Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humans and urban development mediate the sympatry of competing carnivores

Moll, Remington J., Cepek, Jonathon D., Lorch, Patrick D., Dennis, Patricia M., Robison, Terry, Millspaugh, Joshua J., Montgomery, Robert A.·2018·Urban Ecosystems
DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0758-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11252-018-0758-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Adkins CA, Stott P (1998) Home ranges, movements and habitat associations of red foxes Vulpes vulpes in suburban Toronto, Ontario, Canada. J Zool 244:335–346 · DOI
  2. Barbieri MM, Berger JO (2004) Optimal predictive model selection. Ann Stat 32:870–897 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N (2006) Interpreting short-term behavioral responses to disturbance within a longitudinal perspective. Anim Behav 72:1149–1158 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berger J (2007) Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biol Lett 3:620–623 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Burton AC, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, Bayne E, Boutin S (2015) Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J Appl Ecol 52:675–685 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Crooks KR, Riley SPD, Gehrt SD et al (2010) Community ecology of urban carnivores. In: Gehrt SD, Riley SPD, Cypher BL (eds) Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 185–200
  7. Darimont CT, Fox CH, Bryan HM, Reimchen TE (2015) The unique ecology of human predators. Science 80(349):858–861 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dorresteijn I, Schultner J, Nimmo DG, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Kuemmerle T, Kehoe L, Ritchie EG (2015) Incorporating anthropogenic effects into trophic ecology: predator–prey interactions in a human-dominated landscape. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20151602 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dröge E, Creel S, Becker MS, M’soka J (2017) Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1123–1128 · DOI
  10. Fischer JD, Cleeton SH, Lyons TP, Miller JR (2012) Urbanization and the predation paradox: the role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. Bioscience 62:809–818 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Forman RTT (2016) Urban ecology principles: are urban ecology and natural area ecology really different? Landsc Ecol 31:1653–1662 · DOI
  12. Frey S, Fisher JT, Burton AC, Volpe JP (2017) Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera-trap data: challenges and opportunities. Remote Sens. Ecol Conserv:1–10 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Ecol Soc 6:11
  14. Gallo T, Fidino M, Lehrer EW, Magle SB (2017) Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation. Ecol Appl 0:1–12
  15. Gehr B, Hofer EJ, Muff S et al (2017) A landscape of coexistence for a large predator in a human dominated landscape. Oikos:1–11 · DOI
  16. Gehrt SD, Anchor C, White LA (2009) Home range and landscape use of coyotes in a metropolitan landscape: conflict or coexistence? J Mammal 90:1045–1057 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gehrt SD, Brown JL, Anchor C (2011) Is the urban coyote a misantrhopic synanthrope? The case from Chicago. Cities Environ 4:3 · DOI
  18. Gehrt SD, Riley SPD (2010) Coyotes (Canis latrans). In: Gehrt SD, Riley SPD, Cypher BL (eds) Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 79–96 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York · DOI · Paper page
  20. Goad EH, Pejchar L, Reed SE, Knight RL (2014) Habitat use by mammals varies along an exurban development gradient in northern Colorado. Biol Conserv 176:172–182 · DOI
  21. Gompper ME (2002) Top carnivores in the suburbs? Ecological and conservation issues raised by colonization of northeastern North America by coyotes. Bioscience 52:185 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Gosselink TE, Van DTR, Warner RE, Joselyn MG (2003) Temporal habitat partitioning and spatial use of coyotes and red foxes in east-Central Illinois. J Wildl Manag 67:90–103 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Greene W (2008) Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Econ Lett 99:585–590 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Harrison DJ, Bissonette JA, Sherburne JA (1989) Spatial relationships between coyotes and red foxes in eastern Maine. J Wildl Manag 53:181–185 · DOI
  25. Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm AS 136: a K-means clustering algorithm. J R Stat Soc C 28:100–108
  26. Hooten MB, Hobbs ANT (2015) A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists. Ecol Monogr 85:3–28 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Karanth KU, Srivathsa A, Vasudev D, Puri M, Parameshwaran R, Kumar NS (2017) Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20161860 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kays R, Parsons AW, Baker MC et al (2016) Does hunting or hiking affect wildlife communities in protected areas? J Appl Ecol 54:242–252 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kays RW, Gompper ME, Ray JC (2008) Landscape ecology of eastern coyotes based on large-scale estimates of abundance. Ecol Appl 18:1014–1027 · DOI
  30. Kéry M, Royle JA (2015) Applied hierarchical modeling in ecology: analysis of distribution, abundance and species richness in R and BUGS / volume 1. Prelude and static models, Elsevier, San Diego, California
  31. Kuijper DPJ, Sahlén E, Elmhagen B, Chamaillé-Jammes S, Sand H, Lone K, Cromsigt JPGM (2016) Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20161625 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lashley MA, Cove MV, Chitwood MC et al (2018) Estimating wildlife activity curves: comparison of methods and sample size. Sci Rep:1–11 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM, Hellgren EC (2015) Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in Midwestern North America. Wildl Monogr 191:1–61 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Loveridge AJ, Valeix M, Elliot NB, Macdonald DW (2017) The landscape of anthropogenic mortality: how African lions respond to spatial variation in risk. J Appl Ecol 54:815–825 · DOI
  35. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB et al (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Magle SB, Hunt VM, Vernon M, Crooks KR (2012) Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol Conserv 155:23–32 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Mao JS, Boyce MS, Smith DW et al (2005) Habitat selection by elk before and after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. J Wildl Manag 69:1691–1707 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Marks CA, Bloomfield TE (2006) Home-range size and selection of natal den and diurnal shelter sites by urban red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Melbourne. Wildl Res 33:339–347 · DOI
  39. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Meredith M, Ridout M (2014) Overlap: Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns · DOI · Paper page
  41. Mielke PW, Berry KJ, Johnson ES (1976) Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Commun Stat - Theory Methods 5:1409–1424 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mitchell N, Strohbach MW, Pratt R, Finn WC, Strauss EG (2015) Space use by resident and transient coyotes in an urban-rural landscape mosaic. Wildl Res 42:461–469 · doi:10.1071/wr15020
  43. Moll RJ, Kilshaw K, Montgomery RA, Abade L, Campbell RD, Harrington LA, Millspaugh JJ, Birks JDS, Macdonald DW (2016) Clarifying habitat niche width using broad-scale, hierarchical occupancy models: a case study with a recovering mesocarnivore. J Zool 300:177–185 · DOI
  44. Moll RJ, Redilla KM, Mudumba T, Muneza AB, Gray SM, Abade L, Hayward MW, Millspaugh JJ, Montgomery RA (2017) The many faces of fear: a synthesis of methodological variation in characterizing predation risk. J Anim Ecol 86:749–765 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Monterroso P, Alves PC, Ferreras P (2013) Catch me if you can: diel activity patterns of mammalian prey and predators. Ethology 119:1044–1056 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Morey PS, Gense EM, Gehrt SD (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area. Am Midl Nat 158:147–161 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Mueller MA, Drake D, Allen ML (2018) Coexistence of coyotes (Canis latrans) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an urban landscape. 1–19 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Newey S, Davidson P, Nazir S, Fairhurst G, Verdicchio F, Irvine RJ, van der Wal R (2015) Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: a practitioner’s perspective. Ambio 44:624–635 · DOI
  49. Niedballa J, Sollmann R, Courtiol A, Wilting A (2016) camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1457–1462 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Nouvellet P, Rasmussen GSA, MacDonald DW, Courchamp F (2012) Noisy clocks and silent sunrises: measurement methods of daily activity pattern. J Zool 286:179–184 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Ordeñana MA, Crooks KR, Boydston EE, Fisher RN, Lyren LM, Siudyla S, Haas CD, Harris S, Hathaway SA, Turschak GM, Miles AK, van Vuren DH (2010) Effects of urbanization on carnivore species distribution and richness. J Mammal 91:1322–1331 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Oriol-Cotterill A, Valeix M, Frank LG, Riginos C, Macdonald DW (2015) Landscapes of coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans. Oikos 124:1263–1273 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Plummer M (2003) JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing. p 124:1–8
  54. Poessel SA, Breck S, Teel TL et al (2012) Patterns of human – coyote conflicts in the Denver metropolitan area. J Wildl Manag 77:297–305 · DOI
  55. Polis GA, Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol 7:151–154 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Randa LA, Yunger JA (2006) Carnivore occurrence along an urban-rural gradient: a landscape-level analysis. J Mammal 87:1154–1164 · DOI
  57. Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:322–337 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Royle JA, Dorazio RM (2008) Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, UK
  59. Šálek M, Drahníková L, Tkadlec E (2015) Changes in home range sizes and population densities of carnivore species along the natural to urban habitat gradient. Mamm Rev 45:1–15 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Sargeant AB, Allen SH (1989) Observed interactions between coyotes and red foxes. J Mammal 70:631–633 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Sargeant AB, Allen SH, Hastings JO (1987) Spatial relations between sympatric coyotes and red foxes in North Dakota. J Wildl Manag 51:285–293 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Schmitz OJ, Miller JRB, Trainor AM, Abrahms B (2017) Toward a community ecology of landscapes: predicting multiple predator-prey interactions across geographic space. Ecology 98:2281–2292 · DOI
  63. Smith JA, Suraci JP, Clinchy M, Crawford A, Roberts D, Zanette LY, Wilmers CC (2017) Fear of the human “super predator” reduces feeding time in large carnivores. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20170433 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Stevens DL, Olsen AR (2003) Variance estimation for spatially balanced samples of environmental resources. Environmetrics 14:593–610 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Theberge JB, Wedeles CHR (1989) Prey selection and habitat partitioning in sympatric coyote and red fox populations, Southwest Yukon. Can J Zool 67:1285–1290 · DOI
  66. Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv Biol 17:1491–1499 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Vanak AT, Fortin D, Thaker M, Ogden M, Owen C, Greatwood S, Slotow R (2013) Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. Ecology 94:2619–2631 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Wang Y, Allen ML, Wilmers CC (2015) Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. Biol Conserv 190:23–33 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Wapenaar W, de Bie F, Johnston D, et al (2012) Population structure of harvested red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and coyotes (Canis latrans) on Prince Edward Island, Canada. Can Field-Naturalist 126:288–294 · DOI
  70. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Wilmers CC, Wang Y, Nickel B, Houghtaling P, Shakeri Y, Allen ML, Kermish-Wells J, Yovovich V, Williams T (2013) Scale dependent behavioral responses to human development by a large predator, the puma. PLoS One 8:e60590 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
Moll, R. J., Cepek, J. D., Lorch, P. D., Dennis, P. M., Robison, T., Millspaugh, J. J., & Montgomery, R. A.
Venue
Urban Ecosystems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-04-17
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
765-778
ISSN
  • 1083-8155
  • 1573-1642
DOI
10.1007/s11252-018-0758-6
Cited by
122
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Humans and urban development mediate the sympatry of competing carnivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11252-018-0758-6
The paper
Moll, R. J., Cepek, J. D., Lorch, P. D., Dennis, P. M., Robison, T., Millspaugh, J. J., & Montgomery, R. A. (2018). Humans and urban development mediate the sympatry of competing carnivores. Urban Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0758-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.