Cited by 271Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychological Testing and Assessment

Avolition and expressive deficits capture negative symptom phenomenology: Implications for DSM-5 and schizophrenia research

Open access
Messinger, Julie W., Trémeau, Fabien, Antonius, Daniel, Mendelsohn, Erika, Prudent, Vasthie, Stanford, Arielle D., Malaspina, Dolores·2011·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The DSM-5 formulation presents an opportunity to refine the negative symptom assessments that are crucial for a schizophrenia diagnosis. This review traces the history of negative symptom constructs in neuropsychiatry from their earliest conceptualizations in the 19th century. It presents the relevant literature for distinguishing between different types of negative symptoms. Although a National Institute of Mental Health consensus initiative proposed that there are five separate negative symptom domains, our review of the individual items demonstrates no more than three negative symptom domains. Indeed, numerous factor analyses of separate negative symptom scales routinely identify only two domains: 1) expressive deficits, which include affective, linguistic and paralinguistic expressions, and 2) avolition for daily life and social activities. We propose that a focus on expressive deficits and avolition will be of optimum utility for diagnosis, treatment-considerations, and research purposes compared to other negative symptom constructs. We recommend that these two domains should be assessed as separate dimensions in the DSM-5 criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.002

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messinger, J. W., Trémeau, F., Antonius, D., Mendelsohn, E., Prudent, V., Stanford, A. D., & Malaspina, D.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
161-168
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089011671
Cited by
271
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5rc1mh088843-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH076976, R01MH066428, K24-MH01699, RC1-MH088843, K24MH001699)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
negative symptoms, schizophrenia, avolition, DSM-5, emotional expression, language expression, social functioning
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review