Cited by 63Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Oxytocin enhances cognitive control of food craving in women

Open access
Striepens, Nadine, Schröter, Franziska, Stoffel‐Wagner, Birgit, Maier, Wolfgang, Hurlemann, René, Scheele, Dirk·2016·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

In developed countries, obesity has become an epidemic resulting in enormous health care costs for society and serious medical complications for individuals. The homeostatic regulation of food intake is critically dependent on top‐down control of reward‐driven food craving. There is accumulating evidence from animal studies that the neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) is involved in regulating hunger states and eating behavior, but whether OXT also contributes to cognitive control of food craving in humans is still unclear. We conducted a counter‐balanced, double‐blind, within‐subject, pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging experiment involving 31 healthy women who received 24 IU of intranasal OXT or placebo and were scanned twice while they were exposed to pictures of palatable food. The participants were instructed either to imagine the immediate consumption or to cognitively control the urge to eat the food. Our results show a trend that OXT specifically reduced food craving in the cognitive control condition. On the neural level, these findings were paralleled by an increase of activity in the middle and superior frontal gyrus, precuneus, and cingulate cortex under OXT. Interestingly, the behavioral OXT effect correlated with the OXT‐induced changes in the prefrontal cortex and precuneus. Collectively, the present study provides first evidence that OXT plays a key role in the cognitive regulation of food craving in women by strengthening activity in a broad neurocircuitry implicated in top‐down control and self‐referential processing. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4276–4285, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23308

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin strengthens top-down cognitive control by increasing middle frontal gyrus activity.

    “Additionally, OXT strengthens top-down cognitive control strengthens top-down cognitive control by enhancing activity in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) (Eckstein et al., 2015;Striepens et al., 2016).”

    From Oxytocin enhances the pain‐relieving effects of social support in romantic couples (2019) · cites this paper as Striepens et al., 2016

  • An oxytocin-induced increase in prefrontal cortex activity may reflect enhanced top-down cognitive control.

    “Additionally, an OXT-induced increase in activity in the PFC, where OXT receptors are highly expressed (Boccia, Petrusz, Suzuki, Marson, & Pedersen, 2013), may reflect enhanced top-down cognitive control that has been previously observed in the context of food craving behavior (Striepens et al., 2016) and fear extinction (Eckstein et al., 2015).”

    From Oxytocin enhances the pain‐relieving effects of social support in romantic couples (2019) · cites this paper as Striepens et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Striepens, N., Schröter, F., Stoffel‐Wagner, B., Maier, W., Hurlemann, R., & Scheele, D.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Scheele, Dirk
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-06
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
4276-4285
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2462547029
Cited by
63
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG]) (HU1202/4-1 and BE 5465/2-1 (to R.H. and D.S.).)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, food cravings, cognitive control, top-down control, women, obesity, dietary habits, prefrontal cortex, precuneus, cingulate cortex, self-referential processing, intranasal administration, palatable food
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Eating, Female, Food, Homeostasis, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Oxytocin, Psychotropic Drugs, Executive Function, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review