Cited by 111Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major Depression

Therapeutic use of serotoninergic hallucinogens: A review of the evidence and of the biological and psychological mechanisms

dos Santos, Rafael Guimarães, Hallak, Jaime Eduardo Cecilio·2020·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Serotoninergic hallucinogens include drugs such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and psilocybin. Recent trials with single/few doses of these compounds show that they induce rapid and sustained antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects. These effects are also observed in religious groups using the DMT-containing brew ayahuasca. The agonist action of these substances on 5-HT 2A receptors expressed in frontal and limbic areas increase glutamatergic transmission and neuroplasticity. These neurochemical effects are associated with acute alterations on self-perception and increases in introspection and positive mood, and with subacute and long-term decreases in psychiatric symptoms, increases in some personality traits such as openness, improvements in emotional processing, and increases in empathy. These are preliminary but promising results that should be further explored in controlled trials with larger sample sizes, especially considering that these compounds could be beneficial in the treatment of treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.001

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, reviews have focused on establishing treatment efficacy, understanding neurological mechanisms of change, or have been broad in their aims.

    “To date, reviews have focused on establishing treatment efficacy [30], understanding the neurological mechanisms of change [71], or have been broad in their aims (e.g. including a variety of drug classes or disorders [72, 73];).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
dos Santos, R. G., & Hallak, J. E. C.
Affiliations
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
108
Pages
423-434
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992322507
Cited by
111
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
LSD, DMT, psilocybin, ayahuasca, 5-HT2A receptor agonism, antidepressant effects, anxiolytic effects, neuroplasticity, glutamatergic neurotransmission, self-perception, self-reflection, positive mood, personality traits, empathy, emotional processing, treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders, psychedelic therapy
MeSH terms
Social Cognition, Exploratory Behavior, Hallucinogens, Humans, Limbic System, Neuronal Plasticity, Prefrontal Cortex, Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review