Cited by 89Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Perineuronal nets of extracellular matrix around parvalbumin‐containing neurons of the hippocampus

Celio, Marco R.·1993·Hippocampus

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.1993.4500030709

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celio, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Celio, Marco R.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-10
Volume
3
Issue
S1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1599240209
Cited by
89
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
perineuronal nets, extracellular matrix, parvalbumin neurons, inhibitory interneurons, astrocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Hippocampus, Humans, Neurons, Parvalbumins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review