How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, Lichtenstein, Sarah, Read, Stephen, Combs, Barbara·1978·Policy Sciences

DOI 10.1007/bf00143739

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00143739

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Perception of Risk
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Self-citation
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Self-citation
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x · Cited by 2,740
Self-citation
The Affect Heuristic
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Self-citation
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649
Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict
Dickman, A. J. (2010) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x · Cited by 1,590
The affect heuristic
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citation
Risk Perception and Affect
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x · Cited by 1,443
Self-citation
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories
Taherdoost, H. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 · Cited by 1,162
A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit
Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x · Cited by 1,151
Self-citation
Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability.
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758
Applied artificial intelligence and trust—the case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices
Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014 · Cited by 661
Risk governance
van Asselt, M. B. A., & Renn, O. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.553730 · Cited by 420
On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming?
Verplanken, B., Marks, E., & Dobromir, A. I. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101528 · Cited by 414
Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12062 · Cited by 410
Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?
de Kerviler, G., Demoulin, N. T. M., & Zidda, P. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011 · Cited by 374
Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology
Savadori, L., Savio, S., Nicotra, E., Rumiati, R., Finucane, M., & Slovic, P. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00526.x · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Rationality
Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213 · Cited by 317
Understanding the new post-COVID-19 risk scenario: Outlooks and challenges for a new era of tourism
Villacé-Molinero, T., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., Orea-Giner, A., & Fuentes-Moraleda, L. (2021) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104324 · Cited by 250
Accident prevention. Presentation of a model placing emphasis on human, structural and cultural factors
Lund, J., & Aarø, L. E. (2004) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00045-6 · Cited by 243
How does our perception of risk influence decision-making? Implications for the design of risk information
Williams, D. J., & Noyes, J. M. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500484419 · Cited by 179
Mental Contamination and the Debiasing Problem
Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., & Brekke, N. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.012 · Cited by 160
Risk Perception in Poland: A Comparison with three other countries
Goszczynska, M., Tyszka, T., & Slovlc, P. (1991) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960040305 · Cited by 149
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Distal factors in risk perception
Sjöberg, L. (2003) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/1366987032000088847 · Cited by 144
What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter
So, J., Prestin, A., Lee, L., Wang, Y., Yen, J., & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.940675 · Cited by 123
The Informed Society: An Analysis of the Public's Information‐Seeking Behavior Regarding Coastal Flood Risks
Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., & De Maeyer, P. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01743.x · Cited by 113
What Do We Know About Making Risk Comparisons?
Roth, E., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Lave, L., & Bostrom, A. (1990) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00520.x · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Worry, Risk Perception, and Controllability Predict Intentions Toward COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors
Sobkow, A., Zaleskiewicz, T., Petrova, D., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Traczyk, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720 · Cited by 106
A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles
Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., Stares, S., Akyelken, N., Cavoli, C., Day, J., Dickinson, J., Fors, V., Hopkins, D., Lyons, G., et al. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133 · Cited by 97
Public perception and communication of scientific uncertainty.
Broomell, S. B., & Kane, P. B. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000260 · Cited by 64
Aviation Risk Perception: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices
Thomson, M. E., Önkal, D., Avcioğlu, A., & Goodwin, P. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00552.x · Cited by 62
Tools for comparative analysis of alternatives: Competing or complementary perspectives?
Hofstetter, P., Bare, J. C., Hammitt, J. K., Murphy, P. A., & Rice, G. E. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00255 · Cited by 58
Limits to deployment of nuclear power for decarbonization: Insights from public opinion
Abdulla, A., Vaishnav, P., Sergi, B., & Victor, D. G. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.039 · Cited by 50
Factors influencing fire, earthquake, and cyclone risk perception in Yangon, Myanmar
Fernandez, G., Tun, A. M., Okazaki, K., Zaw, S. H., & Kyaw, K. (2018) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.028 · Cited by 48
When climate change adaptation becomes a “looming threat” to society: Exploring views and responses to California wildfires and public safety power shutoffs
Wong-Parodi, G. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101757 · Cited by 48
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Health Message Generation: The Folic Acid Message Engine
Schmälzle, R., & Wilcox, S. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28858 · Cited by 43
Developing communication strategies for mitigating actions against global warming: linking framing and a dual processing model
Shih, T.-J., & Lin, C.-Y. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1154886 · Cited by 23
Untitled work
(2014) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 18
Microplastics in food and drink: Predictors of public risk perceptions and support for plastic-reducing policies based on a climate change framework
Fian, L., Felt, U., Hofmann, T., White, M. P., & Pahl, S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102583 · Cited by 8
The temporal dynamics of public attention to aviation safety events
Sun, J., Dou, Z., & Gao, Y. (2026) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2026.05.003 · Cited by 1

Authors: Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B.
Venue: Policy Sciences
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1978-04
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
Pages: 127-152
ISSN: 0032-2687 (ISSN-L)
1573-0891
DOI: 10.1007/bf00143739
OpenAlex: W2138502710
Cited by: 2,834
References: 0
FWCI: 73.60
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review