The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048153 · Cited by 1,700
Elements of a theory of human problem solving.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048495 · Cited by 1,380
Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.
Anderson, N. H. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0029064 · Cited by 576
S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.
Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054967 · Cited by 469
Cue-Consistency and Cue-Utilization in Judgment
Slovic, P. (1966) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420883 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Cited by
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Self-citation“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Bolton, R. N. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.45 · Cited by 1,948
Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413 · Cited by 1,691
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 · Cited by 1,550
A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076477 · Cited by 1,486
Task complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393
Confidence in judgment: persistence of the illusion of validity
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.395 · Cited by 1,209
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011
Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing.
Arkes, H. R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486 · Cited by 764
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758
On Product Uncertainty in Online Markets: Theory and Evidence1
Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703461 · Cited by 682
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6 · Cited by 673
Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003214 · Cited by 652
Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques
Cooke, N. J. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083 · Cited by 579
The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959 · Cited by 545
Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction
Ajzen, I. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.303 · Cited by 503
A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions
DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90029-1 · Cited by 444
Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208839120 · Cited by 342
The Roles of Perceived Inhibitors and Facilitators in Pleasure Travel Destination Decisions
Um, S., & Crompton, J. L. (1992) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/004728759203000303 · Cited by 289
Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristic
Price, P. C., & Stone, E. R. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.460 · Cited by 272
Process Tracing Methods in Decision Support Systems Research: Exploring the Black Box
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248979 · Cited by 224
Mental Contamination and the Debiasing Problem
Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., & Brekke, N. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.012 · Cited by 160
The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.041 · Cited by 146
Can Jurors Understand Probabilistic Evidence?
Kaye, D. H., & Koehler, J. J. (1991) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982696 · Cited by 101
Equity Theory and Time: A Reformulation
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1983) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1983.4284741 · Cited by 93
A theory of learning to infer.
Dasgupta, I., Schulz, E., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000178 · Cited by 70
Zloteanu, M., Harvey, N., Tuckett, D., & Livan, G. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209071 · Cited by 56
A policy-capturing study of the contextual antecedents of test anxiety
Reeve, C. L., Bonaccio, S., & Charles, J. E. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.006 · Cited by 27
(2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u4ptb · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 649-744
- ISSN
- 0030-5073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079199322
- Cited by
- 1,819
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 25.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
