Cited by 9,297Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout ResearchWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study

Open access
Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Bakker, Arnold B.·2004·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

This study focuses on burnout and its positive antipode—engagement. A model is tested in which burnout and engagement have different predictors and different possible consequences. Structural equation modeling was used to simultaneously analyze data from four independent occupational samples (total N = 1698). Results confirm the hypothesized model indicating that: (1) burnout and engagement are negatively related, sharing between 10 per cent and 25 per cent of their variances; (2) burnout is mainly predicted by job demands but also by lack of job resources, whereas engagement is exclusively predicted by available job resources; (3) burnout is related to health problems as well as to turnover intention, whereas engagement is related only to the latter; (4) burnout mediates the relationship between job demands and health problems, whereas engagement mediates the relationship between job resources and turnover intention. The fact that burnout and engagement exhibit different patterns of possible causes and consequences implies that different intervention strategies should be used when burnout is to be reduced or engagement is to be enhanced. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.248

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Arbuckle J. L., 1997, Amos users' guide version 4.0
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  3. DeCharms R., 1968, Personal causation
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.803 · DOI
  5. Green D. E., 1991, The three‐factor structure of the Maslach burnout inventory, Journal of Science Behavior and Personality, 6, 453
  6. Hackman J. R., 1980, Work redesign
  7. Jöreskog K. G., 1986, LISREL user guide version VI
  8. 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322 · DOI
  9. Karasek R. A., 1985, Job content questionnaire and user's guide
  10. Knardahl S., 1985, Psychophysiology of cardiovasculair control, 151
  11. Maslach C., 1986, Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual
  12. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56 · DOI
  13. Nunnaly J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory
  14. Schaufeli W. B., 2001, Werk en welbevinden: naar een positieve benadering in de Arbeids‐ en Gezondheidspsychologie, Gedrag & Organisatie, 14, 229
  15. Schaufeli W. B., 2000, Handleiding van de Utrechtse Burnout Schaal (UBOS)
  16. Schaufeli W. B., 1996, The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Test manual, 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,041

Metadata

Authors
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-30
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
293-315
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2153610778
Cited by
9,297
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 601 · 2025: 667 · 2024: 685 · 2023: 676 · 2022: 770 · 2021: 731 · 2020: 650 · 2019: 580 · 2018: 507 · 2017: 481 · 2016: 445 · 2015: 427 · 2014: 447 · 2013: 396 · 2012: 325
FWCI
116.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
burnout, work engagement, job demands, job resources, occupational health, turnover intention, mediation, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review