Cited by 132Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Treating university students with social phobia and public speaking fears: internet delivered self-help with or without live group exposure sessions

Open access
Tillfors, Maria, Carlbring, Per, Furmark, Tomas, Lewenhaupt, Susanne, Spak, Maria, Eriksson, Anna, Westling, Bengt E., Andersson, Gerhard·2008·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the efficacy of an Internet-based self-help program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail for Swedish university students with social phobia and public speaking fears. The main objective was to test if the Internet-based self-help program would be more effective if five live group exposure sessions were added. METHODS: Thirty-eight students meeting the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition criteria for social phobia were randomized into two different treatment groups: Internet delivered cognitive behavior therapy combined with five group exposure sessions (ICBT+ exp) or the Internet program alone (ICBT). RESULTS: Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Both treatment groups showed significant improvement from pre- to post-test, and from pre-test to 1-year follow-up, on all measured dimensions (social anxiety, general anxiety, depression levels, and quality of life). For both the groups, the average within-group effect sizes for the primary social anxiety scales, expressed as Cohen's d, were comparable to those seen in traditionally administered cognitive behavioral therapy both at post-test and at 1- year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Internet-based self-help program on its own is efficient in the treatment of university students with social phobia. Adding group exposure sessions did not improve the outcome significantly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20416

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. 1998. SCID-I and SCID-II: interview protocol (in Swedish). Stockholm: Pilgrim Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tillfors, M., Carlbring, P., Furmark, T., Lewenhaupt, S., Spak, M., Eriksson, A., Westling, B. E., & Andersson, G.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Tillfors, Maria
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2008-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
708-717
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W1965570140
Cited by
132
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, social anxiety, public speaking anxiety, online self-help, cognitive behavioral therapy, university students, treatment efficacy, depression, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy, Self-Help Groups, Severity of Illness Index, Social Environment, Speech, Students, Universities, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review