Cited by 148Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsFree Will and AgencyHallucinations in medical conditions

Neurological and robot-controlled induction of an apparition

Open access
Blanke, Olaf, Pozeg, Polona, Hara, Masayuki, Heydrich, Lukas, Serino, Andrea, Yamamoto, Akio, Higuchi, Toshiro, Salomon, Roy +6 more·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

Tales of ghosts, wraiths, and other apparitions have been reported in virtually all cultures. The strange sensation that somebody is nearby when no one is actually present and cannot be seen (feeling of a presence, FoP) is a fascinating feat of the human mind, and this apparition is often covered in the literature of divinity, occultism, and fiction. Although it is described by neurological and psychiatric patients and healthy individuals in different situations, it is not yet understood how the phenomenon is triggered by the brain. Here, we performed lesion analysis in neurological FoP patients, supported by an analysis of associated neurological deficits. Our data show that the FoP is an illusory own-body perception with well-defined characteristics that is associated with sensorimotor loss and caused by lesions in three distinct brain regions: temporoparietal, insular, and especially frontoparietal cortex. Based on these data and recent experimental advances of multisensory own-body illusions, we designed a master-slave robotic system that generated specific sensorimotor conflicts and enabled us to induce the FoP and related illusory own-body perceptions experimentally in normal participants. These data show that the illusion of feeling another person nearby is caused by misperceiving the source and identity of sensorimotor (tactile, proprioceptive, and motor) signals of one's own body. Our findings reveal the neural mechanisms of the FoP, highlight the subtle balance of brain mechanisms that generate the experience of "self" and "other," and advance the understanding of the brain mechanisms responsible for hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample size was derived from power analysis targeting an effect size of 0.6 for the present experiments.

    “Sample size was derived from power analysis of previous BSC studies [97,98] and previous studies on mental time travel [28,30]. According to these studies, our target effect size was 0.6 for the present experiments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanke, O., Pozeg, P., Hara, M., Heydrich, L., Serino, A., Yamamoto, A., Higuchi, T., Salomon, R., Seeck, M., Landis, T., Arzy, S., Herbelin, B., Bleuler, H., & Rognini, G.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Blanke, Olaf
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
24
Issue
22
Pages
2681-2686
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998707755
Cited by
148
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Fondation Roger de Spoelberch
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26700027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
ghosts, multisensory illusions, master-slave robot system, temporoparietal cortex, insula, frontoparietal cortex, self-other perception, brain lesions, proprioception, tactile perception
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Illusions, Robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review