The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 · Cited by 2,573
Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258646 · Cited by 2,057
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506 · Cited by 1,506
Cited by
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A review.
Harrison, Y., & Horne, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.6.3.236 · Cited by 1,238
Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051 · Cited by 841
Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314525202 · Cited by 762
Personality and domain‐specific risk taking
Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton‐O'Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/1366987032000123856 · Cited by 761
When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts.
van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918 · Cited by 567
When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects
JACHIMOWICZ, J. M., DUNCAN, S., WEBER, E. U., & JOHNSON, E. J. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.43 · Cited by 481
Rung, J. M., & Madden, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000462 · Cited by 358
Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213 · Cited by 317
Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions.
Steel, P. D., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.96 · Cited by 309
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Kvarven, A., Strømland, E., & Johannesson, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z · Cited by 271
Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective
McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00036-2 · Cited by 221
Shallow Gamification: Testing Psychological Effects of Framing an Activity as a Game
Lieberoth, A. (2015) · Games and Culture · doi:10.1177/1555412014559978 · Cited by 208
Williams, D. J., & Noyes, J. M. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500484419 · Cited by 179
Is cognitive case formulation science or science fiction?
Bieling, P. J., & Kuyken, W. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.10.1.52 · Cited by 174
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034910 · Cited by 170
Decision framing: moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing
Simon, A. F., Fagley, N. S., & Halleran, J. G. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.463 · Cited by 150
The impact of choice architecture on sustainable consumer behavior: the role of guilt
Theotokis, A., & Manganari, E. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4 · Cited by 129
Culture and the Home-Field Disadvantage
Medin, D., Bennis, W., & Chandler, M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610388772 · Cited by 122
The effects of insula damage on decision-making for risky gains and losses
Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. (2009) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910902934400 · Cited by 119
Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values
Haagsma, J. A., Polinder, S., Cassini, A., Colzani, E., & Havelaar, A. H. (2014) · Population Health Metrics · doi:10.1186/s12963-014-0020-2 · Cited by 105
Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation
Kuvaas, B., & Selart, M. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.001 · Cited by 97
The effects of the framing of time on delay discounting
DeHart, W. B., & Odum, A. L. (2015) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.125 · Cited by 90
Representativeness and Response Validity Across Nine Opt-In Online Samples
Stagnaro, M. N., Druckman, J., Berinsky, A. J., Arechar, A. A., Willer, R., & Rand, D. G. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/h9j2d · Cited by 68
Determinants of Risk Taking in a Dynamic Uncertain Context
Slattery, J. P., & Ganster, D. C. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630202800106 · Cited by 49
Sheffer, L., & Loewen, P. J. (2019) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912918775252 · Cited by 33
A Negativity Bias in Reframing Shapes Political Preferences Even in Partisan Contexts
Boydstun, A. E., Ledgerwood, A., & Sparks, J. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617733520 · Cited by 31
Pain and social decision-making: New insights from the social framing effect
Gu, R., Liu, J., & Cui, F. (2019) · Brain Science Advances · doi:10.26599/bsa.2019.9050020 · Cited by 18
What makes an idea risky? The relations between perceptions of idea novelty, usefulness, and risk
Keith, M. G., Freier, L. M., Childers, M., Ponce‐Pore, I., & Brooks, S. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.621 · Cited by 7
Mixed Frames and Risky Decision-Making
Peng, J., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Zeng, Z., Mai, Y., & Miao, D. (2017) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294117717732 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kühberger, A.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-55
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998740918
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
