CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 510

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identification and characterization of ANKK1: A novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1

Neville, Matt J., Johnstone, Elaine C., Walton, Robert T.·2004·Human Mutation
DOI 10.1002/humu.20039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The dopamine D2 receptor has been extensively studied in relation to alcoholism, substance abuse, and nicotine dependence. The most frequently examined polymorphism linked to this gene is the Taq1A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (dbSNP rs1800497; g.32806C>T in GenBank AF050737.1), which has been associated with a reduction in D2 receptor density, although this is not universally accepted. The Taq1A RFLP lies 10 kB downstream of DRD2 and may therefore fall within a different coding region than the DRD2 gene or within a regulatory region. Within this downstream region, we have identified a novel kinase gene, named ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1 (ANKK1), which contains a single serine/threonine kinase domain and is expressed at low levels in placenta and whole spinal cord RNA. This gene is a member of an extensive family of proteins involved in signal transduction pathways. The DRD2 Taq1A RFLP is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that causes an amino acid substitution within the 11th ankyrin repeat of ANKK1 (p.Glu713Lys), which, while unlikely to affect structural integrity, may affect substrate-binding specificity. If this is the case, then changes in ANKK1 activity may provide an alternative explanation for previously described associations between the DRD2 Taq1A RFLP and neuropsychiatric disorders such as addiction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.20039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bennett, 1992, J Biol Chem, 267, 8703, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50333-7 · DOI
  2. Bork, 1993, Proteins, 17, 363, 10.1002/prot.340170405 · DOI
  3. Comings, 2000, Prog Brain Res, 126, 325, 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26022-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Goldman, 1998, Alcohol, 16, 47, 10.1016/S0741-8329(97)00176-6 · DOI
  5. Gorina, 1996, Science, 274, 1001, 10.1126/science.274.5289.1001 · DOI
  6. Hanks, 1995, FASEB J, 9, 576, 10.1096/fasebj.9.8.7768349 · DOI
  7. Hanks, 1991, Methods Enzymol, 200, 38, 10.1016/0076-6879(91)00126-H · DOI
  8. Hanukoglu, 1982, Cell, 31, 243, 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90424-X · DOI
  9. Hauge, 1991, Genomics, 10, 527, 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90431-D · DOI
  10. Hunter, 1991, Methods Enzymol, 200, 3, 10.1016/0076-6879(91)00125-G · DOI
  11. Jonsson, 1999, Mol Psychiatry, 4, 290, 10.1038/sj.mp.4000532 · DOI
  12. Kidd, 1998, Hum Genet, 103, 211, 10.1007/s004390050809 · DOI
  13. Laruelle, 1998, Mol Psychiatry, 3, 261, 10.1038/sj.mp.4000343 · DOI
  14. Manning, 2002, Science, 298, 1912, 10.1126/science.1075762 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Munaf�, 2004, Nicotine and Tobacco Research
  16. Noble, 1998, Alcohol, 16, 33, 10.1016/S0741-8329(97)00175-4 · DOI
  17. Pohjalainen, 1998, Mol Psychiatry, 3, 256, 10.1038/sj.mp.4000350 · DOI
  18. Wickens, 1984, Science, 226, 1045, 10.1126/science.6208611 · DOI
  19. Wilusz, 1989, Nucleic Acids Res, 17, 3899, 10.1093/nar/17.10.3899 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neville, M. J., Johnstone, E. C., & Walton, R. T.
Venue
Human Mutation
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Published
2004
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
540-545
ISSN
  • 1059-7794
  • 1098-1004
DOI
10.1002/humu.20039
Cited by
510
References
0
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 4261 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review