Cited by 97Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and Diversity

Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving

Carr, Priyanka B., Steele, Claude M.·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.003

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under stereotype threat, people are more likely to persevere with an ineffective problem-solving strategy.

    “a paper investigating stereotype threat found that under threat, people are more likely to persevere with an ineffective problem-solving strategy (Carr & Steele, 2009)”
  • Stereotype threat increases women's inflexible perseverance, making them less likely to abandon ineffective strategies under threat relative to no threat.

    “For example, researchers have shown that stereotype threat increased women's inflexible perseverance, that is, women were less likely to abandon ineffective strategies and choose newer more efficient ones under threat relative to no threat conditions (Carr & Steele, 2009).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Carr & Steele, 2009

  • Stereotype-based concerns make women less fluent, use more tentative language, and alter their decision making.

    “Stereotype-based concerns have also been shown to make women less fluent and use more tentative language (McGlone & Pfiester, 2015) and to alter their decision making (Carr & Steele, 2009;2010).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Carr & Steele, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carr, P. B., & Steele, C. M.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Carr, Priyanka B.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
853-859
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121110410
Cited by
96
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
23.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
stereotype threat, problem solving, women, stereotype suppression, mathematical ability, spatial ability, strategic flexibility, test performance, gender stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review