Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 910

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?

Open access
González-Romá, Vicente, Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Bakker, Arnold B., Lloret, Susana·2006·Journal of Vocational Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Coombs, 1960, On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding, Psychometrika, 25, 219, 10.1007/BF02289726 · DOI
  2. Coders, 1993, A review and integration of research on job burnout, Academy of Management Review, 18, 621, 10.5465/amr.1993.9402210153 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Davison, 1977, On a metric, unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data, Psychometrika, 42, 523, 10.1007/BF02295977 · DOI
  4. Green, 1991, The three-factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 453
  5. Lloret, 2000, Medición de constructos bipolares mediante escalas tipo Likert: por qué aparecen factores monopolares? [Measurement of bipolar constructs with Likert-type scales: Why do unipolar factors emerge?], Psicothema, 12, 471
  6. Lloret, 2003, How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 956, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.956 · DOI
  7. Loevinger, 1948, The technique of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507, 10.1037/h0055827 · DOI
  8. Molenaar, 1982, Mokken scaling revisited, Kwantitatieve Methoden, 8, 145
  9. Molenaar, 1991, A weighted Lowvinger H-coefficient extending Mokken scaling to multicategory items, Kwantitatieve Methoden, 37, 97
  10. Salanova, 2001, Desde el ‘burnout’ al ‘engagement’: Una nueva perspectiva [From burnout to engagement: A new perspective], Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y Organizaciones, 16, 117
  11. Schaufeli, 2001, Werk en welbevinden: Naar een positieve benadering in de Arbeids-en Gezondheidspsychologie [Work and well-being: Towards a positive approach in Occupational Health Psychology], Gedrag & Organisatie, 14, 229
  12. Shirom, 2003, Job-related burnout: A review, 245
  13. Van Schuur, 1994, Why factor analysis is often the wrong model for analysing bipolar concepts and what model to use instead, Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 97, 10.1177/014662169401800201 · DOI
  14. Watson, 1999, Issues in the dimensional structure of affect effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response format: comment on Russell and Carroll (1999), Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601, 10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.601 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Lloret, S.
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
165-174
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.003
OpenAlex
W2168064208
Cited by
910
References
6
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.