The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 33 of the 47 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Inhibition of Acyl‐CoenzymeA: Cholesterol Acyltransferase 1 promotes shedding of soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) and low‐density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LRP1)‐dependent phagocytosis of amyloid beta protein in microglia
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Lipid regulation is crucial role in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. In AD, microglia show elevated sterol O‐acyltransferase 1/Acyl‐coenzymeA: Choleseterol Acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) expression, encoding Acyl‐coenzymeA: Cholesterol Acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1), which produces cholesteryl esters (CEs) in lipid droplets. Inhibiting ACAT1 has been shown to reduce amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology, though the mechanism is unclear. METHODS: We inhibited ACAT1 using avasimibe (AV) in wild‐type, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) knockout (KO), and low‐density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1 (LRP1) KO mouse BV2 and human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived microglia and measured the impact on Aβ uptake to determine the mechanism through which the inhibition of ACAT1 enhances Aβ uptake. RESULTS: ACAT1 inhibition increased LRP1 levels and soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) release via enhanced TREM2 cleavage by ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10/17 (ADAM10/17). KO of TREM2 or blockade of sTREM2 release prevented AV‐enhanced Aβ uptake. This effect was rescued by recombinant sTREM2, but only when LRP1 was present. DISCUSSION: ACAT1 inhibition promotes microglial Aβ uptake in a sTREM2‐ and LRP1‐dependent manner, offering insights into novel therapeutic strategies for AD. Highlights: Inhibition of ACAT1, the major enzyme that catalyzes cholesterol storage via esterification enhances microglia‐mediated Aβ uptake. Increased Aβ uptake is dependent on the presence of both TREM2 and LRP1. Inhibition of ACAT1 increases cleavage of TREM2 via ADAM10/17 to release sTREM2. Treatment of microglial cells with sTREM2 rescues Aβ uptake in TREM2 KO BV2 cells. Inhibition of ACAT1 promotes Aβ uptake through increased shedding of TREM2, which enhances Aβ uptake through a LRP1‐dependent mechanism.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Inhibiting ACAT1 with avasimibe increases Aβ42 uptake in mouse BV2 and human iPSC-derived microglia. The effect requires ADAM10/17-mediated TREM2 cleavage to release sTREM2 and LRP1-dependent internalization of the sTREM2–Aβ complex.
Key findings
- Avasimibe reduced cholesteryl esters and increased Aβ42 uptake: in BV2 cells, 10 and 15 µM avasimibe increased uptake by 195.8% and 237.9%; in human iMGLs, 10 µM avasimibe decreased cholesteryl esters by 43.1% and increased Aβ42 uptake by 95.5%.
- TREM2 was required: TREM2 KO reduced Aβ42 uptake by 40.5% and abrogated avasimibe-enhanced uptake; avasimibe decreased full-length TREM2 protein by 47.2% and increased extracellular sTREM2 by 17.3%. ADAM10/17 inhibition blocked avasimibe-enhanced uptake, while 40 nM recombinant sTREM2 increased uptake by 75.6% and rescued ADAM10/17 inhibition (107.9%).
- LRP1 was required: avasimibe increased LRP1 protein by 102.7%; LRP1 KO reduced Aβ42 uptake by 64.16% and prevented avasimibe- or avasimibe-conditioned-medium-enhanced uptake; the LRP1 antagonist RAP also abrogated avasimibe-enhanced uptake. Recombinant sTREM2 did not increase Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO cells.
Methods
- In vitro study using wild-type, TREM2 KO, and LRP1 KO mouse BV2 microglial cells and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia; TREM2 KO iMGL clones B6 and E3 were generated by CRISPR/Cas9.
- Cells were treated with avasimibe, the ADAM10/17 inhibitor GW280264X, Aβ42, recombinant sTREM2, and/or RAP; conditioned-medium experiments transferred medium from avasimibe- or control-treated BV2 cells to new cells.
- Main assays were fluorometric cholesterol/cholesteryl ester measurement, Aβ42 and sTREM2 ELISA, and immunoblotting; data are from at least three independent experiments, analyzed by one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test or unpaired t-test and expressed as mean ± SEM.
Limitations
- The paper does not state limitations.
- Evident from the text: all experiments are in cultured BV2 and hiPSC-derived microglia, with no in vivo AD model or human brain tissue validation reported.
- Evident from the text: LRP1 requirement was tested in BV2 KO cells rather than human iMGLs, and TREM2 KO iMGLs were generated in a control hiPSC line (NDS00159) while the parental iMGL line is ND41865, so possible genetic background differences are not addressed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
33 of 47 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
ACAT1 inhibition reduces Aβ pathology in AD models.
“Inhibiting ACAT1 has been shown to reduce amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology, though the mechanism is unclear.”
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · boosted
“Previous in vivo work from our lab showed that ACAT1 inhibition reduced Aβ production and deposition in AD mouse models. 12 Other studies showed that ACAT1 inhibition reduced AD pathology by promoting microglia‐mediated clearance of Aβ. 13 , 14 , 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Hutter‐Paier B, Huttunen HJ, Puglielli L, et al. The ACAT inhibitor CP‐113,818 markedly reduces amyloid pathology in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2010; 68: 1014. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.028 15473963 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [13] Shibuya Y, Chang CCY, Huang LH, Bryleva EY, Chang TY. Inhibiting ACAT1/SOAT1 in microglia stimulates autophagy‐mediated lysosomal proteolysis and increases Aβ1‐42 clearance. J Neurosci. 2014; 34: 14484– 14501. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567‐14.2014 25339759 PMC4205563 source
- cites [14] van der Kant R, Langness VF, Herrera CM, et al. Cholesterol metabolism is a druggable axis that independently regulates tau and amyloid‐β in iPSC‐derived Alzheimer's disease neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2019; 24: 363– 375. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.013 30686764 PMC6414424 source
The Introduction reports that cholesterol esters enhance Aβ production and cites ACAT-inhibitor studies; the References list a mouse study in which an ACAT inhibitor reduced amyloid pathology. However, the paper does not leave the mechanism wholly unclear: its Results identify an APP cholesterol-binding domain that mediates the effect of lowering cholesterol esters on Aβ secretion in iPSC-derived neurons. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · boosted
- Premisecitation
TREM2-enriched microglia are found surrounding amyloid plaques.
“with TREM2‐enriched microglia found surrounding amyloid plaques. 16 , 17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Zhao Y, Wu X, Li X, et al. TREM2 is a receptor for β‐amyloid that mediates microglial function. Neuron. 2018; 97: 1023– 1031. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.031 29518356 PMC5889092 source
The Results section reports that microglia clustered at Aβ-enriched regions after Aβ injection in mice, and that clustering was reduced by TREM2 deletion. This supports TREM2-dependent clustering near Aβ, but the paper does not establish that the clustered microglia are TREM2-enriched or show them surrounding amyloid plaques specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Wang Y, Cella M, Mallinson K, et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer's disease model. Cell. 2015; 160: 1061– 1071. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049 25728668 PMC4477963 source
The Results section on microglial colocalization reports clusters of microglia around amyloid plaques in 5XFAD mice, with fewer clusters when TREM2 is deficient. The section on reactive microgliosis reports increased Trem2 expression in microglia isolated during amyloid deposition, but does not establish that the microglia surrounding plaques are specifically TREM2-enriched. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
ACAT1 inhibitors reduce Aβ-induced neurotoxicity.
“ACAT1 inhibitors reduce Aβ‐induced neurotoxicity (reviewed in Shibuya et al. 10 and Chang et al. 11 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Shibuya Y, Chang CCY, Chang T. ACAT1/SOAT1 as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Future Med Chem. 2015; 7: 2451– 2467. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvnwc0d0.18 26669800 PMC4976859 source
- cites [11] Chang TY, Chang CCY, Harned TC, et al. Blocking cholesterol storage to treat Alzheimer's disease. Explor Neuroprotective Ther. 2021; 1: 173– 184. doi: 10.37349/ent.2021.00014 35199105 PMC8863366 source
The ‘ACAT1 blockade and AD’ section reports that ACAT1 blockade increases clearance of Aβ oligomers in preclinical models. The ‘Cholesterol loading, CE content, and the A1B hypothesis’ section proposes that blockade helps repair membranes damaged by oligomeric Aβ. These passages support a protective rationale, but they do not report a direct reduction in Aβ-induced neurotoxicity by ACAT1 inhibitors. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
TREM2 regulates cholesterol transport and metabolism through transcriptional regulation and endocytosis of cholesterol-rich substances such as myelin and cell debris.
“Furthermore, TREM2 regulates cholesterol transport and metabolism through transcriptional regulation and endocytosis of cholesterol‐rich substances such as myelin and cell debris. 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron. 2020; 105: 837– 854. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007 31902528 source
The Summary and Introduction identify TREM2 as a transcriptional regulator of microglial cholesterol transport and metabolism during chronic myelin phagocytosis. But the Summary says TREM2-deficient microglia still phagocytose myelin debris and fail to clear its cholesterol; the paper does not establish endocytosis of myelin or other cell debris as the mechanism of cholesterol regulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Multiple AD mouse models show 3- to 11-fold higher CE levels in the brain compared to controls.
“Additionally, multiple AD mouse models have shown 3‐ to 11‐fold higher CE levels in the brain compared to controls. 7 , 8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Chan RB, Oliveira TG, Cortes EP, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 2678– 2688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274142 22134919 PMC3268426 source
The Results (page unavailable) report approximately 4.3-fold higher total CE in PS1-APP mouse forebrain, with an approximately 11-fold increase in a specific CE species, CE-22:6. They describe only a trend toward higher total CE in APP mice and do not establish a 3- to 11-fold increase in total CE across multiple mouse models. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Tajima Y, Ishikawa M, Maekawa K, et al. Lipidomic analysis of brain tissues and plasma in a mouse model expressing mutated human amyloid precursor protein/tau for Alzheimer's disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2013; 12: 1– 14. doi: 10.1186/1476‐511X‐12‐68 23659495 PMC3668217 source
- Premisecitation
LRP1 is a widely expressed receptor that enhances Aβ uptake, clearance, and degradation.
“LRP1 is a widely expressed receptor that was previously shown to enhance Aβ uptake, clearance, and degradation. 21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Liu CC, Hu J, Zhao N, Wang J, Wang N, Cirrito JR, et al. Astrocytic LRP1 mediates brain Aβ clearance and impacts amyloid deposition. J Neurosci. 2017; 37: 4023– 4031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3442‐16.2017 28275161 PMC5391682 source
- Premisecitation
Brain samples from late-onset AD (LOAD) patients exhibit a 1.8-fold increase in CE levels versus controls in vulnerable brain regions.
“Brain samples from late‐onset AD (LOAD) patients exhibit a 1.8‐fold increase in CE levels versus controls in vulnerable brain regions. 7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Chan RB, Oliveira TG, Cortes EP, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 2678– 2688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274142 22134919 PMC3268426 source
The Results report significantly higher cholesterol ester (CE) levels in the entorhinal cortex of LOAD patients, a vulnerable region, but give the increase as approximately 1.7-fold, not 1.8-fold. The 1.8-fold increase reported elsewhere in the Results refers to a different lipid, so the claimed magnitude for CE is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Aβ42 uptake significantly increased by 195.8% and 237.9% following treatment with 10 and 15 μM AV, respectively, in WT BV2 microglial cells.
“Aβ42 uptake significantly increased by 195.8% and 237.9% following treatment with 10 and 15 µM AV, respectively (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
When comparing WT versus TREM2 KO iMGLs both treated with AV, there was a 130.5% increase in Aβ42 uptake in WT iMGLs versus TREM2 KO iMGLs.
“When comparing WT versus TREM2 KO iMGLs, both treated with AV, we observed a 130.5% increase in Aβ42 uptake in WT iMGLs versus TREM2 KO iMGLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Findingown data
Treatment of WT BV2 cells with AV decreased full-length TREM2 protein levels by 47.2%.
“treatment of WT BV2 cells with AV decreased full‐length TREM2 protein levels (47.2%) (Figure 3A,B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
No significant change in Aβ42 uptake was observed in TREM2 KO iMGLs treated with AV compared to control treated TREM2 KO iMGLs.
“However, no significant change in Aβ42 uptake was observed in TREM2 KO iMGLs treated with AV compared to control treated TREM2 KO iMGLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Findingown data
AV CM from WT BV2 cells did not increase Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells.
“We also found that AV CM from WT BV2 cells did not increase Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AV-mediated enhancement of Aβ42 uptake was abrogated in the presence of RAP as compared to control-treated cells.
“Figure 4F shows AV‐mediated enhancement of Aβ42 uptake was abrogated in the presence of RAP as compared to control‐treated cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TREM2 knockout significantly reduced Aβ42 uptake in iMGLs by 40.5% compared to WT iMGLs.
“Figure 2A shows that KO of TREM2 significantly reduced Aβ42 uptake in iMGLs (by 40.5%) compared to WT iMGLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Findingown data
In WT BV2 cells treated with AV overnight, replacing medium with CNT-CM left Aβ42 uptake unchanged.
“In WT BV2 cells treated with AV overnight, in which the medium was then removed and replaced with CNT‐CM, Aβ42 uptake was unchanged (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Absence of TREM2 in iMGLs significantly impaired augmented Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition.
“Furthermore, we showed that the absence of TREM2 in iMGLs significantly impaired augmented Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition increases LRP1 protein levels.
“ACAT1 inhibition increased LRP1 levels and soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) release via enhanced TREM2 cleavage by ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10/17 (ADAM10/17).”
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · boosted
“We also show that ACAT1 inhibition increases protein levels of LRP1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · boosted
- Findingown data
LRP1 was essential for enhanced Aβ uptake mediated by sTREM2 following ACAT1 inhibition.
“Here, we showed that LRP1 was essential for enhanced Aβ uptake mediated by sTREM2 following ACAT1 inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inhibition of ADAM10/17 with GW280264X alone does not significantly change Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated cells in WT BV2 microglia.
“Figure 3G shows that the inhibition of ADAM10/17 with GW280264X alone does not significantly change Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition was unable to increase Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 microglial cells compared to control cells.
“ACAT1 inhibition was unable to increase Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 microglial cells compared to control cells (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recombinant sTREM2 rescues Aβ uptake in TREM2 KO BV2 cells.
“Treatment of microglial cells with sTREM2 rescues Aβ uptake in TREM2 KO BV2 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Rests on an assumption: Recombinant sTREM2 added to culture medium functions equivalently to endogenously shed sTREM2.
- Findingown data
Treatment with recombinant 40 nM sTREM2 led to no change in Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO cells treated with both GW280264X and AV, in contrast to WT BV2 cells.
“Finally, treatment with recombinant 40 nM sTREM2 led to no change in Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO cells treated with both GW280264X and AV, in contrast to the results from WT BV2 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition increased Aβ uptake in both human iMGL and mouse BV2 microglial cells.
“Here, we demonstrated that ACAT1 inhibition increased Aβ uptake in both human iMGL and mouse BV2 microglial cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LRP1 is required for microglial sTREM2-mediated Aβ uptake.
“We show that LRP1 is required for microglial sTREM2‐mediated Aβ uptake”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Recombinant sTREM2 added to culture medium functions equivalently to endogenously shed sTREM2.
- Findingown data
WT iMGLs treated with AV exhibited a 122.6% increase in Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated TREM2 KO iMGLs.
“and a 122.6% increase compared to control treated TREM2 KO iMGLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Findingown data
Addition of sTREM2 increased Aβ42 uptake in a concentration-dependent manner, with 40 nM, but not 20 nM sTREM2 significantly increasing Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated cells.
“The addition of sTREM2 increased Aβ42 uptake in a concentration‐dependent manner, with 40 nM, but not 20 nM sTREM2 significantly increasing Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated cells (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition enhanced ADAM10/17-mediated cleavage of TREM2, leading to increased shedding of sTREM2 into the media of AV treated microglial cells.
“Here, we observed that ACAT1 inhibition enhanced ADAM10/17‐mediated cleavage of TREM2, leading to increased shedding of sTREM2 into the media of AV treated microglial cells (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LRP1 KO BV2 cells treated with ADAM10/17 inhibitor GW280264X alone or combined with AV treatment revealed no change in Aβ42 uptake.
“Next, as observed in the WT BV2 cells, LRP1 KO BV2 cells treated with ADAM10/17 inhibitor, GW280264X, alone or combined with AV treatment, revealed no change in Aβ42 uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition increases sTREM2 release via enhanced TREM2 cleavage by ADAM10/17.
“ACAT1 inhibition increased LRP1 levels and soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) release via enhanced TREM2 cleavage by ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10/17 (ADAM10/17).”
- Also stated in: § Highlights · plain
“Inhibition of ACAT1 increases cleavage of TREM2 via ADAM10/17 to release sTREM2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The ADAM10/17 inhibitor GW280264X specifically blocks TREM2 shedding without other effects.
- Also stated in: § Highlights · plain
- Findingown data
In human iMGLs, 10 μM AV treatment for 24 h increased Aβ uptake by 95.5%.
“and increased Aβ uptake by 95.5% (Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
sTREM2 levels were significantly increased by 17.3% in cell culture medium following AV treatment compared to control-treated cells.
“sTREM2 levels were significantly increased (17.3%) compared to control‐treated cells (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
AV-CM significantly increased Aβ42 uptake in CNT treated cells (82.9%) and AV treated cells (83.1%) compared to WT BV2 cells not treated with AV-CM (CNT CNT-CM).
“Analysis of Aβ42 uptake revealed AV‐CM significantly increased Aβ42 uptake in CNT treated cells (82.9%) and AV treated cells (83.1%) compared to WT BV2 cells, which were not treated with AV‐CM (CNT CNT‐CM) (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Blockade of sTREM2 release prevents AV-enhanced Aβ uptake.
“KO of TREM2 or blockade of sTREM2 release prevented AV‐enhanced Aβ uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The ADAM10/17 inhibitor GW280264X specifically blocks TREM2 shedding without other effects.
- Findingown data
ACAT1 inhibition increased LRP1 protein levels.
“Additionally, ACAT1 inhibition increased LRP1 protein levels (Figure 4B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LRP1 KO BV2 cells continued to exhibit no change in Aβ42 uptake when treated with 10 μM AV for 24 h.
“LRP1 KO BV2 cells continued to exhibit no change in Aβ42 uptake when treated with 10 µM AV for 24 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recombinant sTREM2 rescue of Aβ uptake requires LRP1.
“This effect was rescued by recombinant sTREM2, but only when LRP1 was present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Recombinant sTREM2 added to culture medium functions equivalently to endogenously shed sTREM2.
- Findingown data
WT iMGLs treated with AV exhibited a 95.5% increase in Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated WT iMGLs.
“WT iMGLs treated with AV exhibited a 95.5% increase in Aβ42 uptake compared to control treated WT iMGLs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
Decreased full-length TREM2 protein levels were observed in AV treated microglial cells undergoing impaired cholesterol storage.
“We provide further support for the role of TREM2 in enhanced microglial Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition by showing decreased full‐length TREM2 protein levels in AV treated microglial cells undergoing impaired cholesterol storage (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
WT BV2 cells treated with 10 μM AV for 24 h exhibited significantly increased protein levels of LRP1 (102.7%) compared to DMSO CNT treated cells.
“First, we observed that WT BV2 cells treated with 10 µM AV for 24 h exhibited significantly increased protein levels of LRP1 (102.7%) compared to DMSO CNT treated cells (Figure 4A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A 24-h treatment with avasimibe (AV) decreases cholesteryl ester (CE) levels in WT BV2 microglial cells in a dose-dependent manner, with 2.5 μM and 5 μM AV decreasing CE by roughly 20% and 10 μM and 15 μM leading to an approximately 30% decrease compared to control.
“A 24‐h treatment with AV decreased CE levels at nearly all concentrations (Figure 1A) in a dose‐dependent manner, with 2.5 µM and 5 µM AV decreasing CE by roughly 20% and 10 µM and 15 µM leading to an ∼30% decrease in CE levels compared to control treated cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
TREM2 protein levels in LRP1 KO BV2 cells were significantly lower than in WT BV2 cells.
“we measured TREM2 protein levels in LRP1 KO BV2 cells and observed significantly lower levels of total TREM2 compared to WT BV2 cells (Figure S2A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No change in Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells following treatment with 40 nM recombinant sTREM2.
“Additionally, we observed no change in Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells following treatment with 40 nM recombinant sTREM2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In WT BV2 cells treated with 250 nM RAP 30 min prior to addition of Aβ42, Aβ42 uptake was significantly decreased.
“In WT BV2 cells treated with 250 nM RAP 30 min prior to the addition of Aβ42, we observed a significant decrease in Aβ42 uptake (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When control WT BV2 cells were treated with WT AV CM together with RAP, AV-enhanced Aβ42 uptake was abrogated compared to control WT BV2 cells.
“Additionally, when control WT BV2 cells were treated with WT AV CM together with RAP, AV‐enhanced Aβ42 uptake was abrogated compared to control WT BV2 cells (Figure 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
WT AV-CM significantly increased (43.9%) Aβ42 uptake in TREM2 KO BV2 cells compared to TREM2 KO cells treated with WT CNT-CM.
“WT AV‐CM significantly increased (43.9%) Aβ42 uptake in TREM2 KO BV2 cells compared to TREM2 KO cells treated with WT CNT‐CM (Figure 3F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells was significantly decreased (64.16%) compared to WT BV2.
“In Figure 4C, we show that Aβ42 uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells was significantly decreased (64.16%) compared to WT BV2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In human iMGLs, 10 μM AV treatment for 24 h decreased CE levels by 43.1%.
“In iMGLs, 10 µM AV treatment for 24 h decreased CE levels by 43.1% (Figure 1C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Findingown data
TREM2 knockout abrogates the ability of AV to augment microglial Aβ42 uptake in iMGLs.
“TREM2 KO abrogated the ability of AV to augment microglial Aβ42 uptake as compared to WT cells (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Study design and conductown data
TREM2 KO clones B6 and E3 contained a +1 insertion at the Cas9 cleavage site, creating frameshift mutations that disrupted the TREM2 coding sequence.
“Both selected clones contained a +1 insertion at the Cas9 cleavage site, creating frameshift mutations that disrupted the TREM2 coding sequence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ACAT1 inhibition promotes microglial Aβ uptake in a sTREM2- and LRP1-dependent manner.
“ACAT1 inhibition promotes microglial Aβ uptake in a sTREM2‐ and LRP1‐dependent manner, offering insights into novel therapeutic strategies for AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: Recombinant sTREM2 added to culture medium functions equivalently to endogenously shed sTREM2.
- Interpretationreasoning
Decreasing TREM2 protein levels is a suitable physiological response to protect cells with impaired cholesterol storage from further internalizing cholesterol-rich substances.
“While initially surprising, decreasing TREM2 protein levels is a suitable physiological response to protect cells with impaired cholesterol storage from further internalizing cholesterol‐rich substances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Following ACAT1 inhibition, LRP1 most likely serves as a major receptor for microglial uptake of Aβ42, via internalization of a sTREM2-Aβ complex.
“Taken together, these data suggest that following ACAT1 inhibition, LRP1 most likely serves as a major receptor for microglial uptake of Aβ42, via internalization of a sTREM2‐Aβ complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
At the concentration and treatment time used, processing of proteins involved in Aβ uptake (e.g., RP1) is not impacted in WT BV2 microglia by GW280264X.
“suggesting that, at this concentration and treatment time, processing of proteins involved in Aβ uptake, for example, RP1, are not impacted in WT BV2 microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When lipid-loaded microglia are treated with ACAT1 inhibitors, their ability to phagocytose Aβ improves.
“Furthermore, when lipid‐loaded microglia are treated with ACAT1 inhibitors, their ability to phagocytose Aβ improves. 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron. 2020; 105: 837– 854. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007 31902528 source
- Interpretationreasoning
LRP1 is a receptor for the internalization of the sTREM2-Aβ complex.
“strongly suggesting LRP1 is a receptor for the internalization of the sTREM2–Aβ complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ACAT1 inhibition promotes cleavage of membrane TREM2 and shedding of sTREM2 into the culture medium.
“Thus, ACAT1 inhibition promotes cleavage of membrane TREM2 and shedding of sTREM2 into the culture medium”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Interpretationown data
CM from AV treated cells is sufficient for augmenting Aβ42 uptake in microglia.
“These findings indicate that CM from AV treated cells is sufficient for augmenting Aβ42 uptake in microglia.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“In support of this hypothesis, we showed that medium conditioned by WT BV2 microglial cells treated with an ACAT1 inhibitor was sufficient to increase Aβ uptake in WT BV2 cells, which had not been treated with an ACAT1 inhibitor (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationown data
Components in the medium following AV treatment are necessary for inducing increased uptake of Aβ42 in microglia.
“These data indicate that components in the medium following AV treatment are necessary for inducing increased uptake of Aβ42 in microglia.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Importantly, when we replaced the medium of ACAT1 inhibitor treated WT BV2 microglial cells with CM from control treated WT BV2 cells, Aβ uptake was no longer increased (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationown data
LRP1 is required/necessary for ACAT1 inhibition-enhanced microglial Aβ42 uptake.
“Taken together, these data indicate that LRP1 is required for AV‐mediated enhancement of microglial Aβ42 uptake.”
- Also stated in: § LRP1 is required for enhanced sTREM2‐mediated Aβ42 uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglia · hedged
“Collectively, these data suggest that LRP1 is a crucial receptor for augmented microglial uptake of Aβ42 following ACAT1 inhibition.”
- Also stated in: § LRP1 is required for enhanced sTREM2‐mediated Aβ42 uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglia · boosted
“Collectively, these findings show that LRP1 is necessary for AV‐induced enhancement of Aβ uptake in microglia and that the observed effects of decreased Aβ uptake in LRP1 KO BV2 cells are not due to decreased TREM2 levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § LRP1 is required for enhanced sTREM2‐mediated Aβ42 uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglia · hedged
- Premisecitation
Microglia isolated from vulnerable brain regions in various neurodegenerative diseases, including LOAD, contain elevated ACAT1 (SOAT1) mRNA.
“In AD, microglia show elevated sterol O‐acyltransferase 1/Acyl‐coenzymeA: Choleseterol Acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) expression, encoding Acyl‐coenzymeA: Cholesterol Acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1), which produces cholesteryl esters (CEs) in lipid droplets.”
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · plain
“Finally, microglia isolated from vulnerable brain regions in various neurogenerative diseases, including LOAD, contain elevated levels of ACAT1 (sterol O‐acyltransferase 1 [SOAT1)]) mRNA. 9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Li H, Huynh TN, Duong MT, Gow JG, Chang CCY, Chang TY. ACAT1/SOAT1 blockade suppresses LPS‐mediated neuroinflammation by modulating the fate of toll‐like receptor 4 in microglia. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(6): 5616. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065616 36982689 PMC10053317 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Also stated in: § BACKGROUND · plain
- Interpretationown data
The data presented are the first to reveal LRP1 as the receptor for the sTREM2-Aβ complex.
“To our knowledge, the data presented are the first to reveal LRP1 as the receptor for the sTREM2‐Aβ complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Augmented uptake of Aβ42 by human iMGLs treated with ACAT1 inhibitors is dependent on the presence of TREM2.
“Collectively, these data demonstrate that augmented uptake of Aβ42 by human iMGLs treated with ACAT1 inhibitors is dependent on the presence of TREM2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
- Interpretationown data
Release of sTREM2 via ADAM10/17-mediated cleavage of membrane TREM2 is the major driver of increased Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglia.
“Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the release of sTREM2 via ADAM10/17‐mediated cleavage of membrane TREM2 is the major driver of increased Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglia.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“Collectively, these data establish that the shedding of TREM2 is the major driver of enhanced microglial uptake of Aβ following inhibition of ACAT1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning
Depletion of intracellular CE levels following ACAT1 inhibition with AV is responsible for the elevation in soluble factors that are released by microglia and enhance Aβ42 uptake.
“Furthermore, these data suggest that depletion of intracellular CE levels following ACAT1 inhibition with AV is responsible for the elevation in soluble factors that are released by microglia and enhance Aβ42 uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Inhibition of CE formation alters intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in increased ADAM10/17 activity.
“These findings suggest that inhibition of CE formation alters intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in increased ADAM10/17 activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationLRP1 has been implicated in AD pathology.
“has also been implicated in AD pathology. 21 , 32 , 33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [21] Liu CC, Hu J, Zhao N, Wang J, Wang N, Cirrito JR, et al. Astrocytic LRP1 mediates brain Aβ clearance and impacts amyloid deposition. J Neurosci. 2017; 37: 4023– 4031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3442‐16.2017 28275161 PMC5391682 source
- cites [32] Shinohara M, Tachibana M, Kanekiyo T, Bu G. Role of LRP1 in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: evidence from clinical and preclinical studies. J Lipid Res. 2017; 58: 1267– 1281. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R075796 28381441 PMC5496044 source
- cites [33] Na H, Yang JB, Zhang Z, et al. Peripheral apolipoprotein E proteins and their binding to LRP1 antagonize Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis in the brain during peripheral chronic inflammation. Neurobiol Aging. 2023; 127: 54– 69. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.02.013 37060729 PMC10198819 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLRP1 plays roles in lipid metabolism, protein clearance, and cell signaling.
“LRP1, a well‐known receptor playing roles in lipid metabolism, 28 protein clearance, 29 and cell signaling, 30 , 31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] Terrand J, Bruban V, Zhou L, et al. LRP1 controls intracellular cholesterol storage and fatty acid synthesis through modulation of wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 381– 388. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806538200 18990694 PMC2610522 source
- cites [29] Kounnas MZ, Moir RD, et al. LDL receptor‐related protein, a multifunctional ApoE receptor, binds secreted β‐amyloid precursor protein and mediates its degradation. Cell. 1995; 82: 331– 340. doi: 10.1016/0092‐8674(95)90320‐8 7543026 source
- cites [30] Yang L, Liu CC, Zheng H, et al. LRP1 modulates the microglial immune response via regulation of JNK and NF‐ΚB signaling pathways. J Neuroinflammation. 2016; 13: 1– 13. doi: 10.1186/s12974‐016‐0772‐7 27931217 PMC5146875 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTREM2 promotes phagocytosis of cholesterol-rich substances.
“Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) promotes phagocytosis of cholesterol‐rich substances 15”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron. 2020; 105: 837– 854. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007 31902528 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationHiPSCs were differentiated to hiPSC-derived microglial cells (iMGL) according to the protocol previously published by McQuade et al., with minor adjustments.
“HiPSCs were differentiated to hiPSC‐derived microglial cells (iMGL) according to the protocol previously published by McQuade et al., with minor adjustments.22,23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Abud EM, Ramirez RN, Martinez ES, et al. iPSC‐derived human microglia‐like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron. 2017; 94: 278– 293. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042 28426964 PMC5482419 source
The Results section (“Human microglia-like cells are generated from iPSCs”; page unavailable) describes a two-step protocol for generating iMGLs from iPSCs, and STAR Methods details the differentiation. Our copy identifies it as the authors’ protocol, not one previously published by McQuade et al.; it cannot verify the citing authors’ minor adjustments. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] McQuade A, Coburn M, Tu CH, Hasselmann J, Davtyan H, Blurton‐Jones M. Development and validation of a simplified method to generate human microglia from pluripotent stem cells. Mol Neurodegener. 2018; 13: 1– 13. doi: 10.1186/s13024‐018‐0297‐x 30577865 PMC6303871 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLRP1 binds many ligands and functions in a context-dependent manner.
“LRP1 binds many ligands and is known to function in a context‐dependent manner. 40 , 41”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [40] Lillis AP, Van Duyn LB, Murphy‐Ullrich JE, Strickland DK. LDL receptor‐related protein 1: unique tissue‐specific functions revealed by selective gene knockout studies. Physiol Rev. 2008; 88: 887– 918. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2007 18626063 PMC2744109 source
- cites [41] Yamamoto K, Scilabra SD, Bonelli S, et al. Novel insights into the multifaceted and tissue‐specific roles of the endocytic receptor LRP1. J Biol Chem. 2024; 300: 107521. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107521 38950861 PMC11325810 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationsTREM2 binds Aβ, preventing its aggregation and increasing clearance.
“Multiple studies have reported that sTREM2 binds Aβ, preventing its aggregation and increasing clearance. 18 , 19 , 20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Zhong L, Xu Y, Zhuo R, et al. Soluble TREM2 ameliorates pathological phenotypes by modulating microglial functions in an Alzheimer's disease model. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 1– 16. doi: 10.1038/s41467‐019‐09118‐9 30911003 PMC6433910 source
The Discussion reports that oligomeric Aβ42 binds sTREM2, and the Results section on microglial phagocytosis and clearance reports enhanced Aβ uptake and clearance with sTREM2. The paper does not establish that this binding prevents Aβ aggregation; it attributes reduced plaque deposition to microglial activity rather than demonstrating an anti-aggregation effect. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] La Rosa F, Agostini S, Piancone F, et al. TREM2 expression and amyloid‐beta phagocytosis in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(10): 8626. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108626 37239970 PMC10218378 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [20] Vilalta A, Zhou Y, Sevalle J, et al. Wild‐type sTREM2 blocks Aβ aggregation and neurotoxicity, but the Alzheimer's R47H mutant increases Aβ aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2021; 296: 1– 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100631 PMC8113883 33823153 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRAP is a well-known LRP1 antagonist that binds LRP1 and reduces its ligand binding capacity.
“we tested the effects of receptor associated protein (RAP), a well‐known LRP1 antagonist that binds LRP1 and reduces its ligand binding capacity. 29 , 34”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Kounnas MZ, Moir RD, et al. LDL receptor‐related protein, a multifunctional ApoE receptor, binds secreted β‐amyloid precursor protein and mediates its degradation. Cell. 1995; 82: 331– 340. doi: 10.1016/0092‐8674(95)90320‐8 7543026 source
- cites [34] Ulery PG, Beers J, Mikhailenko I, et al. Modulation of β‐amyloid precursor protein processing by the low density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein (LRP). J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 7410– 7415. Evidence that LRP contributes to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7410 10702315 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationsTREM2 has been shown to prevent Aβ aggregation and promote phagocytosis.
“sTREM2 has been shown to prevent Aβ aggregation and promote phagocytosis. 20 , 38 , 39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Vilalta A, Zhou Y, Sevalle J, et al. Wild‐type sTREM2 blocks Aβ aggregation and neurotoxicity, but the Alzheimer's R47H mutant increases Aβ aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2021; 296: 1– 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100631 PMC8113883 33823153 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that wild-type sTREM2 inhibits Aβ fibril and larger-oligomer formation, supporting the aggregation part of the claim. Our copy does not report that sTREM2 promotes phagocytosis; the only exact mention of phagocytosis is in a cited reference about microglial phagocytosis of neurons. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [38] Brown GC, St George‐Hyslop P. Does soluble TREM2 protect against Alzheimer's disease? Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 13: 1– 7. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.834697 PMC8831327 35153729 source
- cites [39] Filipello F, Goldsbury C, You SF, Locca A, Karch CM, Piccio L. Soluble TREM2: innocent bystander or active player in neurological diseases? Neurobiol Dis. 2022; 165: 105630. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105630 35041990 PMC10108835 source
The ‘Potential functions of sTREM2’ section (page unavailable) states that sTREM2 binding inhibits Aβ aggregation. It reports microglial activation and reduced plaque load after sTREM2 treatment, but does not say that sTREM2 promotes phagocytosis; the paper attributes phagocytosis to the membrane TREM2 receptor in its Introduction. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningWe and others have proposed that TREM2 plays a major role in sensing and employing cellular changes necessary to adapt to impaired cholesterol storage, thereby supporting a connection between TREM2 activity and ACAT1 inhibition.
“For these reasons, we and others have proposed that TREM2 plays a major role in sensing and employing cellular changes necessary to adapt to impaired cholesterol storage, thereby supporting a connection between TREM2 activity and ACAT1 inhibition. 15 , 36”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge. Neuron. 2020; 105: 837– 854. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007 31902528 source
The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) identify TREM2 as important for microglial adaptation to a chronic cholesterol challenge, and report that ACAT1 inhibition rescues cholesteryl ester accumulation in TREM2-deficient cells. They describe the underlying impairment as cholesterol efflux, however, not impaired cholesterol storage; storage-form cholesterol instead accumulates. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [36] Wei W, Zhang L, Xin W, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial lipid droplet formation and represses post‐ischemic brain injury. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024; 170: 1– 19. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115962 38042110 source
The Introduction describes TREM2 as a lipid sensor, and the Discussion reports that TREM2 knockdown impairs microglial cholesterol clearance and alters cholesteryl-ester storage. These passages support a role for TREM2 in responding to altered lipid metabolism, but the paper does not establish the claimed connection between TREM2 activity and ACAT1 inhibition. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationACAT1 inhibition reduces multiple aspects of AD pathology in vivo and in vitro.
“ACAT1 inhibition reduces multiple aspects of AD pathology in vivo 12 and in vitro. 13”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Hutter‐Paier B, Huttunen HJ, Puglielli L, et al. The ACAT inhibitor CP‐113,818 markedly reduces amyloid pathology in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2010; 68: 1014. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.028 15473963 source
Citation 12 is attached to the in vivo portion of the sentence, not the in vitro portion. The indexed copy is an erratum (p. 1014) whose title identifies reduced amyloid pathology in a mouse model, and its correction discusses plaque counts without changing the original conclusions. It does not provide results establishing reductions in multiple aspects of AD pathology. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] Shibuya Y, Chang CCY, Huang LH, Bryleva EY, Chang TY. Inhibiting ACAT1/SOAT1 in microglia stimulates autophagy‐mediated lysosomal proteolysis and increases Aβ1‐42 clearance. J Neurosci. 2014; 34: 14484– 14501. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2567‐14.2014 25339759 PMC4205563 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAmyloid beta protein (Aβ) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD).
“The amyloid beta protein (Aβ) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Tanzi RE, Bertram L. Twenty years of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective. Cell. 2005; 120: 545– 555. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008 15734686 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCholesterol storage is predominantly driven by ACAT1, which catalyzes the esterification of cholesterol to produce cholesteryl esters (CEs).
“Cholesterol storage is predominantly driven by the resident endoplasmic reticulum protein Acyl‐coenzymeA: Cholesterol Acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1), 4 which catalyzes the esterification of cholesterol to produce cholesteryl esters (CEs). 5 , 6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Chang TY, Li BL, Chang CCY, Urano Y. Acyl‐coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferases. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 297: 1– 9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90926.2008 PMC2711667 19141679 source
- cites [5] Qian H, Zhao X, Yan R, et al. Structural basis for catalysis and substrate specificity of human ACAT1. Nature. 2020; 581: 333– 338. doi: 10.1038/s41586‐020‐2290‐0 32433614 source
The Introduction identifies ACAT1 as an ER membrane protein and says ACAT enzymes produce cholesteryl esters, the preferred form for cellular cholesterol storage. The paper also describes ACAT2, but does not establish that storage is predominantly driven by ACAT1 rather than other enzymes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Chang CCY, Chen J, Thomas MA, et al. Regulation and immunolocalization of acyl‐coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase in mammalian cells as studied with specific antibodies. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270: 29532– 29540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29532 7493995
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationLRP1 regulates intracellular signaling events involved in lipid metabolism, cholesterol storage, and fatty acid synthesis.
“Since LRP1 regulates intracellular signaling events involved in lipid metabolism, cholesterol storage, and fatty acid synthesis, 28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Terrand J, Bruban V, Zhou L, et al. LRP1 controls intracellular cholesterol storage and fatty acid synthesis through modulation of wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 381– 388. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806538200 18990694 PMC2610522 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAβ accumulates as oligomers and plaques, triggering neurodegeneration and cognitive decline.
“Aβ accumulates as oligomers and plaques, triggering neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016; 8: 595– 608. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606210 27025652 PMC4888851 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data40 nM sTREM2 rescued the effect of ADAM10/17 inhibition in AV treated WT BV2 cells, significantly increasing Aβ42 uptake by 107.9% compared to control treated cells.
“Importantly, 40 nM sTREM2 also rescued the effect of ADAM10/17 inhibition in AV treated WT BV2 cells, significantly increasing Aβ42 uptake by 107.9% compared to control treated cells (Figure 3G).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · hedged
“Moreover, the effect of ADAM10/17 inhibition on ACAT1 inhibitor‐mediated Aβ uptake could be rescued by the simple addition of recombinant sTREM2 during Aβ incubation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · hedged
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWhen LRP1 KO BV2 cells were treated with AV, sTREM2 levels were increased by 16.3% compared to DMSO (CNT), similar to the 17.3% increase observed in WT BV2 cells.
“However, when LRP1 KO BV2 cells were treated with AV, sTREM2 levels were increased by 16.3% compared to DMSO (CNT) (Figure S2C). This increase was similar to that observed in WT BV2 cells (17.3% in Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWhen GW280264X treatment was combined with AV treatment, Aβ42 uptake was no longer increased compared to control treated cells; AV treatment alone increased uptake by 57.1%.
“When GW280264X treatment was combined with AV treatment, Aβ42 uptake was no longer increased compared to control treated cells; AV treatment alone increased uptake by 57.1% (Figure 3G).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“we showed that ADAM10/17 inhibition abrogated ACAT1 inhibitor‐mediated enhancement of Aβ uptake (Figure 3G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAddition of 40 nM sTREM2 to WT BV2 cells significantly increased Aβ42 uptake by 75.6% compared to control treated cells; this is comparable to the 57.2% increase observed with AV treatment.
“Additionally, Figure 3G shows that the addition of 40 nM sTREM2 to WT BV2 cells significantly increased Aβ42 uptake by 75.6% compared to control treated cells; this is comparable to the 57.2% increase in Aβ42 uptake that was observed with AV treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataAV treatment prevents the formation of CE by ACAT1 in both mouse BV2 and human iMGL cells, leading to increased Aβ uptake in a dose-dependent manner.
“Taken together, these data show AV treatment prevents the formation of CE by ACAT1 in both mouse BV2 and human iMGL cells, leading to increase Aβ uptake in a dose‐dependent manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrevious studies showed that cholesterol depletion enhanced the activity of ADAM10/17, leading to increased shedding of substrates such as the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6).
“Previous studies showed that cholesterol depletion enhanced the activity of ADAM10/17, leading to increased shedding of substrates such as the interleukin‐6 receptor (IL‐6). 37”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Matthews V, Schuster B, Schütze S, et al. Cellular cholesterol depletion triggers shedding of the human interleukin‐6 receptor by ADAM10 and ADAM17 (TACE). J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 38829– 38839. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210584200 12832423 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationsTREM2 has been shown to bind Aβ and prevent its oligomerization and fibrillation, as well as increase Aβ phagocytosis.
“sTREM2 has been shown to bind Aβ and prevent its oligomerization and fibrillation, as well as increase Aβ phagocytosis. 27”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Belsare KD, Wu H, Mondal D, et al. Soluble TREM2 inhibits secondary nucleation of Aβ fibrillization and enhances cellular uptake of fibrillar Aβ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(5): e2114486119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114486119 35082148 PMC8812518 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAlois Alzheimer originally reported the accumulation of lipid droplets in the glial cells of AD patients.
“Additionally, Alois Alzheimer originally reported the accumulation of lipid droplets in the glial cells of AD patients (translated in Stelzmann et al. 3 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Stelzmann RA, Norman Schnitzlein H, Reed Murtagh F. An English translation of Alzheimer's 1907 paper, “über eine eigenartige erkankung der hirnrinde”. Clin Anat. 1995; 8: 429– 431. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080612 8713166 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataInhibition of ACAT1 in microglial cells results in increased uptake of Aβ in a LRP1-dependent manner via a mechanism in which TREM2 shedding is enhanced by increased ADAM10/17 cleavage.
“In summary, we show that the inhibition of ACAT1 in microglial cells results in increased uptake of Aβ in a LRP1‐dependent manner via a mechanism in which TREM2 shedding is enhanced by increased ADAM10/17 cleavage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
- Rests on an assumption: The LRP1 requirement for microglial sTREM2-mediated Aβ uptake observed in vitro reflects the mechanism in vivo.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenAll cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.
“All cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTREM2 plays an essential role in maintaining microglial metabolic fitness during stress events and is necessary for microglial cells to fully transition into the disease-associated microglia (DAM) phenotype, which is sustained in the presence of Aβ-induced pathology.
“TREM2 plays an essential role in maintaining microglial metabolic fitness during stress events 35 and is necessary for microglial cells to fully transition into the disease‐associated microglia (DAM) phenotype, which is sustained in the presence of Aβ‐induced pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Zhou Y, Ulland TK, Colonna M. TREM2‐dependent effects on microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018; 10: 1– 7. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00202 30038567 PMC6046445 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataACAT1 inhibitor-enhanced microglial uptake of Aβ occurs via altered cholesterol metabolism due to ACAT1 inhibition leading to elevated shedding of sTREM2 via increased ADAM10/ADAM17-mediated cleavage of membrane TREM2, and simultaneous increase in LRP1 levels which phagocytoses Aβ bound to sTREM2.
“Overall, our combined findings support a mechanism for ACAT1 inhibitor‐enhanced microglial uptake of Aβ, wherein altered cholesterol metabolism due to ACAT1 inhibition leads to elevated shedding of sTREM2, via increased ADAM10/ADAM17‐mediated cleavage of membrane TREM2. ACAT1 inhibition simultaneously increases levels of LRP1, which serves to phagocytose Aβ bound to sTREM2 (Figure 5).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“This body of evidence robustly supports a novel and heretofore unknown mechanism for the manner in which ACAT1 inhibition leads to increased microglial phagocytosis of Aβ (Figure 5) as follows: (1) AV treatment inhibits ACAT1, thereby decreasing CE levels, (2) depletion of cholesterol enhances ADAM10/17 cleavage of membrane TREM2 to promote TREM2 shedding, and (3) elevated levels of sTREM2 in the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataLRP1 is a necessary and sufficient receptor for sTREM2-dependent augmentation of Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglial cells.
“Collectively, these data strongly support LRP1 as a necessary and sufficient receptor for sTREM2‐dependent augmentation of Aβ uptake following ACAT1 inhibition in microglial cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of ACAT1 inhibition on AD pathology have remained unclear.
“While these studies showed a clear value of ACAT1 inhibition in reducing AD pathology, the mechanisms underlying these beneficial effects have remained unclear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataADAM10/17 activity alone does not significantly contribute to baseline Aβ42 uptake but is necessary for the enhancement of microglial Aβ42 uptake following inhibition of ACAT1.
“These results indicate that ADAM10/17 activity alone does not significantly contribute to baseline Aβ42 uptake but is necessary for the enhancement of microglial Aβ42 uptake following inhibition of ACAT1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Avasimibe's effects on Aβ uptake and TREM2 shedding are mediated specifically through ACAT1 inhibition, not through off-target effects.
“treated with stated concentrations and times of ACAT1 inhibitor avasimibe (AV) (HY‐13215)”
“Inhibition of ACAT1 prevents the formation of CEs, providing a measurable parameter to assess the efficacy of the ACAT1 inhibitor, AV, in microglial cells. 13 , 24”
The paper relies on this without support.
The TREM2 KO iMGL and BV2 cells lack functional TREM2 protein.
“Both selected clones contained a +1 insertion at the Cas9 cleavage site, creating frameshift mutations that disrupted the TREM2 coding sequence.”
“TREM2 KO abrogated the ability of AV to augment microglial Aβ42 uptake as compared to WT cells (Figure 2B).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recombinant sTREM2 added to culture medium functions equivalently to endogenously shed sTREM2.
“When stated, 40 nM sTREM2 recombinant protein (TR2‐M52H3) was added directly to the medium of treated cells immediately before Aβ42.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ADAM10/17 inhibitor GW280264X specifically blocks TREM2 shedding without other effects.
“WT BV2 cells treated with DMSO (CNT), 10 µM AV, or 3 µM ADAM10/17 inhibitor (GW280264X) (Ai) for 24 h followed by a 3‐h incubation with 300 nM Aβ42 and 40 nM sTREM2 as stated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LRP1 requirement for microglial sTREM2-mediated Aβ uptake observed in vitro reflects the mechanism in vivo.
“This novel mechanism of Aβ clearance provides a unique opportunity to utilize ACAT1 inhibitors or other therapeutic methods to induce the generation of sTREM2 and promote microglial Aβ uptake via LRP1.”
Citations
Cites
The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years
Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210 · Cited by 6,164
A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease
Keren-Shaul, H., Spinrad, A., Weiner, A., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Dvir-Szternfeld, R., Ulland, T. K., David, E., Baruch, K., Lara-Astaiso, D., Toth, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 · Cited by 5,493
SMARCAD1 ATPase activity is required to silence endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells
Sachs, P., Ding, D., Bergmaier, P., Lamp, B., Schlagheck, C., Finkernagel, F., Nist, A., Stiewe, T., & Mermoud, J. E. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09078-0 · Cited by 2,400
Twenty years of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective
Tanzi, R. E., & Bertram, L. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008 · Cited by 1,849
Self-citationTREM2 Lipid Sensing Sustains the Microglial Response in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model
Wang, Y., Cella, M., Mallinson, K., Ulrich, J. D., Young, K. L., Robinette, M. L., Gilfillan, S., Krishnan, G. M., Sudhakar, S., Zinselmeyer, B. H., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049 · Cited by 1,736
Protein Sensors for Membrane Sterols
Goldstein, J. L., DeBose-Boyd, R. A., & Brown, M. S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022 · Cited by 1,517
An english translation of alzheimer’s 1907 paper, “über eine eigenartige erkankung der hirnrinde”
Stelzmann, R. A., Norman Schnitzlein, H., & Reed Murtagh, F. (1995) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.980080612 · Cited by 1,455
TREM2 Maintains Microglial Metabolic Fitness in Alzheimer’s Disease
Ulland, T. K., Song, W. M., Huang, S. C.-C., Ulrich, J. D., Sergushichev, A., Beatty, W. L., Loboda, A. A., Zhou, Y., Cairns, N. J., Kambal, A., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.023 · Cited by 1,263
iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases
Abud, E. M., Ramirez, R. N., Martinez, E. S., Healy, L. M., Nguyen, C. H. H., Newman, S. A., Yeromin, A. V., Scarfone, V. M., Marsh, S. E., Fimbres, C., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042 · Cited by 1,154
TREM2 Is a Receptor for β-Amyloid that Mediates Microglial Function
Zhao, Y., Wu, X., Li, X., Jiang, L.-L., Gui, X., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, B., Piña-Crespo, J. C., Zhang, M., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.031 · Cited by 763
TREM2 regulates microglial cholesterol metabolism upon chronic phagocytic challenge
Nugent, A. A., Lin, K., van Lengerich, B., Lianoglou, S., Przybyla, L., Davis, S. S., Llapashtica, C., Wang, J., Kim, D. J., Xia, D., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.007 · Cited by 745
Lillis, A. P., Van Duyn, L. B., Murphy-Ullrich, J. E., & Strickland, D. K. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2007 · Cited by 669
Biosynthesis of Cholesterol and Other Sterols
Nes, W. D. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200021m · Cited by 657
Comparative Lipidomic Analysis of Mouse and Human Brain with Alzheimer Disease
Chan, R. B., Oliveira, T. G., Cortes, E. P., Honig, L. S., Duff, K. E., Small, S. A., Wenk, M. R., Shui, G., & Di Paolo, G. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.274142 · Cited by 630
Disease Progression-Dependent Effects of TREM2 Deficiency in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
Jay, T. R., Hirsch, A. M., Broihier, M. L., Miller, C. M., Neilson, L. E., Ransohoff, R. M., Lamb, B. T., & Landreth, G. E. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2110-16.2016 · Cited by 457
McQuade, A., Coburn, M., Tu, C. H., Hasselmann, J., Davtyan, H., & Blurton-Jones, M. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0297-x · Cited by 449
Quantifying the local adaptive landscape of a nascent bacterial community
Ascensao, J. A., Wetmore, K. M., Good, B. H., Arkin, A. P., & Hallatschek, O. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35677-5 · Cited by 447
Acyl‐coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferases
Chang, T.-Y., Li, B.-L., Chang, C. C. Y., & Urano, Y. (2009) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90926.2008 · Cited by 443
Sosna, J., Philipp, S., Albay, R., Reyes-Ruiz, J. M., Baglietto-Vargas, D., LaFerla, F. M., & Glabe, C. G. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0244-x · Cited by 406
Kounnas, M. Z., Moir, R. D., Rebeck, G. W., Bush, A. I., Argraves, W. S., Tanzi, R. E., Hyman, B. T., & Strickland, D. K. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90320-8 · Cited by 401
Self-citationColonna, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-023-00837-1 · Cited by 394
Matthews, V., Schuster, B., Schütze, S., Bussmeyer, I., Ludwig, A., Hundhausen, C., Sadowski, T., Saftig, P., Hartmann, D., Kallen, K.-J., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m210584200 · Cited by 390
Zhong, L., Xu, Y., Zhuo, R., Wang, T., Wang, K., Huang, R., Wang, D., Gao, Y., Zhu, Y., Sheng, X., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09118-9 · Cited by 371
van der Kant, R., Langness, V. F., Herrera, C. M., Williams, D. A., Fong, L. K., Leestemaker, Y., Steenvoorden, E., Rynearson, K. D., Brouwers, J. F., Helms, J. B., et al. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.013 · Cited by 350
Shinohara, M., Tachibana, M., Kanekiyo, T., & Bu, G. (2017) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r075796 · Cited by 297
TRPM2 Functions as a Lysosomal Ca2+-Release Channel in β Cells
Lange, I., Yamamoto, S., Partida‐Sánchez, S., Mori, Y., Fleig, A., & Penner, R. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000278 · Cited by 296
Ulery, P. G., Beers, J., Mikhailenko, I., Tanzi, R. E., Rebeck, G. W., Hyman, B. T., & Strickland, D. K. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.10.7410 · Cited by 271
Self-citationAstrocytic LRP1 Mediates Brain Aβ Clearance and Impacts Amyloid Deposition
Liu, C.-C., Hu, J., Zhao, N., Wang, J., Wang, N., Cirrito, J. R., Kanekiyo, T., Holtzman, D. M., & Bu, G. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3442-16.2017 · Cited by 267
Impact of TREM2R47H variant on tau pathology–induced gliosis and neurodegeneration
Gratuze, M., Leyns, C. E. G., Sauerbeck, A. D., St-Pierre, M.-K., Xiong, M., Kim, N., Serrano, J. R., Tremblay, M.-È., Kummer, T. T., Colonna, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci138179 · Cited by 252
Tomofuji, T., Ekuni, D., Azuma, T., Irie, K., Endo, Y., Kasuyama, K., Yoneda, T., & Morita, M. (2013) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/1476-511x-12-1 · Cited by 161
Catherine C. Y., C., Chen, J., Thomas, M. A., Cheng, D., Veronica A., D. P., Newton, R. S., Pape, M. E., & Chang, T.-Y. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.49.29532 · Cited by 158
Alzheimer’s Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Particular Association
Tini, G., Scagliola, R., Monacelli, F., Malfa, G. L., Porto, I., Brunelli, C., & Rosa, G. M. (2020) · Cardiology Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2020/2617970 · Cited by 157
Terrand, J., Bruban, V., Zhou, L., Gong, W., El Asmar, Z., May, P., Zurhove, K., Haffner, P., Philippe, C., Woldt, E., et al. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m806538200 · Cited by 143
Tajima, Y., Ishikawa, M., Maekawa, K., Murayama, M., Senoo, Y., Nishimaki-Mogami, T., Nakanishi, H., Ikeda, K., Arita, M., Taguchi, R., et al. (2013) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/1476-511x-12-68 · Cited by 139
Soluble TREM2: Innocent bystander or active player in neurological diseases?
Filipello, F., Goldsbury, C., You, S. F., Locca, A., Karch, C. M., & Piccio, L. (2022) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105630 · Cited by 134
Zhong, L., Chen, X.-F., Zhang, Z.-L., Wang, Z., Shi, X.-Z., Xu, K., Zhang, Y.-W., Xu, H., & Bu, G. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.645986 · Cited by 133
Ligand binding to LRP1 transactivates Trk receptors by a Src family kinase-dependent pathway.
Shi, Y., Mantuano, E., Inoue, G., Campana, W. M., & Gonias, S. L. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000188 · Cited by 130
LRP1 modulates the microglial immune response via regulation of JNK and NF‐ΚB signaling pathways
Yang, L., Liu, C.-C., Zheng, H., Kanekiyo, T., Atagi, Y., Jia, L., Wang, D., N’songo, A., Can, D., Xu, H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0772-7 · Cited by 129
TREM2 regulates microglial lipid droplet formation and represses post-ischemic brain injury
Wei, W., Zhang, L., Xin, W., Pan, Y., Tatenhorst, L., Hao, Z., Gerner, S. T., Huber, S., Juenemann, M., Butz, M., et al. (2024) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115962 · Cited by 122
ACAT1/SOAT1 as a Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer's Disease
Shibuya, Y., Chang, C. C., & Chang, T.-Y. (2015) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.15.161 · Cited by 113
Tong, Z., Han, C., Qiang, M., Wang, W., Lv, J., Zhang, S., Luo, W., Li, H., Luo, H., Zhou, J., et al. (2014) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.018 · Cited by 112
Use of Peptides for the Management of Alzheimer’s Disease: Diagnosis and Inhibition
Baig, M. H., Ahmad, K., Rabbani, G., & Choi, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00021 · Cited by 110
Shibuya, Y., Chang, C. C. Y., Huang, L.-H., Bryleva, E. Y., & Chang, T.-Y. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2567-14.2014 · Cited by 108
Structural basis for catalysis and substrate specificity of human ACAT1
Qian, H., Zhao, X., Yan, R., Yao, X., Gao, S., Sun, X., Du, X., Yang, H., Wong, C. C. L., & Yan, N. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2290-0 · Cited by 108
Yu, G., Liang, Y. S., Huang, Z., Jones, D. W., Pritchard, K. A., & Zhang, H. (2016) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0583-x · Cited by 103
Reversible Axonal Dystrophy by Calcium Modulation in Frataxin-Deficient Sensory Neurons of YG8R Mice
Mollá, B., Muñoz-Lasso, D. C., Riveiro, F., Bolinches-Amorós, A., Pallardó, F. V., Fernandez-Vilata, A., de la Iglesia-Vayá, M., Palau, F., & González‐Cabo, P. (2017) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00264 · Cited by 87
Shibuya, Y., Niu, Z., Bryleva, E. Y., Harris, B. T., Murphy, S. R., Kheirollah, A., Bowen, Z. D., Chang, C. C. Y., & Chang, T.-Y. (2015) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.002 · Cited by 87
Determinants of Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Lipid Droplet Protein Targeting
Olarte, M.-J., Kim, S., Sharp, M. E., Swanson, J. M. J., Farese, R. V., & Walther, T. C. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.001 · Cited by 85
TREM2‐dependent effects on microglia in Alzheimer's disease
Zhou, Y., Ulland, T. K., & Colonna, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00202 · Cited by 82
León, C., Hill, J. S., & Wasan, K. M. (2005) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-005-6306-0 · Cited by 77
Vilalta, A., Zhou, Y., Sevalle, J., Griffin, J. K., Satoh, K., Allendorf, D. H., De, S., Puigdellívol, M., Bruzas, A., Burguillos, M. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100631 · Cited by 77
Pharmacology of the AC AT Inhibitor Avasimibe (CI‐1011)
Llaverías, G., Laguna, J. C., & Alegret, M. (2003) · Cardiovascular Drug Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1527-3466.2003.tb00104.x · Cited by 77
Belsare, K. D., Wu, H., Mondal, D., Bond, A., Castillo, E., Jin, J., Jo, H., Roush, A. E., Pilla, K. B., Sali, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2114486119 · Cited by 68
TREM2 expression and amyloid‐beta phagocytosis in Alzheimer's disease
La Rosa, F., Agostini, S., Piancone, F., Marventano, I., Hernis, A., Fenoglio, C., Galimberti, D., Scarpini, E., Saresella, M., & Clerici, M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24108626 · Cited by 50
Novel insights into the multifaceted and tissue‐specific roles of the endocytic receptor LRP1
Yamamoto, K., Scilabra, S. D., Bonelli, S., Jensen, A., Scavenius, C., Enghild, J. J., & Strickland, D. K. (2024) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107521 · Cited by 47
Does soluble TREM2 protect against Alzheimer's disease?
Brown, G. C., & St George-Hyslop, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.834697 · Cited by 39
Melton, E. M., Li, H., Benson, J. A., Sohn, P., Huang, L.-H., Song, B., Li, B.-L., Chang, C. C. Y., & Chang, T. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.010564 · Cited by 32
Desai, A. A., Smith, M. D., Zhang, Y., Makowski, E. K., Gerson, J. E., Ionescu, E., Starr, C. G., Zupancic, J. M., Moore, S. J., Sutter, A. B., et al. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100508 · Cited by 31
Blocking cholesterol storage to treat Alzheimer's disease
Chang, T. Y., Chang, C. C. Y., Harned, T. C., De La Torre, A. L., Lee, J., Huynh, T. N., & Gow, J. G. (2021) · Exploration of Neuroprotective Therapy · doi:10.37349/ent.2021.00014 · Cited by 28
Na, H., Yang, J. B., Zhang, Z., Gan, Q., Tian, H., Rajab, I. M., Potempa, L. A., Tao, Q., & Qiu, W. Q. (2023) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.02.013 · Cited by 27
López-Farré, A. J., Sacristán, D., Zamorano‐León, J. J., San‐Martín, N., & Macaya, C. (2008) · Cardiovascular Drug Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00030.x · Cited by 24
Li, H., Huynh, T. N. T., Duong, M. T., Gow, J. G., Chang, C. C. Y., & Chang, T. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24065616 · Cited by 19
(2019) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvnwc0d0.18 · Cited by 18
Hutter-Paier, B., Huttunen, H. J., Puglielli, L., Eckman, C. B., Kim, D. Y., Hofmeister, A., Moir, R. D., Domnitz, S. B., Frosch, M. P., Windisch, M., et al. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.028 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qin, L., Wang, X., Liang, T., Bi, Y., Guo, Z., Li, W., & Liang, W. (2026) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102849 · Cited by 9
Huang, C., Deng, C., Gao, Z., Chen, C. L., Zheng, H., Yang, Y., & Wei, Y. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.75479 · Cited by 1
Li, Z., Ming, Q., Fu, L., Yang, J., Lv, Y., Chen, B., & Lu, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2026.1886340 · Cited by 1
Inflammatory alterations mediate tau-associated neurodegeneration
Lao, P. J., Lee, S., Talmasov, D., Dass, D., Chikwem, N., Johnson, A. S., Smith, A., Guzman, D., Okafor, A., Houlihan, H. M., et al. (2026) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag242 · Cited by 1
Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Variants Interact with Amyloid-Beta to Modulate Monocyte Function
Chatila, Z. K., & Bradshaw, E. M. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14241990
Agarwal, S., Popert, R., Agapow, P., Ruff, C. A., & Gupta, S. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.21.727002
Kamikubo, Y. (2026) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-026-06307-w
Glial lipid reprogramming in brain aging: Lipid identity, organelle stress, and redox vulnerability
Rana, M., Ko, W., Nepali, K., Ko, C.-Y., Yen, T., Jan, J., Taliyan, R., Li, C.-H., & Yang, C. (2026) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2026.104453
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovde, M. J., Maaser‐Hecker, A., Bae, J., & Tanzi, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tanzi, Rudolph E.
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e70879-e70879
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC12603916
- OpenAlex
- W4416133409
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund (T32 AG000222‐31)
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG000222)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Keywords
- ACAT1, SOAT1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review