Cited by 142Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Being a cybervictim and a cyberbully – The duality of cyberbullying: A meta-analysis

Open access
Lozano-Blasco, Raquel, Cortés-Pascual, Alejandra, Latorre-Martínez, M.Pilar·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106444

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lozano-Blasco, R., Cortés-Pascual, A., & Latorre-Martínez, M. P.
Affiliations
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Corresponding author
Lozano-Blasco, Raquel
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
111
Pages
106444
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033943656
Cited by
142
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyber victimization, adolescents, family communication, parental styles, problematic internet use, cross-cultural comparison, depression, anxiety, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review