CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR/Cas Systems in Genome Editing: Methodologies and Tools for sgRNA Design, Off‐Target Evaluation, and Strategies to Mitigate Off‐Target Effects

Manghwar, Hakim, Li, Bo, Ding, Xiao, Hussain, Amjad, Lindsey, Keith, Zhang, Xianlong, Jin, Shuangxia·2020·Advanced Science
DOI 10.1002/advs.201902312PMC PMC7080517
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Life sciences have been revolutionized by genome editing (GE) tools, including zinc finger nucleases, transcription activator‐Like effector nucleases, and CRISPR (clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas (CRISPR‐associated) systems, which make the targeted modification of genomic DNA of all organisms possible. CRISPR/Cas systems are being widely used because of their accuracy, efficiency, and cost‐effectiveness. Various classes of CRISPR/Cas systems have been developed, but their extensive use may be hindered by off‐target effects. Efforts are being made to reduce the off‐target effects of CRISPR/Cas9 by generating various CRISPR/Cas systems with high fidelity and accuracy. Several approaches have been applied to detect and evaluate the off‐target effects. Here, the current GE tools, the off‐target effects generated by GE technology, types of off‐target effects, mechanisms of off‐target effects, major concerns, and outcomes of off‐target effects in plants and animals are summarized. The methods to detect off‐target effects, tools for single‐guide RNA (sgRNA) design, evaluation and prediction of off‐target effects, and strategies to increase the on‐target efficiency and mitigate the off‐target impact on intended genome‐editing outcomes are summarized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.201902312

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.004 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nbt.3659 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/s13059-018-1534-x · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nbt.2507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nbt.2650 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1104/pp.15.00636 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.029 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.04.009 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/s13578-019-0298-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt.4102 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkt714 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00002-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41587-019-0050-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ncomms15790 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/s41467-018-04580-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01245 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/s13059-018-1458-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1402597111 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/ncomms13350 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ncomms12778 · DOI
  23. 10.1242/dev.099085 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41594-019-0188-z · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/s41592-018-0011-5 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41421-019-0088-8 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nmeth.2845 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty558 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/nph.13470 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/523158a · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nmeth.4293 · DOI
  35. 10.1042/ETLS20170037 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41477-019-0406-z · DOI
  37. 10.1093/nsr/nwz005 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.gene.2019.03.019 · DOI
  39. 10.3390/ijms161024751 · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.1700557114 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41422-019-0159-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1400822111 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/pbi.12200 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41598-017-00578-x · DOI
  45. 10.1111/pbi.13020 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/ncomms12463 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nmeth.3284 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nmeth.2408 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/nm.4313 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s41467-018-07988-z · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkq791 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/febs.13248 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/s41467-017-01732-9 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41594-018-0051-7 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/pbi.13025 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gkv575 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/nar/gku410 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/srep25516 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/nar/gky354 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.004 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.molp.2017.01.003 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nmeth.2812 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkw407 · DOI
  67. Aach J., 2014, BioRxiv, 005074
  68. 10.1186/s13059-018-1445-x · DOI
  69. 10.1186/s12920-018-0394-2 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/nrg.2016.28 · DOI
  71. 10.1101/gr.219089.116 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1038/nchembio.1793 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/nbt.3155 · DOI
  75. 10.1002/anie.201606123 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.009 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/s41467-018-05477-x · DOI · Paper page
  78. Li D., 2019, Cell Biol. Toxicol., 1
  79. 10.1073/pnas.1714640114 · DOI
  80. 10.1126/sciadv.aax5717 · DOI
  81. 10.1038/s41587-019-0236-6 · DOI
  82. 10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1016/j.molp.2019.03.011 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/emm.2016.111 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/srep26685 · DOI
  86. 10.1042/BCJ20170793 · DOI
  87. 10.1126/science.aaq0180 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.029 · DOI
  89. 10.1038/nbt.3596 · DOI
  90. 10.1038/nbt.3609 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005595 · DOI
  92. 10.1073/pnas.1810062115 · DOI
  93. 10.1101/gr.162339.113 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1038/nbt.2916 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.4161/15384101.2014.949201 · DOI
  96. 10.1038/srep12327 · DOI
  97. 10.1093/nar/gkw398 · DOI
  98. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00020 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Manghwar, H., Li, B., Ding, X., Hussain, A., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S.
Affiliations
  • National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan Hubei 430070 P. R. China
  • Department of Biosciences Durham University Durham DH1 3LE UK
ORCID
Jin, Shuangxia
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
ISSN
2198-3844
DOI
10.1002/advs.201902312
PMC
PMC7080517
Cited by
347
References
41
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • National R&D Project of Transgenic Crops of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018ZX08010-05B, 2016ZX08005-001-006, 2019ZX08010-003)
  • National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFD0100203-9)
  • Consulting Project of China Academy of Engineering (2018-XY-63)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review