Cited by 118Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder

Open access
Kuckertz, Jennie M., Gildebrant, Elena, Liliequist, Björn, Karlström, Petra, Väppling, Camilla, Bodlund, Owe, Stenlund, Therése, Hofmann, Stefan G. +3 more·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

UNLABELLED: While attention modification programs (AMP) have shown promise as laboratory-based treatments for social anxiety disorder, trials of internet-delivered AMP have not yielded significant differences between active and control conditions. To address these inconsistencies, we examined the moderational and mediational role of attention bias in the efficacy of attention training. We compared data reported by Carlbring et al. (2012) to an identical AMP condition, with the exception that participants were instructed to activate social anxiety fears prior to each attention training session (AMP + FACT; n = 39). We also compared all attention training groups to an internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) condition (n = 40). Participants in the AMP + FACT group experienced greater reductions in social anxiety symptoms than both active (n = 40) and control (n = 39) groups reported by Carlbring et al., and did not differ in symptom reductions from the iCBT group. Higher attention bias predicted greater symptom reductions for participants who completed AMP, but not for the control group. Moreover, change in attention bias mediated the relationship between AMP group (active condition reported by Carlbring et al. versus AMP + FACT) and change in social anxiety symptoms. These results suggest the importance of interpreting findings related to symptom change in attention training studies in the context of bias effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN01715124.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2013.12.003

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuckertz, J. M., Gildebrant, E., Liliequist, B., Karlström, P., Väppling, C., Bodlund, O., Stenlund, T., Hofmann, S. G., Andersson, G., Amir, N., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Carlbring, Per
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
53
Pages
30-40
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109887133
Cited by
117
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7
FWCI
17.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, attention training, attentional bias, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, mediation, moderation, symptom change
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review