Cited by 93Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

On Self–Love and Outgroup Hate: Opposite Effects of Narcissism on Prejudice via Social Dominance Orientation and Right–Wing Authoritarianism

Open access
Cichocka, Aleksandra, Dhont, Kristof, Makwana, Arti P.·2017·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

Previous research has obtained mixed findings as to whether feelings of self–worth are positively or negatively related to right–wing ideological beliefs and prejudice. We propose to clarify the link between self–worth and ideology by distinguishing between narcissistic and non–narcissistic self–evaluations as well as between different dimensions of ideological attitudes. Four studies, conducted in three different socio–political contexts: the UK (Study 1, N = 422), the US (Studies 2 and 3, N s = 471 and 289, respectively), and Poland (Study 4, N = 775), investigated the associations between narcissistic and non–narcissistic self–evaluations, social dominance orientation (SDO), right–wing authoritarianism (RWA), and ethnic prejudice. Confirming our hypotheses, the results consistently showed that after controlling for self–esteem, narcissistic self–evaluation was positively associated with SDO (accounting for RWA), yet negatively associated with RWA (accounting for SDO). These associations were similar after controlling for psychopathy and Machiavellianism (Study 3) as well as collective narcissism and Big Five personality characteristics (Study 4). Studies 2–4 additionally demonstrated that narcissistic self–evaluation was indirectly positively associated with prejudice through higher SDO (free of RWA) but indirectly negatively associated with prejudice through lower RWA (free of SDO). Implications for understanding the role of self–evaluation in right–wing ideological attitudes and prejudice are discussed. Copyright © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Personality published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Personality Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.2114

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once collective narcissism is removed, positive ingroup identification is often related to outgroup tolerance.

    “Once collective narcissism is removed, positive ingroup identification is often related to outgroup tolerance (Cichocka, Dhont, & Makwana, 2017;Golec de Zavala et al., 2013a, 2016, 2017, 2019a).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Cichocka, Dhont, & Makwana, 2017

    Study 4 controls for collective narcissism, but examines individual narcissism rather than positive ingroup identification. The General Discussion reports mixed links between individual narcissism and ethnic prejudice; it does not establish that positive ingroup identification is related to outgroup tolerance after collective narcissism is removed. I searched for ingroup identification and tolerance in that context. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self‐esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317– 334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180403. · DOI
  2. Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67– 87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110382845. 20876550 · DOI
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right‐wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba press.
  4. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47– 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065‐2601(08)60382‐2. · DOI
  5. Ang, R. P., & Yusof, N. (2006). Development and initial validation of the narcissistic personality questionnaire for children: A preliminary investigation using school‐based Asian samples. Educational Psychology, 26, 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500340942. · DOI
  6. Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324– 340. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.746. · DOI
  7. Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Marchlewska, M., & Winiewski, M. (2015). When authoritarians confront prejudice. Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38, 87– 99. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12313. · DOI
  8. Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2008). “My group is not worthy of me”: Narcissism and ethnocentrism. Political Psychology, 29, 437– 453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2008.00638.x. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. NY: Free Press.
  10. Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638– 656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006. 18029072 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies In Sedikides C., & Spencer S. J. (Eds.), The self (pp. 115– 138). New York: Psychology Press.
  12. Carnahan, T., & McFarland, S. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: Could participant self‐selection have led to the cruelty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603– 614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292689. 17440210 · DOI
  13. Cichocka, A., Bilewicz, M., Jost, J. T., Marrouch, N., & Witkowska, M. (2016). On the grammar of politics—Or why conservatives prefer nouns. Political Psychology, 37, 799– 815. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12327. · DOI
  14. Cichocka, A., & Dhont, K. (in press). The personality bases of political ideology and behavior In Zeigler‐Hill V., & Shackelford T. K. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. London: SAGE.
  15. Cichocka, A., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in Capitalist and post‐Communist societies. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 6– 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12011. 24811719 · DOI
  16. Cichocka, A., Golec de Zavala, A., Marchlewska, M., Bilewicz, M., Jaworska, M., & Olechowski, M. (in press). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non‐narcissistic in‐group positivity. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12328. 28542910 · DOI
  17. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2016). Does self‐love or self‐hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self‐esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 157– 166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170. · DOI
  18. Cunningham, W. A., Nezlek, J. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1332– 1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264654. 15466605 · DOI
  19. Dhont, K., & Hodson, G. (2014). Why do right‐wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12– 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002. · DOI
  20. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61‐62, 105– 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020. · DOI
  21. Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD‐HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507– 522.
  22. Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2005). Low self‐esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16, 328– 335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956‐7976.2005.01535.x. 15828981 · DOI
  23. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual‐process cognitive‐motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41– 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065‐2601(01)80004‐6. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right‐wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism–conservatism–traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685– 715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2010.00781.x. · DOI
  25. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113– 130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614. · DOI
  26. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual‐process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861– 1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6494.2010.00672.x. 21039534 · DOI
  27. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463– 482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526. · DOI
  28. Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self‐views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469– 486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092‐6566(03)00026‐6. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right‐wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195– 218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2005.00415.x. · DOI
  30. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199– 216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., & Bilewicz, M. (2013). The paradox of in‐group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in‐group and out‐group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 16– 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6494.2012.00779.x. 22329421 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R., & Jayawickreme, N. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074– 1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904. 19968420 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., & Iskra‐Golec, I. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in‐group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019– 1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032215. 23586408 · DOI
  34. Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., et al. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta‐analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 261– 310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038231. 25546498 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Grosz, M. P., Emons, W. H. M., Wetzel, E., Leckelt, M., Chopik, W. J., Rose, N., & Back, M. D. (in press). A comparison of unidimensionality and measurement precision of the narcissistic personality inventory and the narcissistic admiration and rivalry questionnaire. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116686686. 29214860 · DOI
  36. Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686– 690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005. · DOI
  37. Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015). The person‐based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1– 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28– 41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105. 24322012 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino‐Browne, E., & Correll, J. (2003). Secure and defensive high self‐esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969– 978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.85.5.969. 14599258 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1– 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044‐8309.1994.tb01008.x. · DOI
  41. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307– 337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600. 19035826 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kandler, C., Bell, E., & Riemann, E. (2016). The structure and sources of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Personality, 30, 406– 420. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2061. · DOI
  43. Kernis, M. H., Lakey, C. E., & Heppner, W. L. (2008). Secure versus fragile high self‐esteem as a predictor of verbal defensiveness: Converging findings across three different markers. Journal of Personality, 76, 477– 512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6494.2008.00493.x. 18447858 · DOI
  44. Kernis, M. H., & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between secure and fragile forms of high self‐esteem In Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self‐determination research (pp. 339– 360). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  45. Konrath, S., Meier, B., Bushman, B., & Jelte, M. W. (2014). Development and validation of the single item narcissism scale (SINS). PloS One, 9 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103469. PMC4122388 25093508 · DOI
  46. Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501– 518. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162‐895X.00338. · DOI
  47. Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. (in press). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018. 28132598 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463– 493. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2266. · DOI
  49. Locke, K. D. (2009). Aggression, narcissism, self‐esteem, and the attribution of desirable and humanizing traits to self versus others. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 99– 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.003. · DOI
  50. Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328– 341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562. 16880283 PMC3152746 · DOI · Paper page
  51. MacInnis, C. C., Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Hodson, G. (2013). The happy cyclist: Examining the association between generalized authoritarianism and subjective well‐being. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 789– 793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.018. · DOI
  52. Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross‐national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031– 1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170. 24841103 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Marchlewska, M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). An autobiographical gateway: Narcissists avoid first‐person visual perspective while retrieving self‐threatening memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 157– 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.003. · DOI
  54. McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52, 27– 45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953011. · DOI
  55. McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453– 477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2010.00765.x. · DOI
  56. Meeusen, C., & Dhont, K. (2015). Parent–child similarity in common and specific components of prejudice: The role of ideological attitudes and political discussion. European Journal of Personality, 29, 585– 598. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2011. · DOI
  57. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Vize, C., Crowe, M., Sleep, C., Maples‐Keller, J. L., … Campbell, W. K. (in press). Vulnerable narcissism is (mostly) a disorder of neuroticism. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12303. 28170100 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user's guide (sixth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen and Muthen.
  59. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565– 572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2008.02124.x. 18578846 · DOI
  60. O'Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83, 644– 664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126. 25168647 · DOI
  61. Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2013). The relationship between right‐wing ideological attitudes and psychological well‐being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 509– 522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213478199. 23436768 · DOI
  62. Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., & Pattyn, S. (2013). Internal and external threat in relationship with right‐wing attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 233– 248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12011. 23072354 · DOI
  63. Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57– 75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741– 763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.67.4.741. · DOI
  65. Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159– 162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4502_10. 16370732 · DOI
  66. Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. (1991). Narcissism, self‐esteem, and defensive self‐enhancement. Journal of Personality, 59, 20– 38. 2037962
  67. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal‐components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890– 902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.54.5.890. 3379585 · DOI
  68. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self‐esteem: Construct validation of a single‐item measure and the Rosenberg self‐esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151– 161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self‐image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  70. Schnieders, T. C., & Gore, J. S. (2011). We don't want your kind here: When people high in narcissism show prejudice against immigrants. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 175– 193. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099265. · DOI
  71. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta‐analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248– 279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226. 18641385 · DOI
  72. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Sniderman, P. M. (1975). Personality and democratic politics. California: University of California Press.
  74. Sniderman, P. M., & Citrin, J. (1971). Psychological sources of political belief: Self‐esteem and isolationist attitudes. The American Political Science Review, 65, 401– 417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954457. · DOI
  75. Soenens, B., & Duriez, B. (2012). Does conservatism have a self‐esteem enhancing function? An examination of associations with contingent self‐worth and ill‐being in late adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 728– 732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.037. · DOI
  76. Stoeber, J., Kobori, O., & Brown, A. (2014). Examining mutual suppression effects in the assessment of perfectionism cognitions: Evidence supporting multidimensional assessment. Assessment, 21, 647– 660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114534884. 24830512 · DOI
  77. Stronge, S., Cichocka, A., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Narcissistic self‐esteem or optimal self‐esteem? A latent profile analysis of self‐esteem and psychological entitlement. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 102– 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.016. · DOI
  78. Turner, R. N., Dhont, K., Hewstone, M., Prestwich, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2014). The role of personality factors in the reduction of intergroup anxiety and amelioration of outgroup attitudes via intergroup contact. European Journal of Personality, 28, 180– 192. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1927. · DOI
  79. Van Hiel, A., & Brebels, L. (2011). Conservatism is good for you: Cultural conservatism protects self‐esteem in older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 120– 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.002. · DOI
  80. Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21, 131– 148. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.618. · DOI
  81. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323– 2344. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.618. · DOI
  82. Weber, C., & Federico, C. M. (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology, 28, 389– 416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9221.2007.00579.x. · DOI
  83. Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
  84. Wojcik, S. P., Hovasapian, A., Graham, J., Motyl, M., & Ditto, P. H. (2015). Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness. Science, 347, 1243– 1246. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260817. 25766233 · DOI
  85. Wojciszke, B. (2005). The negative social world: Polish culture of complaining. International Journal of Sociology, 34, 38– 59 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20628726.
  86. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin‐Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross‐group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73– 90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐3514.73.1.73. · DOI
  87. Zeigler‐Hill, V., Clark, C. B., & Pickard, J. D. (2008). Narcissistic subtypes and contingent self‐esteem: Do all narcissists base their self‐esteem on the same domains? Journal of Personality, 76, 753– 774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6494.2008.00503.x. 18482357 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Zitek, E. M., & Jordan, A. H. (2016). Narcissism predicts support for hierarchy (at least when narcissists think they can rise to the top). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 707– 716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616649241. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cichocka, A., Dhont, K., & Makwana, A. P.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Cichocka, Aleksandra
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2017-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
366-384
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W2733489478
Cited by
93
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
20.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
narcissism, self-worth, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, prejudice, ethnic prejudice, right-wing ideology, self-esteem, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, collective narcissism, Big Five personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review