Cited by 241Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and Coping

Impostor feelings as a moderator and mediator of the relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health among racial/ethnic minority college students.

Open access
Cokley, Kevin, Smith, Leann, Bernard, Donte, Hurst, Ashley, Jackson, Stacey, Stone, Steven, Awosogba, Olufunke, Saucer, Chastity +2 more·2017·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated whether impostor feelings would both moderate and mediate the relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health in a sample of diverse ethnic minority college students (106 African Americans, 102 Asian Americans, 108 Latino/a Americans) at an urban public university. African American students reported higher perceived discrimination than Asian American and Latino/a American students, while no racial/ethnic group differences were reported for impostor feelings. Analyses revealed that among African American students, high levels of impostor feelings moderated the perceived discrimination and depression relationship and mediated the perceived discrimination and anxiety relationship. Among Asian American students, impostor feelings mediated the relationship between perceived discrimination and both depression and anxiety. Among Latino/a American students low levels of impostor feelings moderated the relationship between perceived discrimination and both depression and anxiety, and partially mediated the relationship between perceived discrimination and anxiety. Multigroup path analyses revealed a significantly stronger impact of impostor feelings on depression among African American students and a stronger impact of perceived discrimination on impostor feelings among African American and Latino/a American students. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000198

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cokley, K., Smith, L., Bernard, D., Hurst, A., Jackson, S., Stone, S., Awosogba, O., Saucer, C., Bailey, M., & Roberts, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2017-03
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
141-154
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2593856678
Cited by
241
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
34.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
perceived discrimination, mental health, depression, anxiety, African American students, Asian American students, moderation, mediation, ethnic minority students
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Culture, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Self Concept, Social Perception, Students, Southwestern United States, Young Adult, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review