Cited by 281Food composition and propertiesNutritional Studies and DietGut microbiota and health

Dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose–response analysis of prospective studies

Yao, Baodong, Fang, Hong, Xu, Wanghong, Yan, Yujie, Xu, Huilin, Liu, Yinan, Mo, Miao, Zhang, Hua +1 more·2014·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Observational studies suggest an association between dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes, but the results are inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating the associations of dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes. Relevant studies were identified by searching EMBASE (from 1974 to April 2013) and PubMed (from 1966 to April 2013). The fixed or random-effect model was selected based on the homogeneity test among studies. In addition, a 2-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analysis was performed. We identified 17 prospective cohort studies of dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes involving 19,033 cases and 488,293 participants. The combined RR (95 % CI) of type 2 diabetes for intake of total dietary fiber, cereal fiber, fruit fiber and insoluble fiber was 0.81 (0.73-0.90), 0.77 (0.69-0.85), 0.94 (0.88-0.99) and 0.75 (0.63-0.89), respectively. A nonlinear relationship was found of total dietary fiber intake with risk of type 2 diabetes (P for nonlinearity < 0.01), and the RRs (95 % CI) of type 2 diabetes were 0.98 (0.90-1.06), 0.97 (0.87-1.07), 0.89 (0.80-0.99), 0.76 (0.65-0.88), and 0.66 (0.53-0.82) for 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 g/day. The departure from nonlinear relationship was not significant (P for nonlinearity = 0.72), and the risk of type 2 diabetes decreased by 6 % (RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.93-0.96) for 2 g/day increment in cereal fiber intake. Findings from this meta-analysis indicate that the intakes of dietary fiber may be inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-013-9876-x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, B., Fang, H., Xu, W., Yan, Y., Xu, H., Liu, Y., Mo, M., Zhang, H., & Zhao, Y.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yanping
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2014-01-05
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
79-88
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2083323956
Cited by
281
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
FWCI
20.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
dietary fiber, type 2 diabetes, cereal fiber, fruit fiber, insoluble dietary fiber, dose-response relationship, nonlinear relationship, diabetes risk, prospective cohort
MeSH terms
Edible Grain, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Vegetables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review