Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption

Hassan, Louise M., Shiu, Edward, Shaw, Deirdre·2016·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitude, personality, and behaviour. Chicago: Dorsey.
  2. Andorfer, V. A., & Liebe, U. (2012). Research on fair trade consumption—A review. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 415–435. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Annunziata, A., Ianuario, S., & Pascale, P. (2011). Consumers’ attitudes toward labelling of ethical products: The case of organic and fair trade products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 17, 518–535. · DOI
  4. Arbuthnot, J., & Lingg, S. (1975). A comparison of French and American environmental behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 275–281. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bagozzi, R., & Dholakia, U. M. (1999). Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 63, 19–32. · doi:10.2307/1252098 · Paper page
  6. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 190–203. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Barber, N., Taylor, D. C., & Deale, C. S. (2010). Wine tourism, environmental concerns, and purchase intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27, 146–165. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Blue, C. L. (1995). The predictive capacity of theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour in exercise research: An integrated literature review. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 105–121. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Boldero, J. (1995). The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: The role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 440–462. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bowman, C. H., & Fishbein, M. (1978). Understanding public reaction to energy proposals: An application of the Fishbein model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 319–340. · DOI
  11. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk the talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y. (2001). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14, 9–40. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chu, P., & Chiu, J. (2003). Factors influencing household waste recycling behavior: Test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 604–626. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · Paper page
  15. Dahm, M. J., Samonte, A. V., & Shows, A. R. (2009). Organic foods: Do eco-friendly attitudes predict eco-friendly behaviors? Journal of American College Health, 58, 195–202. · DOI
  16. Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 2, 29–113. · DOI · Paper page
  17. de Vet, E., Gebhardt, W. A., Sinnige, J., Puffelen, A. V., Van Lettow, B., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2011). Implementation intentions for buying, carrying, discussion and using condoms: The role of the quality of plans. Health Education Research, 26, 443–455. · DOI
  18. Dickson, M. A. (2001). Utility of no sweat labels for apparel consumers: Profiling label-users and predicting their purchases. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 96–119. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fielding, K., Terry, D., Bordia, P., Hogg, M., & Masser, B. (2003). Explaining rural landholders’ use of sustainable practices: The role of attitudes, norms, and the intergroup context. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 42.
  20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. G. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Gill, J. D., Crosby, A. L., & Taylor, J. R. (1986). Ecological concern, attitudes, and social norms in voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 537–554. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions (Vol. 4). Chichester: Wiley.
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  25. Henningsen, M. L. M., Valde, K. S., Russell, G. A., & Russell, G. R. (2011). Student–faculty interactions about disappointing grades: Application of the goals–plans–actions model and the theory of planned behavior. Communication Education, 60, 174–190. · DOI
  26. Jägel, T., Keeling, K., Reppel, A., & Gruber, T. (2012). Individual values and motivational complexities in ethical clothing consumption: A means-end approach. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 373–396. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 586–603. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kirk, D., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (2011). Self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining: Goals and plans help accepting unfair but profitable offers. Social Cognition, 29, 528–546. · DOI
  29. Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 574–586. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ma, Y. J., Littrell, M. A., & Niehm, L. (2012). Young female consumers’ intentions toward fair trade consumption. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40, 41–63. · DOI
  31. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 667–683. · DOI
  32. McEachern, M., Schröder, M. J. A., Willock, J., Whitelock, J., & Mason, R. (2007). Exploring ethical brand extensions and consumer buying behaviour: The RSPCA and the “freedom food” brand. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16, 168–177. · DOI
  33. Mintel, (2009). Ethical clothing—UK. London: Mintel International Group Limited.
  34. Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2010). Do you have a voting plan?: Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychological Science, 21, 194–199. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Nigbur, D., Evanthia, L., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 259–284. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Ginieis, M. (2011). Towards a holistic approach of the attitude behaviour gap in ethical consumer behaviours: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Advances in Economic Research, 17, 77–88. · DOI
  37. Perugini, M., & Conner, M. (2000). Predicting and understanding behavioral volitions: The interplay between goals and behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 705–731. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Reuter, T., Ziegelmann, J. P., Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Schuz, B., & Aiken, L. S. (2010). Planning bridges the intention–behaviour gap: Age makes a difference and strategy use explains why. Psychology and Health, 25, 873–887. · DOI
  39. Rhodes, R. E., Blanchard, C. M., & Matheson, D. H. (2006). A multicomponent model of the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 119–137. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Rhodes, R. E., & Dickau, L. (2012). Experimental evidence for the intention–behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 31, 724–727. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Richetin, J., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2011). Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 40–54. · DOI
  42. Rise, J., Kovac, V., Kraft, P., & Moan, I. S. (2008). Predicting the intention to quit smoking and quitting behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 291–310. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rise, J., Thompson, M., & Verplanken, B. (2003). Measuring implementation intentions in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87–95. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Rodgers, W. M., Conner, M., & Murray, T. C. (2008). Distinguishing among perceived control, perceived difficulty, and self-efficacy as determinants of intentions and behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 607–630. · DOI
  45. Scholz, U., Schuz, B., Ziegelmann, J. P., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2008). Beyond behavioural intentions: Planning mediates between intentions and physical activity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 479–494. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Shaw, D. S., Hogg, G., Wilson, E., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L. (2006). Fashion victim: The impact of fair trade concerns on clothing choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14, 423–436.
  47. Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002a). An assessment of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer decision-making: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26, 286–293. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002b). The role of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26, 109–116. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2003). Ethics in consumer choice: A multivariate modelling approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1485–1498. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Shaw, D. S., Shiu, E., & Clarke, I. (2000). The contribution of ethical obligation and self-identity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 879–894. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sheeran, P., Milne, S., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). Implementation intentions and health behavior. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behavior (2nd ed., pp. 276–323). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  52. Sheeran, P., Traimow, D., & Armitage, C. J. (2003). Predicting behaviour from perceived behavioural control: Tests of the accuracy assumption of the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 393–410. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 199–214. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Strong, C. (1996). Features contributing to the growth of ethical consumerism—A preliminary investigation. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14, 5–13. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317–1338. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Tomolillo, D. A. C., & Shaw, D. (2004). Undressing the ethical issues in fashion: A consumer perspective. In C. Moore, M. Bruce, & G. Birtwistle (Eds.), Cases in International Retail Marketing (pp. 141–152). Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
  57. Van Osch, L., Reubsaet, A., Lechner, L., Beenackers, M., Candel, M., & De Vries, H. (2010). Planning health behaviour change: Comparing the behavioural influence of two types of self-regulatory planning. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 133–149. · DOI
  58. White, K. M., & Hyde, M. K. (2012). The role of self-perceptions in the prediction of household recycling behavior in Australia. Environment and Behavior, 44, 785–799. · DOI
  59. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78. · DOI · Paper page
  60. Wiedemann, A. U., Schüz, B., Sniehotta, F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2009). Disentangling the relation between intentions, planning, and behaviour: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychology & Health, 24, 67–79. · DOI

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
219-236
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0
OpenAlex
W2029353330
Cited by
455
References
12
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0
The paper
Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2016). Who Says There is an Intention–Behaviour Gap? Assessing the Empirical Evidence of an Intention–Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.