Cited by 221Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Effects of healthy aging on the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose assessed with statistical parametric mapping

Petit-Taboué, M.C., Landeau, B., Desson, J.F., Desgranges, B., Baron, J.C.·1998·NeuroImage

Abstract

The aging process is thought to result in changes in synaptic activity reflecting both functional and structural cell derangement. However, previous PET reports on age-related changes in resting brain glucose utilization (CMRglc) have been discrepant, presumably because of methodological as well as subject screening differences. In contrast to other studies, which used a region of interest approach, the objective of the present work was to determine, by means of the SPM software, the changes in regional CMRglc as a function of age in 24 optimally healthy, unmedicated volunteers of ages from 20 to 67 years. Global CMRglc showed a significant decline with age (approximately 6% per decade, P < 0.05), which concerned all the voxels studied save for most of the occipital cortex and part of the cerebellum. The most significant effects (P < 0.001) concerned the association neocortex in perisylvian temporoparietal and anterior temporal areas, the insula, the inferior and posterior-lateral frontal regions, the anterior cingulate cortex, the head of caudate nucleus, and the anterior thalamus, in a bilateral and essentially symmetrical fashion. The high posterior parietal cortex was not sampled in this study. This distribution of changes in CMRglc with age may differ from that seen in Alzheimer' disease, where the earliest metabolic reduction has been shown to affect the posterior cingulate cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.1997.0318

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petit-Taboué, M. C., Landeau, B., Desson, J. F., Desgranges, B., & Baron, J. C.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
176-184
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025767657
Cited by
221
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
healthy aging, regional cerebral glucose metabolism, cerebral metabolic rate of glucose, brain aging, association cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, frontal cortex, thalamus, caudate nucleus, occipital cortex, cerebellum, Alzheimer's disease comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Blood Glucose, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Mathematical Computing, Middle Aged, Software, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review