CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,396Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How emotions affect eating: A five-way model

Macht, Michael·2008·Appetite
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite the importance of affective processes in eating behaviour, it remains difficult to predict how emotions affect eating. Emphasizing individual differences, previous research did not pay full attention to the twofold variability of emotion-induced changes of eating (variability across both individuals and emotions). By contrast, the present paper takes into account both individual characteristics and emotion features, and specifies five classes of emotion-induced changes of eating: (1) emotional control of food choice, (2) emotional suppression of food intake, (3) impairment of cognitive eating controls, (4) eating to regulate emotions, and (5) emotion-congruent modulation of eating. These classes are distinguished by antecedent conditions, eating responses and mediating mechanisms. They point to basic functional principles underlying the relations between emotions and biologically based motives: interference, concomitance and regulation. Thus, emotion-induced changes of eating can be a result of interference of eating by emotions, a by-product of emotions, and a consequence of regulatory processes (i.e., emotions may regulate eating, and eating may regulate emotions).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 156 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Krumbacher, 1963, Das Appetitverhalten des gesunden unter emotionalem Streß, Psychosomatische Medizin, 9, 89
  2. Pudel, V. (1984). Psychosoziale Bewertung der Ernährung in Familien mit Kindern. Eine Repräsentativerhebung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (Ed.), Ernährungsbericht (pp. 103–144). Frankfurt am Main: Henrich.
  3. Tuschen, 1993, Beeinflußt die Stimmung den Appetit?, Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 22, 315

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Macht, M.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Macht, Michael
ORCID
Macht, Michael
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.002
OpenAlex
W2007130974
Cited by
1,396
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 40
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
eating behaviour, food choice, emotion regulation, emotional suppression, cognitive control, individual differences, emotion features
MeSH terms
Appetite Regulation, Eating, Emotions, Food, Food Preferences, Humans, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review