Cited by 39Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric properties of Internet-administered measures of health anxiety: An investigation of the Health Anxiety Inventory, the Illness Attitude Scales, and the Whiteley Index

Hedman, Erik, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Andersson, Erik, Andersson, Gerhard, Lindefors, Nils, Rück, Christian, Axelsson, Erland, Lekander, Mats·2015·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Background The Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI), the Illness Attitude Scales (IAS), and the Whiteley Index (WI) are three of the most widely used health anxiety measures, but their psychometric properties have not been investigated when administered via the Internet.Methods We investigated the three instruments' test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity and sensitivity to change using one sample (n=111) of participants with severe health anxiety and one sample of healthy controls (n=92).Results The HAI, IAS, and WI showed high test-retest reliability (rs≥.80), good convergent, and discriminant validity and were sensitive to detect change. The HAI and IAS (αs≥.85), but not the WI (αs≤.60) demonstrated high internal consistency.Conclusions The HAI, IAS, and WI have good psychometric properties, except for the low internal consistency of WI, when used as Internet-administered measures of health anxiety. Using these measures over the Internet offers highly important advantages such as increased ease of administration, reduced attrition, and cost-efficient treatment evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.01.008

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, E., Andersson, G., Lindefors, N., Rück, C., Axelsson, E., & Lekander, M.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
31
Pages
32-37
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968637496
Cited by
39
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
health anxiety, psychometric properties, Health Anxiety Inventory, Whiteley Index, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, sensitivity to change
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review