Cited by 107Psychedelics and Drug StudiesHallucinations in medical conditionsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Classical hallucinogens and neuroimaging: A systematic review of human studies

dos Santos, Rafael G., Osório, Flávia L., Crippa, José Alexandre S., Hallak, Jaime E.C.·2016·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Serotonergic hallucinogens produce alterations of perceptions, mood, and cognition, and have anxiolytic, antidepressant, and antiaddictive properties. These drugs act as agonists of frontocortical 5-HT 2A receptors, but the neural basis of their effects are not well understood. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of neuroimaging studies analyzing the effects of serotonergic hallucinogens in man. Studies published in the PubMed, Lilacs, and SciELO databases until 12 April 2016 were included using the following keywords: "ayahuasca", "DMT", "psilocybin", "LSD", "mescaline" crossed one by one with the terms "mri", "fmri", "pet", "spect", "imaging" and "neuroimaging". Of 279 studies identified, 25 were included. Acute effects included excitation of frontolateral/frontomedial cortex, medial temporal lobe, and occipital cortex, and inhibition of the default mode network. Long-term use was associated with thinning of the posterior cingulate cortex, thickening of the anterior cingulate cortex, and decreased neocortical 5-HT 2A receptor binding. Despite the high methodological heterogeneity and the small sample sizes, the results suggest that hallucinogens increase introspection and positive mood by modulating brain activity in the fronto-temporo-parieto-occipital cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.026

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
dos Santos, R. G., Osório, F. L., Crippa, J. A. S., & Hallak, J. E. C.
Affiliations
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
71
Pages
715-728
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2546678366
Cited by
107
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil (1502848-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
neuroimaging, brain activity, self-reflection, positive mood, receptor binding, methodological heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Psilocybin, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review