Cited by 419Fungal and yeast genetics researchMitochondrial Function and PathologyAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

RTG1 and RTG2: two yeast genes required for a novel path of communication from mitochondria to the nucleus

Liao, Xinsheng, Butow, Ronald A.·1993·Cell

Abstract

The expression of some nuclear genes is sensitive to the functional state of mitochondria, a process we term retrograde regulation. Here we show that retrograde regulation of the yeast CIT2 gene encoding peroxisomal citrate synthase depends on a new class of upstream activation site element (UASr) and two previously unidentified genes, RTG1 and RTG2. RTG1 encodes a protein of 177 amino acids with similarity to basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that likely functions at the CIT2 UASr. RTG2 encodes a protein of 394 amino acids of unknown function. Cells containing null alleles of RTG1 and RTG2 are viable and respiratory competent. However, they are auxotrophic for glutamic or aspartic acid and cannot use acetate as a sole carbon source, suggesting that both the tricarboxylic acid and glyoxylate cycles are compromised. Thus, RTG1 and RTG2 are pivotal genes in controlling interorganelle communication between mitochondria, peroxisomes, and the nucleus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90050-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, X., & Butow, R. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
61-71
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128525259
Cited by
419
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM22525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
retrograde regulation, bHLH transcription factors, mitochondrial-nuclear communication, peroxisomes, TCA cycle, glyoxylate cycle, auxotrophy, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Cell Nucleus, Citrate (si)-Synthase, Cloning, Molecular, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Fungal, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Fungal, Genes, Regulator, Glycerol, Microbodies, Mitochondria, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review