Cited by 282Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and Perception

Cognitive mechanisms, specificity and neural underpinnings of visuospatial peaks in autism

Caron, M.-J.·2006·Brain

Abstract

In order to explain the cognitive and cerebral mechanisms responsible for the visuospatial peak in autism, and to document its specificity to this condition, a group of eight high-functioning individuals with autism and a visuospatial peak (HFA-P) performed a modified block-design task (BDT; subtest from Wechsler scales) at various levels of perceptual cohesiveness, as well as tasks tapping visuomotor speed, global perception, visual memory, visual search and speed of visual encoding. Their performance was compared with that of 8 autistics without a visuospatial peak (HFA-NP), 10 typically developing individuals (TD) and 8 gifted comparison participants with a visuospatial peak (TD-P). Both HFA-P and HFA-NP groups presented with diminished detrimental influence of increasing perceptual coherence compared with their BDT-matched comparison groups. Neither autistic group displayed a deficit in construction of global representations. The HFA-P group showed no differences in performance level or profile in comparison with the gifted BDT-matched [i.e. higher full-scale IQ (FSIQ)] group, apart from locally oriented perception. Diminished detrimental influence of perceptual coherence on BDT performance is both sensitive and specific to autism, and superior low-level processing interacts with locally oriented bias to produce outstanding BDT performance in a subgroup of autistic individuals. Locally oriented processing, enhanced performance in multiple tasks relying on detection of simple visual material and enhanced discrimination of first-order gratings converge towards an enhanced functioning and role of the primary visual cortex (V1) in autism. In contrast, superior or typical performance of autistics in tasks requiring global processing is inconsistent with the global-deficit-driven Weak Central Coherence hypothesis and its neurobiological magnocellular deficit counterpart.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awl072

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caron et al. (2006) found that in their geographically localized sample, 47% of the ASD-diagnosed population showed a Block Design Peak, as compared with 2% of the typical population.

    “In their geographically localized sample, 47% of the ASD-diagnosed population showed this peak, as compared with 2% of the typical population.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Caron et al. (2006)

  • Caron et al. (2006) found reaction times for both featural and conjunction search were faster for individuals with Block Design peaks, irrespective of diagnosis, than for those without.

    “They found that reaction times for both featural and conjunction search, were faster for the individuals with Block Design peaks, irrespective of diagnosis, than they were for those without.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Caron et al. (2006)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caron, M.-J.
Affiliations
Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies (CA)
Corresponding author
Caron, M.-J.
Venue
Brain
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
129
Issue
7
Pages
1789-1802
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2097072002
Cited by
282
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, local processing bias, global processing, primary visual cortex, weak central coherence, visual memory, visual search, visuomotor speed, gifted individuals
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Intelligence, Memory, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Sensitivity and Specificity, Space Perception, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review