Cited by 1,040Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine

Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods

Open access
Ash, Caerwyn, Dubec, Michael, Donne, Kelvin, Bashford, Tim·2017·Lasers in Medical Science

Abstract

Penetration depth of ultraviolet, visible light and infrared radiation in biological tissue has not previously been adequately measured. Risk assessment of typical intense pulsed light and laser intensities, spectral characteristics and the subsequent chemical, physiological and psychological effects of such outputs on vital organs as consequence of inappropriate output use are examined. This technical note focuses on wavelength, illumination geometry and skin tone and their effect on the energy density (fluence) distribution within tissue. Monte Carlo modelling is one of the most widely used stochastic methods for the modelling of light transport in turbid biological media such as human skin. Using custom Monte Carlo simulation software of a multi-layered skin model, fluence distributions are produced for various non-ionising radiation combinations. Fluence distributions were analysed using Matlab mathematical software. Penetration depth increases with increasing wavelength with a maximum penetration depth of 5378 μm calculated. The calculations show that a 10-mm beam width produces a fluence level at target depths of 1-3 mm equal to 73-88% (depending on depth) of the fluence level at the same depths produced by an infinitely wide beam of equal incident fluence. Meaning little additional penetration is achieved with larger spot sizes. Fluence distribution within tissue and thus the treatment efficacy depends upon the illumination geometry and wavelength. To optimise therapeutic techniques, light-tissue interactions must be thoroughly understood and can be greatly supported by the use of mathematical modelling techniques.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10103-017-2317-4

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [3]Ash C (2009) Optimising output dosimetry of a broadband pulsed light source for the removal of unwanted hair, PhD Thesis. (Unpublished)
  2. [12]Saladin K Human anatomy 2007 1 Quezon City McGraw-Hill
  3. [17]Barnes C A (2011) Review of optical and physical coefficients for modelling light tissue interaction, MSc Thesis. (Unpublished)
  4. [22]Lakowizc J, Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, volume 1. 3rd ed. New York. Springer; 2010.
  5. [25]van Gemert M Jacques S Sterenborg HJ Star WM Skin optics IEEETrans Biomed Eng 1989 36 12 1146 1154 10.1109/10.42108 2606488 · DOI
  6. [30]Goldberg D (2011) Laser dermatology: pearls and problems. 1st ed. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey
  7. [33]Brenning MAHV The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin Photochem Photobiol 2008 84 3 539 549 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00226.x 18435612 PMC2671032 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ash, C., Dubec, M., Donne, K., & Bashford, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Ash, Caerwyn
Venue
Lasers in Medical Science
Published
2017-09-12
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1909-1918
ISSN
  • 0268-8921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-604X
OpenAlex
W2755519984
Cited by
1,040
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
41.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lasers in Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Wales Trinity St. David
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Keywords
light penetration depth, wavelength dependence, beamwidth, fluence distribution, light-tissue interaction, Monte Carlo simulation, ultraviolet radiation, visible light, infrared radiation, intense pulsed light, laser safety, skin tone, illumination geometry, non-ionizing radiation
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Humans, Lasers, Light, Melanins, Monte Carlo Method, Oxyhemoglobins, Scattering, Radiation, Skin, Skin Absorption, Software, Water, Photons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review