Cited by 543Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

REM sleep selectively prunes and maintains new synapses in development and learning

Open access
Li, Wei, Ma, Lei, Yang, Guang, Gan, Wen-Biao·2017·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The functions and underlying mechanisms of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep remain unclear. Here we show that REM sleep prunes newly formed postsynaptic dendritic spines of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the mouse motor cortex during development and motor learning. This REM sleep-dependent elimination of new spines facilitates subsequent spine formation during development and when a new motor task is learned, indicating a role for REM sleep in pruning to balance the number of new spines formed over time. Moreover, REM sleep also strengthens and maintains newly formed spines, which are critical for neuronal circuit development and behavioral improvement after learning. We further show that dendritic calcium spikes arising during REM sleep are important for pruning and strengthening new spines. Together, these findings indicate that REM sleep has multifaceted functions in brain development, learning and memory consolidation by selectively eliminating and maintaining newly formed synapses via dendritic calcium spike-dependent mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4479

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory processing and consolidation in the developing brain might be organized in a more parallel manner at the hippocampal and neocortical level, which, with generally increased plasticity especially during REM sleep, might produce stronger transformations at the neocortical level.

    “Instead, memory processing and consolidation in the developing brain might be organized in a more parallel manner at the hippocampal and neocortical level which, in conjunction with a generally increased plasticity especially during REM sleep 231,249 might produce stronger transformations at the neocortical level.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [231]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • REM sleep probably particularly contributes to the regulation of synaptic plasticity during development.

    “with the latter probably particularly contributing to the regulation of synaptic plasticity during development.231,249”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [231]

  • REM sleep is characterized by enhanced synaptic pruning that selectively omitted subsets of synapses formed during encoding of new motor memory prior to sleep.

    “By contrast, REM sleep was found to be characterized by enhanced synaptic pruning that selectively omitted subsets of synapses formed during encoding of new motor memory prior to sleep.231”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [231]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Ma, L., Yang, G., & Gan, W.-B.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Gan, Wen-Biao
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2017-01-16
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
427-437
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2579604288
Cited by
543
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 1
FWCI
30.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG048410)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH111486)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM107469)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS047325)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
REM sleep, synaptic pruning, dendritic spines, dendritic calcium spikes, motor cortex, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, motor learning, brain development, memory consolidation, synaptogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Female, Learning, Locomotion, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Cortex, Neuronal Plasticity, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Synapses, Pyramidal Cells, Rotarod Performance Test, Dendritic Spines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review