Cited by 1,644Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease<subtitle>The Nun Study</subtitle>

Snowdon, David A.·1997·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

Objective. —To determine the relationship of brain infarction to the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease (AD). Design. —Cognitive function and the prevalence of dementia were determined for participants in the Nun Study who later died. At autopsy, lacunar and larger brain infarcts were identified, and senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the neocortex were quantitated. Participants with abundant senile plaques and some neurofibrillary tangles in the neocortex were classified as having met the neuropathologic criteria for AD. Setting. —Convents in the Midwestern, Eastern, and Southern United States. Participants. —A total of 102 college-educated women aged 76 to 100 years. Main Outcome Measures. —Cognitive function assessed by standard tests and dementia and AD assessed by clinical and neuropathologic criteria. Results. —Among 61 participants who met the neuropathologic criteria for AD, those with brain infarcts had poorer cognitive function and a higher prevalence of dementia than those without infarcts. Participants with lacunar infarcts in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or deep white matter had an especially high prevalence of dementia, compared with those without infarcts (the odds ratio [OR] for dementia was 20.7,95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.5-288.0). Fewer neuropathologic lesions of AD appeared to result in dementia in those with lacunar infarcts in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or deep white matter than in those without infarcts. In contrast, among 41 participants who did not meet the neuropathologic criteria for AD, brain infarcts were only weakly associated with poor cognitive function and dementia. Among all 102 participants, atherosclerosis of the circle of Willis was strongly associated with lacunar and large brain infarcts. Conclusion. —These findings suggest that cerebrovascular disease may play an important role in determining the presence and severity of the clinical symptoms of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1997.03540340047031

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snowdon, D. A.
Corresponding author
Snowdon, David A.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1997-03-12
Volume
277
Issue
10
Pages
813
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4296588155
Cited by
1,590
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 74
FWCI
34.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG009862, P50AG005144, KO4AG00553)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, lacunar infarction, dementia, cognitive function, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerosis, circle of Willis, thalamic infarction, basal ganglia infarcts, older women, neuropathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review