Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 913

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic Correlates of Immune-Cell Infiltrates in Colorectal Carcinoma

Open access
Giannakis, Marios, Mu, Xinmeng Jasmine, Shukla, Sachet A., Qian, Zhi Rong, Cohen, Ofir, Nishihara, Reiko, Bahl, Samira, Cao, Yin, Amin-Mansour, Ali, Yamauchi, Mai, Sukawa, Yasutaka, Stewart, Chip, Rosenberg, Mara, Mima, Kosuke, Inamura, Kentaro, Nosho, Katsuhiko, Nowak, Jonathan A., Lawrence, Michael S., Giovannucci, Edward L., Chan, Andrew T., Ng, Kimmie, Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A., Van Allen, Eliezer M., Getz, Gad, Gabriel, Stacey B., Lander, Eric S., Wu, Catherine J., Fuchs, Charles S., Ogino, Shuji, Garraway, Levi A.·2016·Cell Reports

Abstract

Large-scale genomic characterization of tumors from prospective cohort studies may yield new insights into cancer pathogenesis. We performed whole-exome sequencing of 619 incident colorectal cancers (CRCs) and integrated the results with tumor immunity, pathology, and survival data. We identified recurrently mutated genes in CRC, such as BCL9L, RBM10, CTCF, and KLF5, that were not previously appreciated in this disease. Furthermore, we investigated the genomic correlates of immune-cell infiltration and found that higher neoantigen load was positively associated with overall lymphocytic infiltration, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), memory T cells, and CRC-specific survival. The association with TILs was evident even within microsatellite-stable tumors. We also found positive selection of mutations in HLA genes and other components of the antigen-processing machinery in TIL-rich tumors. These results may inform immunotherapeutic approaches in CRC. More generally, this study demonstrates a framework for future integrative molecular epidemiology research in colorectal and other malignancies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.075

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Giannakis, M., Mu, X. J., Shukla, S. A., Qian, Z. R., Cohen, O., Nishihara, R., Bahl, S., Cao, Y., Amin-Mansour, A., Yamauchi, M., Sukawa, Y., Stewart, C., Rosenberg, M., Mima, K., Inamura, K., Nosho, K., Nowak, J. A., Lawrence, M. S., Giovannucci, E. L., Chan, A. T., Ng, K., Meyerhardt, J. A., Van Allen, E. M., Getz, G., Gabriel, S. B., Lander, E. S., Wu, C. J., Fuchs, C. S., Ogino, S., & Garraway, L. A.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
857-865
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2339723519
Cited by
913
References
32
FWCI
47.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.