Cited by 219Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Neurometabolic Effects of Psilocybin, 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) and d-Methamphetamine in Healthy Volunteers A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled PET Study with [18F]FDG

Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E·1999·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The neurometabolic effects of the hallucinogen psilocybin (PSI; 0.2 mg/kg), the entactogen 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE; 2 mg/kg) and the stimulant d-methamphetamine (METH; 0.2-0.4 mg/kg) and the drugs' interactions with a prefrontal activation task were investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled human [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucoseFDG-positron emission tomographicPET study (each group: n = 8). Subjects underwent two scans (control: word repetition; activation word association) within 2-4 weeks. Psilocybin increased rMRGlu in distinct right hemispheric frontotemporal cortical regions, particularly in the anterior cingulate and decreased rMRGlu in the thalamus. Both MDE and METH induced cortical hypometabolism and cerebellar hypermetabolism. In the MDE group, cortical hypometabolism was more pronounced in frontal regions, with the exception of the right anterior cingulate, which tended to be hyperactive. Cognitive activation-related increases in left frontocortical regions were attenuated under all three psychoactive substances, but less so under MDE. Taking into account performance data and subjective reports on task difficulty, these effects may result from different mechanisms across the three groups. Our PSI data are in line with studies on acute schizophrenic patients suggesting frontal overactivity at rest, but diminished capacity to activate prefrontal regions upon cognitive demand. The MDE data support the hypothesis that entactogens constitute a distinct psychoactive substance class, which takes an intermediate position between stimulants and hallucinogens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00089-x

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Next-generation psychoplastogenic antidepressants modulate PFC function, with both ketamine and psychedelics increasing PFC activation as measured by 18F-FDG PET imaging.

    “Next-generation, psychoplastogenic antidepressants also modulate PFC function with both ketamine and psychedelics increasing PFC activation as measured by 18F-FDG PET imaging (113–116).”
  • In another human PET study, psilocybin (0.2 mg/kg, p.o.) provoked 5-10% increases in CMRglc in frontal operculum, anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior temporal cortex, along with 5-10% decreases in precentral cortex and thalamus relative to a control group.

    “Relative to a control group, the treatment provoked 5–10% increases in CMRglc in frontal operculum, anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior temporal cortex, along with 5–10% decreases in the precentral cortex and thalamus in a study by Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al. [138].”
  • Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al. saw greater effects in the right hemisphere, whereas Vollenweider et al. reported symmetrical changes in CMRglc.

    “Whereas Vollenweider et al. [137] reported symmetrical changes in CMRglc, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al. [138] saw greater effects in the right hemisphere.”
  • There was relatively little overlap between the patterns of altered CMRglc in subjects receiving psilocybin versus the non-hallucinogenic indirect serotonin/dopamine agonist MDMA.

    “There was relatively little overlap between the patterns of altered CMRglc in subjects receiving psilocybin (2) versus the non-hallucinogenic indirect serotonin/dopamine agonist methylendioxymetamphetamine (MDMA).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
1999-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
565-581
ISSN
0893-133X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102963347
Cited by
219
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • RWTH Aachen University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
psilocybin, MDMA, hallucinogens, entactogens, stimulants, brain glucose metabolism, 18F-FDG PET, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, cerebellar hypermetabolism, cognitive activation, word association task, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebellum, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glucose, Hallucinogens, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Psilocybin, Psychopathology, Radionuclide Imaging, 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, Adrenergic Agents, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review