Cited by 1,808Circular RNAs in diseasesRNA Research and SplicingCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Circular RNA: a new star of noncoding RNAs

Qu, Shibin, Yang, Xisheng, Li, Xiaolei, Wang, Jianlin, Gao, Yuan, Shang, Runze, Sun, Wei, Dou, Kefeng +1 more·2015·Cancer Letters

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel type of RNA that, unlike linear RNAs, form a covalently closed continuous loop and are highly represented in the eukaryotic transcriptome. Recent studies have discovered thousands of endogenous circRNAs in mammalian cells. CircRNAs are largely generated from exonic or intronic sequences, and reverse complementary sequences or RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are necessary for circRNA biogenesis. The majority of circRNAs are conserved across species, are stable and resistant to RNase R, and often exhibit tissue/developmental-stage-specific expression. Recent research has revealed that circRNAs can function as microRNA (miRNA) sponges, regulators of splicing and transcription, and modifiers of parental gene expression. Emerging evidence indicates that circRNAs might play important roles in atherosclerotic vascular disease risk, neurological disorders, prion diseases and cancer; exhibit aberrant expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); and serve as diagnostic or predictive biomarkers of some diseases. Similar to miRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), circRNAs are becoming a new research hotspot in the field of RNA and could be widely involved in the processes of life. Herein, we review the formation and properties of circRNAs, their functions, and their potential significance in disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qu, S., Yang, X., Li, X., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Shang, R., Sun, W., Dou, K., & Li, H.
Affiliations
Xijing Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Haimin
Venue
Cancer Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
365
Issue
2
Pages
141-148
ISSN
0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1866220599
Cited by
1,808
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 236 · 2021: 328 · 2020: 326 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772061)
  • Health Public Welfare Industry Special Scientific Research Projects of China (201202007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Circular RNAs in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
circular RNA, circRNA biogenesis, RNA-binding proteins, microRNA sponge, RNA splicing regulation, transcriptional regulation, circRNA stability, disease biomarkers, colorectal cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, atherosclerosis, neurological disorders, prion disease, long non-coding RNA
MeSH terms
RNA, Circular, Exoribonucleases, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Neoplasms, RNA, RNA Splicing, Transcription, Genetic, RNA, Untranslated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review