The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Human early visual cortex was traditionally thought to process simple visual features such as orientation, contrast, and spatial frequency via feedforward input from the lateral geniculate nucleus (e.g., [1]). However, the role of nonretinal influence on early visual cortex is so far insufficiently investigated despite much evidence that feedback connections greatly outnumber feedforward connections [2-5]. Here, we explored in five fMRI experiments how information originating from audition and imagery affects the brain activity patterns in early visual cortex in the absence of any feedforward visual stimulation. We show that category-specific information from both complex natural sounds and imagery can be read out from early visual cortex activity in blindfolded participants. The coding of nonretinal information in the activity patterns of early visual cortex is common across actual auditory perception and imagery and may be mediated by higher-level multisensory areas. Furthermore, this coding is robust to mild manipulations of attention and working memory but affected by orthogonal, cognitively demanding visuospatial processing. Crucially, the information fed down to early visual cortex is category specific and generalizes to sound exemplars of the same category, providing evidence for abstract information feedback rather than precise pictorial feedback. Our results suggest that early visual cortex receives nonretinal input from other brain areas when it is generated by auditory perception and/or imagery, and this input carries common abstract information. Our findings are compatible with feedback of predictive information to the earliest visual input level (e.g., [6]), in line with predictive coding models [7-10].
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using fMRI and multivariate pattern analysis in blindfolded participants, this paper shows that category-specific information from natural sounds and auditory imagery can be decoded from early visual cortex activity without feedforward visual stimulation. The feedback appears abstract/categorical rather than pictorial, is robust to mild attention/working-memory interference, and is disrupted by demanding visuospatial processing.
Key findings
- In experiment 1, a linear SVM discriminated three natural sounds (bird singing, traffic noise, talking crowd) from early visual cortex, particularly V2 and V3, at about 42%; classification also succeeded in auditory cortex but not motor cortex.
- In experiment 2, imagined sounds were decoded from V1 and auditory cortex, and cross-classification between sound perception and imagery succeeded in V1 and V2, indicating shared activity patterns across real and imagined sounds.
- In experiment 3, decoding during natural sound stimulation remained successful mainly in peripheral regions and consistently in V2 despite an orthogonal auditory working-memory task; in experiment 4, a demanding visuospatial imagery task left only residual above-chance classification in far-peripheral V2.
- In experiment 5, “human” versus “inanimate” sound categories were classified in several early visual areas for eight out of nine exemplar combinations, and cross-classification across different exemplars within a category succeeded in V2 and V3 in two out of three combinations, supporting abstract/categorical feedback rather than precise pictorial reinstatement.
Methods
- Five fMRI experiments with blindfolded participants omitted visual stimulation while subjects listened to natural sounds, imagined sounds from word cues, or performed orthogonal cognitive tasks during sound stimulation.
- Activity patterns were extracted from retinotopically mapped V1, V2, and V3 and analyzed with multivariate pattern classification, primarily a linear support vector machine; whole-brain searchlight analyses identified other regions carrying sound/imagery content.
- Univariate GLM analyses tested whether decoding was driven by positive activation or deactivation; cross-classification tested generalization between perception and imagery and across sound exemplars within categories.
Limitations
- The paper states that classification accuracies were relatively low, describing the results as proof of principle and robust across subject and stimulus samples.
- The paper notes that without feedforward stimulation, it is difficult to study the functional role of nonretinal feedback in actual visual perception.
- The paper states that whether the proposed pathways play a causal role in inducing differential activity patterns remains to be investigated; the provided text also does not report exact sample sizes per experiment.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crucially, cross-classification succeeded in V2 and V3 in two out of three combinations, i.e., training the classifier for the pair “traffic 1” versus “people 1” lead to successful classification of “traffic 2” versus “people 2,” and training the classifier for the pair “traffic 2” versus “people 2” lead to successful classification of “airplane” versus “kids” (Figure 3H; Table S1).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Category Specificity of the Information Fed Back to Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cross-classification succeeded in V1 and V2 (Figure 2G).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In auditory cortex, cross-classification did not succeed, indicating that activity patterns induced by feedforward auditory stimulation are coded differently than those induced by feedback through auditory imagery.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In experiments 3 and 4, the secondary tasks activated early visual areas consistent with an engagement of object attention.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Univariate Activation Profile
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In experiments 1 and 2, real and imagined sounds could be decoded in parts of the precuneus and in posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) (see overlapping regions in Figure 4).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Whole-Brain Searchlight Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sounds and, to a lesser extent, imagined sounds were successfully classified in a network of frontal regions, including superior and middle frontal sulci.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Whole-Brain Searchlight Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activity patterns during natural sound stimulation were again successfully decoded from early visual cortex, mainly in peripheral regions and consistently in V2 (Figures 3B and 3C). This demonstrates that simultaneous retention of orthogonal contents in working memory did not strongly affect classification.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sounds while Manipulating Cognitive Resources
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The classifier successfully discriminated the three different sounds in early visual cortex, particularly in V2 and V3 (at ∼42%; see Figure 2; for results with increased statistical power, see Figure S1A).”
- Also stated in: § Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex · plain
“Hence, activity patterns in early visual cortex contained sufficient information from auditory stimulation to allow the content-specific discrimination of natural sounds.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The univariate activity profile also showed that classification was not driven by one sound eliciting more attention-related activity than another sound (Figure S3).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unsurprisingly, sounds could be decoded in a large part of bilateral superior temporal sulcus mostly belonging to auditory cortex (Figure 4).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Whole-Brain Searchlight Results
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 24
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even at very liberal thresholds (p < 0.05 uncorrected; Figure S3), listening to sounds in the absence of visual stimulation elicited no positive activation in early visual areas but instead elicited a weak deactivation, consistent with previous findings (e.g.,[16]) and in contrast to classical findings for visual mental imagery [17, 18].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Univariate Activation Profile
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Successful discrimination of imagined sounds was observed in both foveal and peripheral areas of early visual cortex (but not far periphery), in V1 and auditory cortex (Figures 2E and 2F; classification of real sounds replicated the results of experiment 1, cf. Figure S1B).”
- Also stated in: § Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex · hedged
“Therefore, even in the absence of both visual and auditory stimulation, the contents of mental imagery could be decoded from both V1 and auditory cortex.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Imagery (experiment 2) elicited no positive activity but exhibited weak deactivations in both early visual and auditory cortices.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Univariate Activation Profile
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the classifier failed to discriminate the three natural sounds in most of early visual cortex, residual above-chance classification remained in the far periphery of V2 (Figures 3E and 3F) despite the orthogonal engagement of attentionally demanding active visuospatial processing.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sounds while Manipulating Cognitive Resources
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, higher visual areas project back to V1 the associated color of grayscale objects [36] or the predicted motion path of an apparent motion illusion [37, 38].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Bannert, 2013, Decoding the yellow of a gray banana, Curr. Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [37] Muckli, 2005, Primary visual cortex activity along the apparent-motion trace reflects illusory perception, PLoS Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Vetter, 2013, TMS over V5 disrupts motion prediction, Cereb. Cortex
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our findings are compatible with feedback of predictive information to the earliest visual input level (e.g., [6]), in line with predictive coding models [7–10].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Mumford, 1992, On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops, Biol. Cybern. source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Friston, 2010, The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Clark, 2013, Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, Behav. Brain Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Bar, 2007, The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions, Trends Cogn. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Bastos, 2012, Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding, Neuron source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crucially, the information fed down to early visual cortex is category specific and generalizes to sound exemplars of the same category, providing evidence for abstract information feedback rather than precise pictorial feedback.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, this coding is robust to mild manipulations of attention and working memory but affected by orthogonal, cognitively demanding visuospatial processing.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This demonstrates that both sounds and imagery cues induced similar activity patterns in early visual cortex and that feedback information is coded consistently across imagery and auditory perception.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Decoding of Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that despite relatively low classification accuracies, our series of experiments replicated the successful decoding of sounds in early visual areas several times, demonstrating proof of principle and the robustness of our results across different subject and stimulus samples.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the context of our findings, we suggest that the content-specific information from sounds, when they are heard and/or imagined, is relayed from auditory cortex to early visual cortex via pSTS and precuneus, eliciting differential activity patterns in both of these regions.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The coding of nonretinal information in the activity patterns of early visual cortex is common across actual auditory perception and imagery and may be mediated by higher-level multisensory areas.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results suggest that early visual cortex receives nonretinal input from other brain areas when it is generated by auditory perception and/or imagery, and this input carries common abstract information.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The precuneus has been identified as an area responding to both visual and auditory stimuli and possibly serving as an audiovisual convergence area [25].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Hertz, 2010, Disentangling unisensory and multisensory components in audiovisual integration using a novel multifrequency fMRI spectral analysis, Neuroimage source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results of experiment 5 suggest that the information that is fed down to early visual cortex is not only content specific but also category specific, i.e., related to the information shared by sound exemplars of the same category.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The findings of experiment 5 furthermore demonstrate that the successful decoding in experiment 1 was not specific to the first sound exemplars we used and could not be caused by differential low-level acoustic features of the sounds (e.g., frequency distribution).”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that information feedback is unlikely to be caused by an exact pictorial representation but instead contains abstract and possibly semantic information.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Apart from the route via multisensory areas, there is evidence for multisensory integration on the subcortical level [27] and for direct anatomical connections between early auditory and early visual areas [12, 28, 29], mostly reaching peripheral regions [12–14], consistent with both our eccentricity and searchlight results.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] van den Brink, 2013, Subcortical, modality-specific pathways contribute to multisensory processing in humans, Cereb. Cortex
- Not checked yetcites [12] Eckert, 2008, A cross-modal system linking primary auditory and visual cortices: evidence from intrinsic fMRI connectivity analysis, Hum. Brain Mapp. source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Beer, 2013, Combined diffusion-weighted and functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals a temporal-occipital network involved in auditory-visual object processing, Front Integr Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Beer, 2011, Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex, Exp. Brain Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Rockland, 2003, Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey, Int. J. Psychophysiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Cate, 2009, Auditory attention activates peripheral visual cortex, PLoS ONE source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This also means that our results were not caused by an unspecific attention effect or a simple reactivation of early visual cortex due to pictorial visual mental imagery.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results demonstrate that the information arriving in early visual cortex is categorical and independent of its exact source.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context [31, 32], from objects presented in the periphery [33], and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived [34, 35].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Smith, 2010, Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Ban, 2013, Topographic representation of an occluded object and the effects of spatiotemporal context in human early visual areas, J. Neurosci. source
- Not checked yetcites [33] Williams, 2008, Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex, Nat. Neurosci. source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Harrison, 2009, Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [35] Albers, 2013, Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex, Curr. Biol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Also, hippocampal projections to peripheral early visual regions have been demonstrated in the context of boundary extension for scene processing [30].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Chadwick, 2013, The hippocampus extrapolates beyond the view in scenes: an fMRI study of boundary extension, Cortex source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“pSTS is implicated in audiovisual integration and has been shown to feed down information to primary visual and auditory cortices [26].”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Naumer, 2011, Investigating human audio-visual object perception with a combination of hypothesis-generating and hypothesis-testing fMRI analysis tools, Exp. Brain Res. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, the information contained in these activity patterns is generalizable across different sound exemplars within a category, demonstrating that sounds trigger shared categorical information transfer to early visual cortex rather than a fine-grained pictorial representation.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Results > Category Specificity of the Information Fed Back to Early Visual Cortex
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, previous accounts suggested that prediction and mental imagery may involve overlapping brain mechanisms [6, 43, 44], and mental imagery might have evolved from predictive brain mechanisms.”
§ Decoding Sound and Imagery Content in Early Visual Cortex > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Mumford, 1992, On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops, Biol. Cybern. source
- Not checked yetcites [43] Maguire, 2013, The hippocampus: a manifesto for change, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. source
- Not checked yetcites [44] Moulton, 2009, Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The word cues “forest,” “traffic,” and “people” reliably elicit the intended mental imagery of the corresponding sounds and natural scenes in subjects.
“Subjects were instructed to engage in mental imagery of the sounds and a corresponding natural scene.”
“runs in which subjects solely imagined the sounds upon hearing the word cues “forest,” “traffic,” or “people””
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that feedback from higher- to lower-level sensory cortices carries spatiotemporally precise and context-specific predictions (25–29).”
From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citations
Cites
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120 · cited 3×
“, [6]), in line with predictive coding models [7–10].”
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924 · cited 2×
“, [6]), in line with predictive coding models [7–10].”
Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding
Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.038 · Cited by 2,421 · cited 2×
“, [6]), in line with predictive coding models [7–10].”
Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07832 · Cited by 1,347
The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
Bar, M. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,144
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: II The role of cortico-cortical loops
Mumford, D. (1992) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00198477 · Cited by 1,074
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop
Mumford, D. (1991) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202389 · Cited by 929
Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex
Markov, N. T., Vezoli, J., Chameau, P., Falchier, A., Quilodran, R., Huissoud, C., Lamy, C., Misery, P., Giroud, P., Ullman, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23458 · Cited by 759
Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function
Salin, P. A., & Bullier, J. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.1.107 · Cited by 636
Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey
Rockland, K. S., & Ojima, H. (2003) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00121-1 · Cited by 564
Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex
Albers, A. M., Kok, P., Toni, I., Dijkerman, H. C., & de Lange, F. P. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.065 · Cited by 528
Visual mental imagery induces retinotopically organized activation of early visual areas
Slotnick, S. D., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi035 · Cited by 458
Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · Cited by 421
The hippocampus: a manifesto for change
Maguire, E. A., & Mullally, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033650 · Cited by 393 · cited 2×
“In fact, previous accounts suggested that prediction and mental imagerymay involve overlapping brainmechanisms [6, 43, 44], and mental imagery might have evolved from predictive brain mechanisms.”
Deactivation of Sensory-Specific Cortex by Cross-Modal Stimuli
Laurienti, P. J., Burdette, J. H., Wallace, M. T., Yen, Y., Field, A. S., & Stein, B. E. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361930 · Cited by 380
Stelzer, J., Chen, Y., & Turner, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.063 · Cited by 372
Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain
Walther, D. B., Caddigan, E., Fei-Fei, L., & Beck, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0559-09.2009 · Cited by 336
Top-down activation of shape-specific population codes in visual cortex during mental imagery
Stokes, M., Thompson, R., Cusack, R., & Duncan, J. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4657-08.2009 · Cited by 323
Reading the mind's eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery
Reddy, L., Tsuchiya, N., & Serre, T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.084 · Cited by 296
Rapid and Reversible Recruitment of Early Visual Cortex for Touch
Merabet, L. B., Hamilton, R. H., Schlaug, G., Swisher, J. D., Kiriakopoulos, E. T., Pitskel, N. B., Kauffman, T., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003046 · Cited by 292
Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics
Martuzzi, R., Murray, M. M., Michel, C. M., Thiran, J., Maeder, P. P., Clarke, S., & Meuli, R. A. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl077 · Cited by 287
Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception
Amedi, A., Malach, R., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.032 · Cited by 271
Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects
Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.055 · Cited by 263
Distinct Roles of the Cortical Layers of Area V1 in Figure-Ground Segregation
Self, M. W., van Kerkoerle, T., Supèr, H., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.013 · Cited by 249
Imagery and perception share cortical representations of content and location
Cichy, R. M., Heinzle, J., & Haynes, J.-D. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr106 · Cited by 242
Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context
Smith, F. W., & Muckli, L. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000233107 · Cited by 238
Self-citationFeedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex
Williams, M. A., Baker, C. I., Op de Beeck, H. P., Mok Shim, W., Dang, S., Triantafyllou, C., & Kanwisher, N. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2218 · Cited by 235
Primary visual cortex activity along the apparent-motion trace reflects illusory perception
Muckli, L., Kohler, A., Kriegeskorte, N., & Singer, W. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030265 · Cited by 225
Self-citationChen, Y.-C., & Spence, C. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.012 · Cited by 221
Singer, W. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.006 · Cited by 214
Network interactions: non-geniculate input to V1
Muckli, L. F., & Petro, L. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.020 · Cited by 212
Self-citationThe Foveal Confluence in Human Visual Cortex
Schira, M. M., Tyler, C. W., Breakspear, M. J., & Špehar, B. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1760-09.2009 · Cited by 176
Decoding the yellow of a gray banana
Bannert, M. M., & Bartels, A. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.016 · Cited by 146
Information mapping with pattern classifiers: A comparative study
Pereira, F., & Botvinick, M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.026 · Cited by 140
Eckert, M. A., Kamdar, N. V., Chang, C. E., Beckmann, C. F., Greicius, M. D., & Menon, V. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20560 · Cited by 138
Predicting visual stimuli on the basis of activity in auditory cortices
Meyer, K., Kaplan, J., Essex, R., Webber, C., Damásio, H., & Damásio, A. R. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2533 · Cited by 130
Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex
Beer, A. L., Plank, T., & Greenlee, M. W. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2715-y · Cited by 124
Seeing Touch Is Correlated with Content-Specific Activity in Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Meyer, K., Kaplan, J., Essex, R., Damásio, H., & Damásio, A. R. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq289 · Cited by 121
Auditory attention activates peripheral visual cortex
Cate, A. D., Herron, T. J., Yund, E. W., Stecker, G. C., Rinne, T., Kang, X., Petkov, C. I., Disbrow, E. A., & Woods, D. L. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004645 · Cited by 111
Bilateral visual field maps in a patient with only one hemisphere
Muckli, L. F., Naumer, M. J., & Singer, W. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809688106 · Cited by 90
Self-citationPhenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: Two approaches to perception research
Spillmann, L. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.022 · Cited by 81
Ban, H., Yamamoto, H., Hanakawa, T., Urayama, S.-I., Aso, T., Fukuyama, H., & Ejima, Y. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1455-12.2013 · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“For example, activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context [31, 32], from objects presented in the periphery [33], and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived [34, 35].”
The hippocampus extrapolates beyond the view in scenes: an fMRI study of boundary extension
Chadwick, M. J., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.010 · Cited by 80
Dynamic Premotor-to-Parietal Interactions during Spatial Imagery
Sack, A. T., Jacobs, C., Martino, F. D., Staeren, N., Goebel, R., & Formisano, E. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2656-08.2008 · Cited by 73
Subcortical, Modality-Specific Pathways Contribute to Multisensory Processing in Humans
van den Brink, R. L., Cohen, M. X., der Burg, E. V., Talsma, D., Vissers, M. E., & Slagter, H. A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht069 · Cited by 67
TMS Over V5 Disrupts Motion Prediction
Vetter, P., Grosbras, M.-H., & Muckli, L. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht297 · Cited by 66
Self-citationDecoding Visual Object Categories in Early Somatosensory Cortex
Smith, F. W., & Goodale, M. A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht292 · Cited by 58
Self-citationBeer, A. L., Plank, T., Meyer, G., & Greenlee, M. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00005 · Cited by 53
Hertz, U., & Amedi, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.186 · Cited by 43
Naumer, M. J., van den Bosch, J. J. F., Wibral, M., Kohler, A., Singer, W., Kaiser, J., van de Ven, V., & Muckli, L. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2669-0 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000965 · Cited by 1,200
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis
Sterzer, P., Adams, R. A., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Lawrie, S. M., Muckli, L., Petrovic, P., Uhlhaas, P., Voss, M., & Corlett, P. R. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015 · Cited by 941
Self-citationA voxel-wise encoding model for early visual areas decodes mental images of remembered scenes
Naselaris, T., Olman, C. A., Stansbury, D. E., Uǧurbil, K., & Gallant, J. L. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.018 · Cited by 386
Zadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx202 · Cited by 281
Zadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · doi:10.1101/081208 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Vetter, P., Smith, F. W., & Muckli, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vetter, Petra
- Muckli, Lars
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1256-1262
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4046224
- OpenAlex
- W2016034937
- Semantic Scholar
- e40eefc9d7e41953e2a24e0bfd9701be9b8752bd
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 32.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G005044/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- early visual cortex, auditory imagery, auditory perception, top-down feedback, multisensory integration, predictive coding, abstract information, visuospatial processing, attention, working memory, blindfolded participants
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review