Cited by 47Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyStress Responses and Cortisol

Oxytocin modulates unconditioned fear response in lactating dams: An fMRI study

Open access
Febo, Marcelo, Shields, Jessica, Ferris, Craig F., King, Jean A.·2009·Brain Research

Abstract

Oxytocinergic neurotransmission during lactation contributes to reduction of anxiety levels and fear. However, our knowledge of where oxytocin acts in the brain to achieve this effect, particularly to an unconditioned fear stimulus, is incomplete. We used blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fMRI to test whether central administration of oxytocin 45-60 min before fMRI scanning alters maternal brain activation in response to a predator scent (TMT, trimethylthiazoline). Comparison behavioral experiments that examined maternal responses to this unconditioned fear-inducing odor were carried out in a separate cohort of lactating rats given similar treatments. Behavioral experiments confirmed the effectiveness of oxytocin at reducing freezing behavior as compared to vehicle controls. Our fMRI findings indicate that oxytocin modulated both positive and negative BOLD responses across several olfactory and forebrain nuclei. Significantly greater percent increases in BOLD signal in response to TMT were observed in the anterior cingulate, bed nucleus of stria terminalis and perirhinal area of oxytocin pretreated rats. These animals also showed significantly larger percent decreases in BOLD in mammillary bodies, secondary motor cortex, gustatory cortex, prelimbic prefrontal cortex, orbital cortex, and the anterior olfactory nucleus. The observed pattern of brain activity suggests that oxytocin enhances neural processing in emotion and cognition driven brain areas such as the cingulate cortex, while dramatically reducing activity in areas also controlling autonomic, visceromotor and skeletomotor responses. The present data contribute to the growing literature suggesting the oxytocin modulate the integration of emotional and cognitive information through myriad brain regions to facilitate decreases in anxiety (even to an unconditioned stimulus) while potentially promoting pair-bonding, social memory and parental care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.043

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exogenous OT administration decreases fear behaviours of lactating rats, at the same time as increasing brain activity in emotion and cognition regulation regions, such as the anterior cingulate, and decreasing brain activity in autonomic, visceromotor and skeletomotor areas.

    “Furthermore, exogenous OT administration decreases fear behaviours of lactating rats, at the same time as increasing brain activity in emotion and cognition regulation regions, such as the anterior cingulate, and decreasing brain activity in autonomic, visceromotor and skeletomotor areas enhances neural processing in (and also modulates) emotion regulation brain circuits (28).”

    From Neuroendocrinology of Parental Response to Baby‐Cry (2011) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Febo, M., Shields, J., Ferris, C. F., & King, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
King, Jean A.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
1302
Pages
183-193
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044350295
Cited by
47
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (MH067096)
  • NIDA (DA019946, DA13517)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
oxytocin, lactation, maternal behavior, anxiety reduction, predator scent, olfactory processing, anterior cingulate cortex, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, perirhinal cortex, anterior olfactory nucleus, freezing behavior, parental care
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Autonomic Nervous System, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Emotions, Fear, Lactation, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Odorants, Olfactory Pathways, Oxytocin, Predatory Behavior, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Smell, Social Behavior, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review