Cited by 382Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Functional inactivation of the lateral and basal nuclei of the amygdala by muscimol infusion prevents fear conditioning to an explicit conditioned stimulus and to contextual stimuli.

Muller, Jeff, Corodimas, Keith P., Fridel, Zhanna, LeDoux, Joseph E.·1997·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The GABAa agonist, muscimol (0.5 microgram in 0.5 microliter saline), or vehicle was infused into the lateral and basal amygdala nuclei prior to fear conditioning or testing in rats. Rats given muscimol before conditioning and saline before testing showed much less freezing to the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the context than did controls given saline before training and testing. Rats given saline before training and muscimol prior to testing also showed low levels of freezing to the CS and the context. In follow-up procedures, rats with acquisition initially blocked by pretraining muscimol infusions froze in a manner similar to that of controls when retrained and retested with saline infusions. Rats trained with saline but tested with muscimol presumably became conditioned but could express the learning. When retested with saline, they froze in the same manner as controls. Thus, activity in the lateral and basal amygdala appears to play an essential role in the acquisition and expression of fear conditioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.683

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning.

    “Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning (8–18).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muller, J., Corodimas, K. P., Fridel, Z., & LeDoux, J. E.
Affiliations
  • City College of New York (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
1997-08
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
683-691
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2009915667
Cited by
382
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
amygdala, lateral amygdala, basal amygdala, fear conditioning, muscimol, GABA-A receptor agonists, contextual fear, freezing behavior, fear acquisition, fear expression, neural inactivation
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fear, Male, Motor Activity, Muscimol, Mental Recall, Receptors, GABA-A, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, GABA Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review