Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Randomized trial of cognitive behaviour group therapy and a mindfulness-based intervention for social anxiety disorder: Preliminary findings

Koszycki, Diana, Guérin, Eva, DiMillo, Julia, Bradwejn, Jacques·2021·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Recent studies have evaluated the possible efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, few trials have compared MBIs with a first-line treatment. This study evaluated the relative efficacy of an MBI adapted for SAD (MBI-SAD) to cognitive behaviour group therapy (CBGT) for SAD. Participants were randomized to 12 weekly group sessions of the MBI-SAD (n = 52) or CBGT (n = 45). Results revealed that CBGT fared better than the MBI-SAD in reducing clinician- and self-rated social anxiety severity. The difference between the MBI-SAD and CBGT exceeded the prespecified noninferiority margin for our primary outcome the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, but findings are inconclusive as the width of the confidence interval extended in both directions surrounding the noninferiority margin. The MBI-SAD compared favourably with CBGT in improving other indices of well-being (depression, self-esteem, satisfaction with life, social adjustment). Contrary to expectation, the MBI-SAD did not produce greater changes in mindfulness and self-compassion than CBGT. Overall, results confirm that CBGT is robust treatment for SAD and should be considered as first-line treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2502

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koszycki, D., Guérin, E., DiMillo, J., & Bradwejn, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Montfort Hospital (CA)
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-25
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
200-218
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W3080300125
Cited by
24
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ontario Mental Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, mindfulness-based interventions, non-inferiority, first-line therapy, treatment efficacy comparison, self-compassion, mindfulness, depression, self-esteem, life satisfaction, social adaptation
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review