Cited by 188Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

For whom may participation in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program be contraindicated?

Dobkin, Patricia L., Irving, Julie A., Amar, Simon·2012·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-011-0079-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Until recently, only a few overview and opinion papers on the potential types of distress associated with meditation in clinical research and practice have been published.

    “Until recently, only a few overview and opinion papers [71–76] on the potential types of distress associated with meditation in the context of clinical research and practice have been published.”
  • The literature has acknowledged a bias towards exaggerating the clinical benefits of meditation practice and dismissing its potential adverse effects.

    “Yet it has taken almost four decades of research before the literature acknowledged that there might be a bias towards exaggerating the clinical benefits of meditation practice and dismissing its potential adverse effects (4 -6).”
  • Many participants in mindfulness-based interventions struggle to meet home practice requirements of about 30-45 minutes daily and say they lack time to fit practice into their routines.

    “Many participants experience difficulty meeting practice requirements (around 30–45 minutes per day), and report that they lack the time to integrate mindfulness practice into their daily routines (Dobkin et al., 2012; Kabat-Zinn et al., 2017; Lomas et al., 2015; Wyatt et al., 2014).”
  • Randomized Control Trial studies do not usually report possible UEs, so there is no information about their prevalence.

    “Regarding MBIs, Randomized Control Trial studies do not usually report possible UEs, and therefore we have no information about their prevalence [13].”
  • There is a lack of data about possible UEs of meditation practices.

    “Despite the long-term use and evidence-based efficacy of meditation and mindfulness-based interventions, there is still a lack of data about the possible unwanted effects (UEs) of these practices.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobkin, P. L., Irving, J. A., & Amar, S.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Dobkin, Patricia L.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2011-10-06
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2014864567
Cited by
188
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, contraindications, adverse effects, attrition, dropout, meditation, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, risk of harm, adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review