Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cryo-EM Structure of the Human FLCN-FNIP2-Rag-Ragulator Complex

Shen, Kuang, Rogala, Kacper B., Chou, Hui-Ting, Huang, Rick K., Yu, Zhiheng, Sabatini, David M.·2019·Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.036

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Adams, 2010, PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 213, 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anandapadamanaban, 2019, Architecture of human Rag GTPase heterodimers and their complex with mTORC1, Science, 366, 203, 10.1126/science.aax3939 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baba, 2006, Folliculin encoded by the BHD gene interacts with a binding protein, FNIP1, and AMPK, and is involved in AMPK and mTOR signaling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 15552, 10.1073/pnas.0603781103 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baretić, 2016, Tor forms a dimer through an N-terminal helical solenoid with a complex topology, Nat. Commun., 7, 11016, 10.1038/ncomms11016 · DOI
  5. Birt, 1977, Hereditary multiple fibrofolliculomas with trichodiscomas and acrochordons, Arch. Dermatol., 113, 1674, 10.1001/archderm.1977.01640120042005 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, 2018, Cryo-EM structure of human mTOR complex 2, Cell Res., 28, 518, 10.1038/s41422-018-0029-3 · DOI
  7. Daumke, 2004, The GTPase-activating protein Rap1GAP uses a catalytic asparagine, Nature, 429, 197, 10.1038/nature02505 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Drozdetskiy, 2015, JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, W389, 10.1093/nar/gkv332 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Emsley, 2010, Features and development of Coot, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gong, 2011, Crystal structure of the Gtr1p-Gtr2p complex reveals new insights into the amino acid-induced TORC1 activation, Genes Dev., 25, 1668, 10.1101/gad.16968011 · DOI · Paper page
  11. González, 2017, Nutrient sensing and TOR signaling in yeast and mammals, EMBO J., 36, 397, 10.15252/embj.201696010 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Grant, 2018, cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing, eLife, 7, e35383, 10.7554/eLife.35383 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hasumi, 2008, Identification and characterization of a novel folliculin-interacting protein FNIP2, Gene, 415, 60, 10.1016/j.gene.2008.02.022 · DOI
  14. Hasumi, 2015, Folliculin-interacting proteins Fnip1 and Fnip2 play critical roles in kidney tumor suppression in cooperation with Flcn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, E1624, 10.1073/pnas.1419502112 · DOI
  15. Kim, 2019, mTOR as a central hub of nutrient signalling and cell growth, Nat. Cell Biol., 21, 63, 10.1038/s41556-018-0205-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Li, 2004, Biochemical and functional characterizations of small GTPase Rheb and TSC2 GAP activity, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 7965, 10.1128/MCB.24.18.7965-7975.2004 · DOI
  17. Liebschner, 2019, Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix, Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol., 75, 861, 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Mastronarde, 2005, Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements, J. Struct. Biol., 152, 36, 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Mathieu, 2019, Folliculin regulates mTORC1/2 and WNT pathways in early human pluripotency, Nat. Commun., 10, 632, 10.1038/s41467-018-08020-0 · DOI
  20. Menon, 2014, Spatial control of the TSC complex integrates insulin and nutrient regulation of mTORC1 at the lysosome, Cell, 156, 771, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mishra, 2016, Invited review: Small GTPases and their GAPs, Biopolymers, 105, 431, 10.1002/bip.22833 · DOI
  22. Mu, 2017, Structural insight into the Ragulator complex which anchors mTORC1 to the lysosomal membrane, Cell Discov., 3, 17049, 10.1038/celldisc.2017.49 · DOI
  23. Nakashima, 1996, Putative GTPase Gtr1p genetically interacts with the RanGTPase cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Cell Sci., 109, 2311, 10.1242/jcs.109.9.2311 · DOI
  24. Nakashima, 1999, Saccharomyces cerevisiae putative G protein, Gtr1p, which forms complexes with itself and a novel protein designated as Gtr2p, negatively regulates the Ran/Gsp1p G protein cycle through Gtr2p, Genetics, 152, 853, 10.1093/genetics/152.3.853 · DOI
  25. Pacitto, 2015, Lst4, the yeast Fnip1/2 orthologue, is a DENN-family protein, Open Biol., 5, 150174, 10.1098/rsob.150174 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pan, 2006, TBC-domain GAPs for Rab GTPases accelerate GTP hydrolysis by a dual-finger mechanism, Nature, 442, 303, 10.1038/nature04847 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Panchaud, 2013, Amino acid deprivation inhibits TORC1 through a GTPase-activating protein complex for the Rag family GTPase Gtr1, Sci. Signal., 6, ra42, 10.1126/scisignal.2004112 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Péli-Gulli, 2015, Amino Acids Stimulate TORC1 through Lst4-Lst7, a GTPase-Activating Protein Complex for the Rag Family GTPase Gtr2, Cell Rep., 13, 1, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.059 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Punjani, 2017, cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination, Nat. Methods, 14, 290, 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Rogala, 2019, Structural basis for the docking of mTORC1 on the lysosomal surface, Science, 366, 468, 10.1126/science.aay0166 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Roy, 2010, I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction, Nat. Protoc., 5, 725, 10.1038/nprot.2010.5 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Saucedo, 2003, Rheb promotes cell growth as a component of the insulin/TOR signalling network, Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 566, 10.1038/ncb996 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Scalvenzi, 1998, Hereditary multiple fibrofolliculomas, trichodiscomas and acrochordons: syndrome of Birt-Hogg-Dubè, J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol., 11, 45
  34. Schmidt, 2018, FLCN: The causative gene for Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, Gene, 640, 28, 10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.044 · DOI
  35. Schürmann, 1995, Cloning of a novel family of mammalian GTP-binding proteins (RagA, RagBs, RagB1) with remote similarity to the Ras-related GTPases, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 28982, 10.1074/jbc.270.48.28982 · DOI
  36. Seewald, 2002, RanGAP mediates GTP hydrolysis without an arginine finger, Nature, 415, 662, 10.1038/415662a · DOI
  37. Shen, 2018, Ragulator and SLC38A9 activate the Rag GTPases through noncanonical GEF mechanisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 9545, 10.1073/pnas.1811727115 · DOI
  38. Shen, 2017, Intersubunit Crosstalk in the Rag GTPase Heterodimer Enables mTORC1 to Respond Rapidly to Amino Acid Availability, Mol. Cell, 68, 552, 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shen, 2019, Arg-78 of Nprl2 catalyzes GATOR1-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by the Rag GTPases, J. Biol. Chem., 294, 2970, 10.1074/jbc.AC119.007382 · DOI
  40. Stuttfeld, 2018, Architecture of the human mTORC2 core complex, eLife, 7, e33101, 10.7554/eLife.33101 · DOI
  41. Su, 2017, Hybrid Structure of the RagA/C-Ragulator mTORC1 Activation Complex, Mol. Cell, 68, 835, 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.016 · DOI
  42. Takagi, 2008, Interaction of folliculin (Birt-Hogg-Dubé gene product) with a novel Fnip1-like (FnipL/Fnip2) protein, Oncogene, 27, 5339, 10.1038/onc.2008.261 · DOI
  43. Valvezan, 2019, Molecular logic of mTORC1 signalling as a metabolic rheostat, Nature Metabolism, 1, 321, 10.1038/s42255-019-0038-7 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Wagner, 2019, SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM, Commun Biol, 2, 218, 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z · DOI · Paper page
  45. Yang, 2016, 4.4 Å Resolution Cryo-EM structure of human mTOR Complex 1, Protein Cell, 7, 878, 10.1007/s13238-016-0346-6 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Yip, 2010, Structure of the human mTOR complex I and its implications for rapamycin inhibition, Mol. Cell, 38, 768, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Young, 2016, AMPK governs lineage specification through Tfeb-dependent regulation of lysosomes, Genes Dev., 30, 535, 10.1101/gad.274142.115 · DOI
  48. Zhang, 2016, Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction, J. Struct. Biol., 193, 1, 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Zhang, 2017, Structural basis for Ragulator functioning as a scaffold in membrane-anchoring of Rag GTPases and mTORC1, Nat. Commun., 8, 1394, 10.1038/s41467-017-01567-4 · DOI
  50. Zheng, 2017, MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy, Nat. Methods, 14, 331, 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Zivanov, 2018, New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3, eLife, 7, e42166, 10.7554/eLife.42166 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Zivanov, 2019, A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis, IUCrJ, 6, 5, 10.1107/S205225251801463X · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shen, K., Rogala, K. B., Chou, H.-T., Huang, R. K., Yu, Z., & Sabatini, D. M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
179
Issue
6
Pages
1319-1329.e8
ISSN
0092-8674
DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.036
Cited by
134
References
20
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1-0230)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Cancer Society
  • Lustgarten Foundation
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 CA103866, R01 CA129105, R37 AI047389)
  • Tuberous Sclerosis Association

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.