Cited by 57Fatty Acid Research and HealthMemory and Neural MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Chronic administration of DHA and UMP improves the impaired memory of environmentally impoverished rats

Open access
Holguin, Sarah, Huang, Yi, Liu, Jenny, Wurtman, Richard·2008·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Living in an enriched environment (EC) during development enhances memory function in adulthood; living in an impoverished environment (IC) impairs memory function. Compounds previously demonstrated to improve memory among IC rats include CDP-choline and uridine monophosphate (UMP). Brain phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis utilizes both the uridine formed from the metabolism of exogenous CDP-choline and UMP, and the choline formed from that of CDP-choline. It also uses the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) DHA, a precursor for the diacylglycerol incorporated into PC. DHA administration also improves cognition in young and aged rodents and humans; its effects on cognitively impaired IC rats have not been characterized. We have thus examined the consequences of administering DHA (300 mg/kg) by gavage, UMP (0.5% in the diet), or both compounds on hippocampal- and striatal-dependent forms of memory among rats exposed to EC or IC conditions for 1 month starting at weaning, and consuming a choline-containing diet. We observe that giving IC rats either dietary UMP or gavaged DHA improves performance on the hidden version of the Morris water maze (all P<0.05), a hippocampal-dependent task; co-administration of both phosphatide precursors further enhances the IC rats' performance on this task (P<0.001). Neither UMP nor DHA, nor giving both compounds, affects the performance of EC rats on the hidden version of the Morris water maze (P>0.05), nor the performance by IC or EC rats on the visible version of the Morris water maze (all P>0.05), a striatal-dependent task. We confirm that co-administration of UMP and DHA to rats increases brain levels of the phosphatides PC, PE, SM, PS, PI, and total brain phospholipid levels (all P<0.05), and show that rearing animals in an enriched environment also elevates brain PC, PS, and PI levels (all P<0.01) and total brain phospholipids (P<0.01) compared with their levels in animals reared in an IC environment. These findings suggest that giving DHA plus UMP can ameliorate memory deficits associated with rearing under impoverished conditions, and that this effect may be mediated in part through enhanced synthesis of brain membrane phosphatides.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.042

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-administration of uridine, docosahexaenoic acid, and choline can increase the amount of phospholipids, synaptic proteins, dendritic spine density and neurite outgrowth in rodents.

    “Several studies in rodents showed that co-administration of uridine, DHA, and choline can increase the amount of phospholipids, synaptic proteins, dendritic spine density and neurite outgrowth (Holguin et al., 2008;Sakamoto et al., 2007;Wurtman et al., 2006).”

    From The Gut-Brain Axis in Parkinson’s Disease: Possibilities for Food-Based Therapies (2017) · cites this paper as Holguin et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holguin, S., Huang, Y., Liu, J., & Wurtman, R.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wurtman, Richard
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
191
Issue
1
Pages
11-16
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003682910
Cited by
57
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH028783, MH 28783, R01MH028783)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, uridine monophosphate, environmental enrichment, impoverished environment, memory impairment, hippocampal-dependent memory, phosphatidylcholine synthesis, brain phospholipids, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingomyelin, choline, cognitive enhancement, developmental environment
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Environment, Male, Memory Disorders, Phospholipids, Uridine Monophosphate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rotarod Performance Test, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review