The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products
Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., & Shiina, T. (2009) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.016 · Cited by 993
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569
Cited by
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13959 · Cited by 3,026
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M. C., Thornton, P. K., Blümmel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D., & Obersteiner, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308149110 · Cited by 1,254
Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A. N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2925 · Cited by 1,045
Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082 · Cited by 1,017
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5 · Cited by 989
Environmental impacts of cultured meat production
Tuomisto, H. L., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200130u · Cited by 891
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849
Nijdam, D., Rood, T., & Westhoek, H. (2012) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002 · Cited by 734
Trends in Microalgae Incorporation Into Innovative Food Products With Potential Health Benefits
Caporgno, M. P., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00058 · Cited by 639
Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., & Milo, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1402183111 · Cited by 466
AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology
Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2023) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001 · Cited by 438
Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption
Van Zanten, H. H. E., Herrero, M., Van Hal, O., Röös, E., Muller, A., Garnett, T., Gerber, P. J., Schader, C., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14321 · Cited by 406
Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: a review of life cycle assessments
de Vries, M., van Middelaar, C. E., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2015) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.020 · Cited by 276
Environmental impacts of beef production: Review of challenges and perspectives for durability
Gerber, P. J., Mottet, A., Opio, C. I., Falcucci, A., & Teillard, F. (2015) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.013 · Cited by 248
Environmental impacts of food consumption and nutrition: Where are we and what is next?
Nemecek, T., Jungbluth, N., i Canals, L. M., & Schenck, R. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1071-3 · Cited by 219
Reducing the land use of EU pork production: Where there’s swill, there’s a way
zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J., Phalan, B., Green, R. E., & Balmford, A. (2016) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 · Cited by 210
Van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Bikker, P., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0923-6 · Cited by 185
Koyande, A. K., Show, P.-L., Guo, R., Tang, B., Ogino, C., & Chang, J.-S. (2019) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2019.1679697 · Cited by 182
RetractedClimate change and north american rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Joyce, L. A., Briske, D. D., Brown, J. R., Polley, H. W., McCarl, B. A., & Bailey, D. W. (2013) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/rem-d-12-00142.1 · Cited by 158
Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: mitigation and adaptation options
Rivera‐Ferre, M. G., López‐i‐Gelats, F., Howden, M., Smith, P., Morton, J. F., & Herrero, M. (2016) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.421 · Cited by 157
Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers’ perception of protein products
Lazzarini, G. A., Zimmermann, J., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.038 · Cited by 145
Picasso, V. D., Modernel, P. D., Becoña, G., Salvo, L., Gutiérrez, L., & Astigarraga, L. (2014) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.005 · Cited by 113
What place for livestock on a re-greening earth?
Janzen, H. H. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.055 · Cited by 109
Wiedemann, S. G., Ledgard, S. F., Henry, B. K., Yan, M.-J., Mao, N., & Russell, S. J. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0849-z · Cited by 103
Lynch, J. (2019) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.003 · Cited by 99
Noya, I., González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Fiala, M., & Moreira, M. T. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.132 · Cited by 81
Zhang, H., Hortal, M., Dobon, A., Bermudez, J. M., & Lara‐Lledo, M. (2015) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2135 · Cited by 80
Berton, M., Agabriel, J., Gallo, L., Lherm, M., Ramanzin, M., & Sturaro, E. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.005 · Cited by 45
Leveraging microalgae as a sustainable ingredient for meat analogues
Zhu, J., Xiao, X., Du, W., Cai, Y., Yang, Z., Yin, Y., Wakisaka, M., Wang, J., Zhou, Z., Liu, D., et al. (2024) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139360 · Cited by 45
Greenhouse gas mitigation co-benefits across the global agricultural development programs
Khatri-Chhetri, A., Costa Junior, C., & Wollenberg, E. (2022) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102586 · Cited by 36
Consumers’ willingness-to-buy pasta with microalgae proteins–which label can promote sales?
Van der Stricht, H., Profeta, A., Hung, Y., & Verbeke, W. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104948 · Cited by 33
Novel microalgae-based foods: what influences singaporean consumers’ acceptance?
Wassmann, B., Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2024) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105068 · Cited by 29
Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review
Bonnet, C., & Coinon, M. (2024) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105017 · Cited by 22
Comparative life cycle assessment of industrial and artisanal spirulina production systems
Vannini, V., & Achten, W. M. J. (2025) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180184 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- de Vries, M., & de Boer, I. J. M.
- Venue
- Livestock Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1871-1413 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968886926
- Cited by
- 1,237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
