The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Towards an understanding of inequity
Adams, J. S. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040968 · Cited by 5,146
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 1×
“Deutsch (1975) and Leventhal (1976; 1980) made important conceptual contributions to the issue of procedural justice in allocation situations.”
BackgroundNew directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978) · California Law Review · doi:10.2307/3480099 · Cited by 737
Cited by
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002 · Cited by 5,435
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926624 · Cited by 4,971
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x · Cited by 2,977
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 · Cited by 2,208
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256489 · Cited by 1,704
Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems
Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190200900105 · Cited by 1,521
The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior
Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(97)90003-8 · Cited by 1,394
The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective
Gilliland, S. W. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258595 · Cited by 1,185
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.
Greenberg, J. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.2.340 · Cited by 855
Core Self-Evaluations: A Review and Evaluation of the Literature
Chang, C.-H. (., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311419661 · Cited by 608
Audrey Korsgaard, M. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90004-7 · Cited by 561
Relationships between Bases of Power and Work Reactions: The Mediational Role of Procedural Justice
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N. J., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80072-5 · Cited by 469
Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatment
Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1999) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534819910255306 · Cited by 317
From Glass Ceiling to Glass Cliff: Women in Senior Executive Service
Sabharwal, M. (2015) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mut030 · Cited by 289
The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes
Bretz, R. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90001-9 · Cited by 276
Designing fair AI for managing employees in organizations: a review, critique, and design agenda
Robert, L. P., Pierce, C., Marquis, L., Kim, S., & Alahmad, R. (2020) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1735391 · Cited by 268
Organizational Justice and Job Outcomes: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethic
Khan, K., Abbas, M., Gul, A., & Raja, U. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1937-2 · Cited by 259
Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37003-1 · Cited by 253
Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1977729 · Cited by 251
Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior
Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Yildiz, S. B. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.006 · Cited by 221
What’s the Appeal? Perceptions of Review Processes for Algorithmic Decisions
Lyons, H., Wijenayake, S., Miller, T., & Velloso, E. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517606 · Cited by 27
Motivating organizational commitment in hotels: The relationship between leaders and employees
Chiang, C.-F., & Lin, M.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/15332845.2016.1148570 · Cited by 19
Transparency Fallacy: Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Management
Mirbabaie, M., Langer, M., Rieskamp, J., & Hofeditz, L. (2026) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-025-00963-1 · Cited by 17
Procedural Processes and Legal Institutions
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1991) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2629-6_5 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M.
- Venue
- Social Justice Research
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-198
- ISSN
- 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6725
- OpenAlex
- W1974137161
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.