnerable to various forms of healthy volunteer bias.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The research studies analyzed herein used trained staff to measure gait speed. Staffin clinical settings would need initial training and may produce more variable results.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Others propose one cutoff around 0.8 m/s.13”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Long-distance walks have become accepted in some medical fields and may contribute information beyond short walks.66–68”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results found herein suggest that gait speed appears to be especially informative in older persons who report either no function all imitations or only difficulty with instrumental ADLs and may be less helpful for older adults who already report dependence in basic ADLs.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Similarly, mortality prediction models have been developed.3–5,57–60”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the longer distance and time to perform the test may limit feasibility in many clinical settings.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > COMMENT
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently no well-established approaches to predicting life expectancy that incorporate health and function.
“There are currently no well-established approaches to predicting life expectancy that incorporate health and function, although several models have been developed from individual data sources.3–5”
The paper relies on this without support.
Survival estimates help individualize goals of care for geriatric patients.
“Survival estimates help individualize goals of care for geriatric patients, but life tables fail to account for the great variability in survival.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advanced dementia is rare in populations who are competent to consent for research.
“Only 1 of the 9 studies was based in clinical practice,21 and advanced dementia is rare in populations who are competent to consent for research.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Edmonton Frail Scale is a multi-dimensional assessment instrument that includes the TUGT, and a test for cognitive impairment (108). It is quick to administer (less than 5 minutes) and is valid, reliable and feasible for routine use by non-geriatricians”
From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [108]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, gait speed was associated with survival in pooled analysis of individual data from 9 cohort studies (pooled HR per 0.1 m/s: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.87–0.90, P < 0.001) (78).”
From Health Consequences of Sarcopenic Obesity: A Narrative Review (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“including a significant association with survival at increments of 0.1 m/s.84”
In the citing paper
“accumulating evidence from both preclinical studies and recent human clinical trials strongly suggests that Mt have a key role in the pathogenesis of age-related functional decline, marked by slower walking speed.(Hiona and Leeuwenburgh 2008;Studenski, Perera, Patel, Rosano, Faulkner, Inzitari, Brach, Chandler, Cawthon, Connor, Nevitt, Visser, Kritchevsky, Badinelli, Harris, Newman, Cauley, Ferru”
From Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults (2015) · cites this paper as Studenski et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
“SPPB, 0.738”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
“95% CI, 0.690–0.735”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > Abstract > Results
“At age 75, predicted 10-year survival across the range of gait speeds ranged from 19% to 87% in men and from 35% to 91% in women.”
§ Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults > RESULTS
“In men, the probability of 5-year survival at age 85 ranged from 0.3 to 0.88 (eFigure 3A) and the probability of 10-year survival at age 75 years ranged from 0.18 to 0.86 (eFigure 4A). In women, the probability of 5-year survival remained greater than 0.5 until advanced age (eFigure 3B), but 10-year survival at age 75 years ranged from 0.34 to 0.92”
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552 · cited 6×
“6 77 (72-81) 57 (49-64) 31 (24-39) 88 (85-90) 75 (68-80) 61 (50-70) 53 (41-64) 23 (15-31) 6 (3-11) 67 (61-72) 42 (36-48) 18 (9-30)”
InfluentialQuantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763 · cited 6×
“6 77 (72-81) 57 (49-64) 31 (24-39) 88 (85-90) 75 (68-80) 61 (50-70) 53 (41-64) 23 (15-31) 6 (3-11) 67 (61-72) 42 (36-48) 18 (9-30)”
InfluentialThe Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M. A., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,875
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792 · cited 3×
“8 79 (74-83) 65 (57-71) 49 (35-61) 91 (89-93) 82 (78-86) 74 (69-78) 57 (52-62) 31 (24-38) 11 (3-28) 74 (71-77) 52 (46-57) 23 (18-28)”
Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model
Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 · Cited by 8,674
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380 · cited 5×
“6 77 (72-81) 57 (49-64) 31 (24-39) 88 (85-90) 75 (68-80) 61 (50-70) 53 (41-64) 23 (15-31) 6 (3-11) 67 (61-72) 42 (36-48) 18 (9-30)”
InfluentialStatistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data
Lawless, J. F. (2002) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118033005 · Cited by 4,521
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Survival Analysis Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data
Rao, M. B., Klein, J. P., & Moeschberger, M. L. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270658 · Cited by 3,617
The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Development and evaluation
Washburn, R. A., Smith, K. W., Jette, A. M., & Janney, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4 · Cited by 3,256 · cited 3×
“8 79 (74-83) 65 (57-71) 49 (35-61) 91 (89-93) 82 (78-86) 74 (69-78) 57 (52-62) 31 (24-38) 11 (3-28) 74 (71-77) 52 (46-57) 23 (18-28)”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 4,515
Biomarkers for physical frailty and sarcopenia: state of the science and future developments
Calvani, R., Marini, F., Cesari, M., Tosato, M., Anker, S. D., von Haehling, S., Miller, R. R., Bernabei, R., Landi, F., & Marzetti, E. (2015) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12051 · Cited by 275
Physiological Aging: Links Among Adipose Tissue Dysfunction, Diabetes, and Frailty
Stout, M. B., Justice, J. N., Nicklas, B. J., & Kirkland, J. L. (2017) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00012.2016 · Cited by 272
Medical research: Treat ageing
Fontana, L., Kennedy, B. K., Longo, V. D., Seals, D. R., & Melov, S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/511405a · Cited by 271
Lee, W., Liu, L.-K., Peng, L., Lin, M.-H., & Chen, L. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.019 · Cited by 276
Hanania, N. A., King, M. J., Braman, S. S., Saltoun, C. A., Wise, R. A., Enright, P., Falsey, A. R., Mathur, S. K., Ramsdell, J., Rogers, L., et al. (2011) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.06.048 · Cited by 267
White, D. K., Neogi, T., Nevitt, M. C., Peloquin, C. E., Zhu, Y., Boudreau, R. M., Cauley, J. A., Ferrucci, L., Harris, T. B., Satterfield, S., et al. (2012) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/gls197 · Cited by 270
Frailty and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Lee, H., Lee, E., & Jang, I. (2019) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e16 · Cited by 279
Beavers, K. M., Beavers, D. P., Houston, D. K., Harris, T. B., Hue, T. F., Koster, A., Newman, A. B., Simonsick, E. M., Studenski, S. A., Nicklas, B. J., et al. (2013) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.047860 · Cited by 259
Self-citationAmbulatory Fall-Risk Assessment: Amount and Quality of Daily-Life Gait Predict Falls in Older Adults
van Schooten, K. S., Pijnappels, M. A. G. M., Rispens, S. M., Elders, P. J. M., Lips, P. T. A. M., & van Dieën, J. H. (2015) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glu225 · Cited by 260
Explaining the unique nature of individual gait patterns with deep learning
Horst, F., Lapuschkin, S., Samek, W., Müller, K.-R., & Schöllhorn, W. I. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38748-8 · Cited by 295
Herssens, N., Verbecque, E., Hallemans, A., et al. (2018) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.012 · Cited by 256
A Diagnosis of Dismobility—Giving Mobility Clinical Visibility
Cummings, S. R., Studenski, S. A., & Ferrucci, L. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3033 · Cited by 250
Self-citationGreen, P., Arnold, S. V., Cohen, D. J., Kirtane, A. J., Kodali, S., Brown, D. L., Rihal, C. S., Xu, K., Lei, Y., Hawkey, M., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.061 · Cited by 247
Billot, M., Calvani, R., Urtamo, A., Sánchez-Sánchez, J. L., Ciccolari-Micaldi, C., Chang, M., Roller-Wirnsberger, R., Wirnsberger, G., Sinclair, A., Vaquero-Pinto, M. N., et al. (2020) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s253535 · Cited by 242
“Furthermore, age-related walking speed decline has been associated with increased risk of falls,(105) quality of life,(106) health status,(107) physical function, and mobility,(108,109) cognitive decline and dementia, and early mortality.(113) More specifically, Studenski et al(113) using individual data from 34,485 c…”
MethodProtein Requirements and Recommendations for Older People: A Review
Nowson, C., & O'Connell, S. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7085311 · Cited by 243
Tools in the Assessment of Sarcopenia
Cooper, C. C., Fielding, R. A., Visser, M., van Loon, L. J. C., Rolland, Y., ORWOLL, E. S., Reid, K. F., Boonen, S., Dere, W. H., Epstein, S., et al. (2013) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-013-9757-z · Cited by 267
Rooks, D., Praestgaard, J., Hariry, S., Laurent, D., Petricoul, O., Perry, R. G., Lach‐Trifilieff, E., & Roubenoff, R. (2017) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14927 · Cited by 244
“1 m/s and 25–50 m, respectively).(11,16) Bimagrumab was safe and well tolerated in older adults with low muscle mass and slower walking speed meeting the criteria for sarcopenia.”
BackgroundTorkamani, A., Andersen, K. G., Steinhubl, S. R., & Topol, E. J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.007 · Cited by 253
Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools
Apóstolo, J., Cooke, R. W. I., Campos, E. B., Santana, S., Marcucci, M., Cano, A., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., Germini, F., & Holland, C. (2017) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003018 · Cited by 255
“) and is also directly associated with cognitive decline such as global cognitive function, memory, and executive function(49,50) and mortality up to five years later.(51) In addition, neuroimaging studies have”
BackgroundPredicting Outcomes from 6-Minute Walk Distance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Spruit, M. A., Polkey, M. I., Celli, B. R., Edwards, L. D., Watkins, M. L., Pinto-Plata, V., Vestbo, J., Calverley, P. M. A., Tal‐Singer, R., Agustí, A. G. N., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.06.009 · Cited by 237
The Effects of Time Restricted Feeding on Overweight, Older Adults: A Pilot Study
Anton, S. D., Lee, S. A., Donahoo, W. T., McLaren, C., Manini, T. M., Leeuwenburgh, C., & Pahor, M. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071500 · Cited by 236
“and mortality in older adults [24–26], and that improvements in walking speed in older adults are associated with reduced risk of mortality [26].”
BackgroundPutative Cut‐Points in Sarcopenia Components and Incident Adverse Health Outcomes: An SDOC Analysis
Cawthon, P. M., Manini, T., Patel, S. M., Newman, A., Travison, T., Kiel, D. P., Santanasto, A. J., Ensrud, K. E., Xue, Q., Shardell, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16517 · Cited by 231
Measuring Aging and Identifying Aging Phenotypes in Cancer Survivors
Guida, J. L., Ahles, T. A., Belsky, D., Campisi, J., Cohen, H. J., DeGregori, J., Fuldner, R., Ferrucci, L., Gallicchio, L., Gavrilov, L., et al. (2019) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djz136 · Cited by 216
Self-citationAdafer, R., Messaadi, W., Meddahi, M., Patey, A., Haderbache, A., Bayen, S., & Messaadi, N. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12123770 · Cited by 243
Heterogeneity of Falls Among Older Adults: Implications for Public Health Prevention
Kelsey, J. L., Procter-Gray, E., Hannan, M. T., & Li, W. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300677 · Cited by 226
Roshanravan, B., Gamboa, J. L., & Wilund, K. R. (2017) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.01.051 · Cited by 238
Patel, N. K., Newstead, A. H., & Ferrer, R. L. (2012) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2011.0473 · Cited by 223
Molecular Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline
Eggener, S. E., Rumble, R. B., Armstrong, A. J., Morgan, T. M., Crispino, T., Cornford, P. A., van der Kwast, T., Grignon, D. J., Rai, A. J., Agarwal, N., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02768 · Cited by 230
Dance as an intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sharp, K., & Hewitt, J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.009 · Cited by 222
Forman, D. E., Fleg, J. L., Kitzman, D. W., Brawner, C. A., Swank, A. M., McKelvie, R. S., Clare, R. M., Ellis, S. J., Dunlap, M. E., & Bittner, V. (2012) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1010 · Cited by 224
Jung, H., Yoo, H., Park, S.-Y., Kim, S., Choi, J., Yoon, S.-J., Kim, C., & Kim, K. (2015) · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.3904/kjim.2014.331 · Cited by 223
Kittiskulnam, P., Chertow, G. M., Carrero, J. J., Delgado, C., Kaysen, G. A., & Johansen, K. L. (2017) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2017.01.024 · Cited by 218
Coelho‐Júnior, H. J., Trichopoulou, A., & Panza, F. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101395 · Cited by 227
Ramírez-Campillo, R., Castillo, A., de la Fuente, C. I., Campos-Jara, C., Andrade, D. C., Álvarez, C., Martínez, C., Castro-Sepúlveda, M., Pereira, A., Marques, M. C., et al. (2014) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.001 · Cited by 212
A meta-analysis: Parkinson's disease and dual-task walking
Raffegeau, T. E., Krehbiel, L. M., Kang, N., et al. (2018) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.12.012 · Cited by 215
Instrumenting gait with an accelerometer: A system and algorithm examination
Godfrey, A., Din, S. D., Barry, G., Mathers, J. C., & Rochester, L. (2015) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.003 · Cited by 215
The geriatric management of frailty as paradigm of “The end of the disease era”
Cesari, M., Marzetti, E., Thiem, U., Pérez‐Zepeda, M. U., van Kan, G. A., Landi, F., Petrović, M., Cherubini, A., & Bernabei, R. (2016) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.005 · Cited by 211
The Association Between Geriatric Syndromes and Survival
Kane, R. L., Shamliyan, T., Talley, K. M., & Pacala, J. T. (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03942.x · Cited by 219
Slower gait, slower information processing and smaller prefrontal area in older adults
Rosano, C., Studenski, S. A., Aizenstein, H. J., Boudreau, R. M., Longstreth, W. T., & Newman, A. B. (2011) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afr113 · Cited by 209
Self-citationOnline fronto-cortical control of simple and attention-demanding locomotion in humans
Holtzer, R., Mahoney, J. R., İzzetoğlu, M., Wang, C., England, S. M., & Verghese, J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.002 · Cited by 206
Twelve-year clinical trajectories of multimorbidity in a population of older adults
Vetrano, D. L., Roso‐Llorach, A., Fernández‐Bertolín, S., Guisado‐Clavero, M., Violán, C., Onder, G., Fratiglioni, L., Calderón‐Larrañaga, A., & Marengoni, A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16780-x · Cited by 207
Physical inactivity: associated diseases and disorders.
Knight, J. A. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 208
A life-course approach to healthy ageing: maintaining physical capability
Kuh, D. J., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., & Cooper, R. (2014) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665113003923 · Cited by 205
Intentional Weight Loss and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Kritchevsky, S. B., Beavers, K. M., Miller, M. E., Shea, M. K., Houston, D. K., Kitzman, D. W., & Nicklas, B. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121993 · Cited by 207
Hortobágyi, T., Lesinski, M., Gäbler, M., VanSwearingen, J. M., Malatesta, D., & Granacher, U. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0371-2 · Cited by 204
Veronese, N., Stubbs, B., Volpato, S., Zuliani, G., Maggi, S., Cesari, M., Lipnicki, D. M., Smith, L., Schofield, P., Firth, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.007 · Cited by 209
The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002–2012
Orkaby, A. R., Nussbaum, L. S., Ho, Y.-L. A., GAGNON, D. R., Quach, L., Ward, R. E., Quaden, R. M., Yaksic, E., Harrington, K. M., Paik, J. M., et al. (2018) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/gly232 · Cited by 203
“Like gait speed, a highly integrated measure of function that also powerfully predicts clinical outcomes (30), an FI expresses the overall state of an individual’s health.”
BackgroundSchimpl, M., Moore, C., Lederer, C., Neuhaus, A., Sambrook, J., Danesh, J., Ouwehand, W., & Daumer, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023299 · Cited by 190
Tooth Loss Associated with Physical and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults
Tsakos, G., Watt, R. G., Rouxel, P. L., de Oliveira, C. M., & Demakakos, P. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13190 · Cited by 206
Robinson, T. N., Wu, D. S., Sauaia, A., Dunn, C. L., Stevens-Lapsley, J. E., Moss, M., Stiegmann, G. V., Gajdos, C., Cleveland, J. C., & Inouye, S. K. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a4e96c · Cited by 199
Chen, D. S., Betz, J., Yaffe, K. S., Ayonayon, H. N., Kritchevsky, S. B., Martin, K. R., Harris, T. B., Purchase-Helzner, E., Satterfield, S., Xue, Q., et al. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glu207 · Cited by 200
Papanicolaou, D. A., Ather, S. N., Zhu, H., Zhou, Y., Lutkiewicz, J., Scott, B. B., & Chandler, J. (2013) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-013-0335-x · Cited by 196
Kallenberg, M. H., Kleinveld, H. A., Dekker, F. W., Munster, B. C. V., Rabelink, T. J., van Buren, M., & Mooijaart, S. P. (2016) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.13611215 · Cited by 204
“Objective measures of physical performance, such as gait speed, have firmly been established as predictors of poor outcome in older adults in general (11).”
BackgroundMotoric cognitive risk syndrome
Verghese, J., Ayers, E. I., Barzilai, N., Bennett, D. A., Buchman, A. S., Holtzer, R., Katz, M. J., Lipton, R. B., & Wang, C. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001084 · Cited by 200
Mobility in Older Community-Dwelling Persons: A Narrative Review
Freiberger, E., Sieber, C. C., & Kob, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00881 · Cited by 200
Pamoukdjian, F., Paillaud, É., Zelek, L. H., Laurent, M., Lévy, V., Landre, T., & Sebbane, G. (2015) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2015.08.006 · Cited by 215
Assessing Physical Function and Physical Activity in Patients with CKD
Painter, P., & Marcus, R. L. (2012) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.06590712 · Cited by 194
Mentiplay, B. F., Perraton, L. G., Bower, K. J., Pua, Y., McGaw, R., Heywood, S. E., & Clark, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.021 · Cited by 196
Warraich, H. J., Kitzman, D. W., Whellan, D. J., Duncan, P. W., Mentz, R. J., Pastva, A. M., Nelson, M. B., Upadhya, B., & Reeves, G. R. (2018) · Circulation: Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.118.005254 · Cited by 194
Gait speed, grip strength, and clinical outcomes in older patients with hematologic malignancies
Liu, M. A., DuMontier, C., Murillo, A., Hshieh, T. T., Bean, J. F., Soiffer, R. J., Stone, R. M., Abel, G. A., & Driver, J. A. (2019) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2019000758 · Cited by 194
Coletta, G., & Phillips, S. M. (2023) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2023.101883 · Cited by 217
“, 2016), gait speed is the preferred measure of muscle function due to its convenience and its alignment with relevant health-related outcomes in both clinical and research settings (Studenski et al., 2011).”
BackgroundUchitomi, R., Oyabu, M., & Kamei, Y. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12103189 · Cited by 200
“Furthermore, evidence from nine prospective cohort studies has shown that people with a high skeletal muscle mass and a fast walking speed have greater longevity as they are less likely to suffer from sarcopenia [6].”
BackgroundDaly, R. M., Rosengren, B. E., Alwis, G., Ahlborg, H. G., Sernbo, I., & Karlsson, M. K. (2013) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71 · Cited by 192
Wei, C., Cheng, R., Ning, C., et al. (2023) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202303562 · Cited by 191
Risk Factors for Hospital Admission Among Older Persons With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure
Chaudhry, S. I., McAvay, G., Chen, S., Whitson, H. E., Newman, A. B., Krumholz, H. M., & Gill, T. M. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.027 · Cited by 195
Clinical guidelines on frailty
Ткачева, О. Н., Kotovskaya, Y. V., Рунихина, Н. К., Frolova, E. V., Naumov, A. V., Vorobyeva, N. M., Сергеевна, О. В., Mkhitaryan, E. A., Шарашкина, Н. В., Tyukhmenev, E. A., et al. (2020) · Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46 · Cited by 210
Murad, K., Goff, D. C., Morgan, T. M., Burke, G. L., Bartz, T. M., Kizer, J. R., Chaudhry, S. I., Gottdiener, J. S., & Kitzman, D. W. (2015) · JACC Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2015.03.004 · Cited by 198
Stout, N. L., Silver, J. K., Raj, V. S., Rowland, J. H., Gerber, L. H., Cheville, A. L., Ness, K. K., Radomski, M. V., Nitkin, R. M., Stubblefield, M. D., et al. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.002 · Cited by 187
Schmid, A. A., Puymbroeck, M. V., Altenburger, P., Dierks, T. A., Miller, K. K., Damush, T. M., & Williams, L. S. (2012) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.020 · Cited by 187
Are Older Adults Less Embodied? A Review of Age Effects through the Lens of Embodied Cognition
Costello, M. C., & Bloesch, E. K. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00267 · Cited by 193
“These bodily changes are matched by decreases in motor function (cf., Seidler et al., 2010), with older adults exhibiting slower motor responsiveness (Falkenstein et al., 2006), more variable and slower physical movements (Mau-Moeller et al., 2013), and reduced gait speed (Studenski et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMeasuring gait speed to better identify prodromal dementia
Grande, G., Triolo, F., Nuara, A., Welmer, A., Fratiglioni, L., & Vetrano, D. L. (2019) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2019.05.014 · Cited by 195
Impact of Cognitive Training on Balance and Gait in Older Adults
Smith-Ray, R. L., Hughes, S. L., PROHASKA, T. R., Little, D. M., Jurivich, D. A., & Hedeker, D. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt097 · Cited by 183
Diagnosing sarcopenia: Functional perspectives and a new algorithm from the ISarcoPRM
Kara, M., Kaymak, B., Frontera, W. R., Ata, A. M., Ricci, V., Ekiz, T., Chang, K. C., Han, D., Michail, X., Quittan, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-2851 · Cited by 190
“6 m/s increases the likelihood of poor health and function (127).”
BackgroundGeerse, D. J., Coolen, B. H., & Roerdink, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139913 · Cited by 182
Reliability and validity of 4-metre gait speed in COPD
Kon, S. S. C., Patel, M. S., Canavan, J. L., Clark, A. L., Jones, S. E., Nolan, C. M., Cullinan, P., Polkey, M. I., & Man, W. D. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00162712 · Cited by 189
Bénétos, A., Bulpitt, C. J., Petrović, M., Ungar, A., Rosei, E. A., Cherubini, A., Redón, J., Grodzicki, T. K., Dominiczak, A. F., Strandberg, T. E., et al. (2016) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.07020 · Cited by 180
Kutner, N. G., Zhang, R. V., Huang, Y., & Painter, P. (2015) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.024 · Cited by 179
Comorbidity and Functional Trajectories From Midlife to Old Age: The Health and Retirement Study
Stenholm, S., Westerlund, H., Head, J. A., Hyde, M., Kawachi, I. I., Pentti, J., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Vahtera, J. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glu113 · Cited by 180
Montero‐Odasso, M., Almeida, Q. J., Bherer, L., Burhan, A. M., Camicioli, R. M., Doyon, J., Fraser, S., Hunter, S. W., Li, K., Liu-Ambrose, T. Y. L., et al. (2018) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/gly148 · Cited by 185
“Slow gait speed predicts future fall risk, hospitalization, institutionalization (23,24), cognitive decline (25), incident dementia (12,26–28), and mortality (29).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAssociation between sarcopenia and pneumonia in older people
Okazaki, T., Ebihara, S., Mori, T., Izumi, S., & Ebihara, T. (2019) · Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international · doi:10.1111/ggi.13839 · Cited by 184
Physical Activity and Sarcopenic Obesity: Definition, Assessment, Prevalence and Mechanism
Lee, D.-C., Shook, R. P., Drenowatz, C., & Blair, S. N. (2016) · Future Science OA · doi:10.4155/fsoa-2016-0028 · Cited by 177
Sorror, M. L., Storer, B. E., Fathi, A. T., Gerds, A. T., Medeiros, B. C., Shami, P. J., Brunner, A. M., Sekeres, M. A., Mukherjee, S., Peña, E., et al. (2017) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2714 · Cited by 178
“Alternatively,agingcouldbeasurrogate forother forms of health limitations, for example, functional, cognitive, or social.(4,5) Our current efforts are directed toward quantification and understanding of such aging-related risks (NCT01929408).”
BackgroundKumar, P., Liu, C., Hsu, J. W.-C., Chacko, S. K., Minard, C. G., Jahoor, F., & Sekhar, R. V. (2021) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.372 · Cited by 184
“Although a key meta-analysis in OA has shown that lower gait speed is linked to decreased survival, 68 restoring gait speed in OA to levels seen in YA has been difficult to achieve.”
Gait Speed and Operative Mortality in Older Adults Following Cardiac Surgery.
Afilalo, J., Kim, S., O’Brien, S., Brennan, J. M., Edwards, F. H., Mack, M. J., McClurken, J. B., Cleveland, J. C., Smith, P. K., Shahian, D. M., et al. (2016) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0316 · Cited by 175
Fukumori, N., Yamamoto, Y., Takegami, M., Yamazaki, S., Ônishi, Y., Sekiguchi, M., Otani, K., Konno, S., Kikuchi, S., & Fukuhara, S. (2015) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afv013 · Cited by 186
Xie, B., An, Z., Zheng, Y., & Li, Z. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.010 · Cited by 174
“In a cohort study sampling 34485 older adults, Kuritzky (2011) 195 observed significant differences in the gait speed, i.e., the mobility, of older adults.”
BackgroundAssociation of Neurocognitive and Physical Function With Gait Speed in Midlife
Rasmussen, L. J. H., Caspi, A., Ambler, A. P., Broadbent, J. M., Cohen, H. J., d’Arbeloff, T. C., Elliott, M. L., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13123 · Cited by 193
Vetrano, D. L., Rizzuto, D., Calderón‐Larrañaga, A., Onder, G., Welmer, A., Bernabei, R., Marengoni, A., & Fratiglioni, L. (2018) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002503 · Cited by 171
Roelker, S. A., Bowden, M. G., Kautz, S. A., & Neptune, R. R. (2018) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.027 · Cited by 174
Cardiovascular Disease and Frailty: What Are the Mechanistic Links?
Stewart, R. (2018) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2018.287318 · Cited by 171
Frailty and the Selection of Patients for Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device
Flint, K. M., Matlock, D. D., Lindenfeld, J. M., & Allen, L. A. (2012) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.111.963215 · Cited by 169
Reve, E. V. H., Silveira, P., Daniel, F., Casati, F., & de Bruin, E. D. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3055 · Cited by 170
Hamaker, M. E., Vos, A. G., Smorenburg, C. H., de Rooij, S. E., & Munster, B. C. V. (2012) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0186 · Cited by 167
Association Between Purpose in Life and Objective Measures of Physical Function in Older Adults
Kim, E. S., Kawachi, I. I., Chen, Y., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2145 · Cited by 178
Physical Functional Assessment in Older Adults
Patrizio, E., Calvani, R., Marzetti, E., & Cesari, M. (2021) · The Journal of Frailty & Aging · doi:10.14283/jfa.2020.61 · Cited by 169
“They also estimated the median life expectancy based on sex, age, and gait speed, providing a sort of nomograms (29).”
MethodWhite, D. K., Tudor-Locke, C. E., Zhang, Y., Fielding, R. A., LaValley, M. P., Felson, D. T., Gross, K. D., Nevitt, M. C., Lewis, C. E., Torner, J. C., et al. (2014) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22362 · Cited by 165
Physical capability in mid-life and survival over 13 years of follow-up: British birth cohort study
Cooper, R., Strand, B. H., Hardy, R., Patel, K. V., & Kuh, D. J. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2219 · Cited by 172
The integration of frailty into clinical practice: Preliminary results from the Gérontopôle
Subra, J., Guyonnet, S., Cesari, M., Oustric, S., & Vellas, B. J. (2012) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-012-0391-7 · Cited by 174
Stanaway, F., Gnjidic, D., Blyth, F., Couteur, D. G. L., Naganathan, V., Waite, L. M., Seibel, M. J., Handelsman, D. J., Sambrook, P. N., & Cumming, R. G. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d7679 · Cited by 165
Diabetic Neuropathy and Gait: A Review
Alam, U., Riley, D. R. J., Jugdey, R. S., Azmi, S., Rajbhandari, S. M., D’Août, K., & Malik, R. A. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0295-y · Cited by 179
“Gait speed is positively correlated to survival advantage in the aged population [46].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Studenski, S.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Studenski, Stephanie
- ORCID
- Studenski, Stephanie
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2011-01-05
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC3080184
- OpenAlex
- W2159296038
- Semantic Scholar
- 25de2f67035336224c9f1e37f58c5b531d34b9ed
- Cited by
- 4,558
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 377 · 2025: 333 · 2024: 267 · 2023: 311 · 2022: 355 · 2021: 399 · 2020: 389 · 2019: 358 · 2018: 272 · 2017: 301 · 2016: 255 · 2015: 273 · 2014: 243 · 2013: 184 · 2012: 166
- FWCI
- 100.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
- National Institute on Aging (AG023641, AG 024827, K07AG023641, P30AG024827, P30AG021332)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- walking speed, survival, older adults, life expectancy, physical performance, mortality prediction, goals of care, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Gait, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, United States, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Survival Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
