The DOI matches its Crossref record; 336 of the 361 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 175 of the 418 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder
Open accessAbstract
International consensus review of large studies and meta-analyses on ADHD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
120 No full text of the sources · 78 Supported · 69 Sources not found · 68 Partly supported · 20 Own interpretation · 7 Not checked yet · 5 Supported so far · 3 No basis given · 2 Mixed support · 1 Not supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found that ADHD was associated with a more than twofold greater odds of alcohol-use disorders (13 studies, over 20,000 participants) and nicotine-related disorder (14 studies, over 1,800 participants) (Groenman et al., 2017).”
- Also stated in: § Substance Use Disorders · plain
“A meta-analysis found that ADHD was associated with a more than twofold greater odds of alcohol-use disorders (13 studies, over 20,000 participants) and nicotine-related disorder (14 studies, over 1,800 participants)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Substance Use Disorders
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Groenman et al., 2017 source
The Externalizing Disorders section reports odds ratios of 2.15 for alcohol-related disorder and 2.52 for nicotine-related disorder among individuals with ADHD. Table 2 lists 13 alcohol studies and 14 nicotine studies; Table 1’s included-study sample sizes are consistent with the cited participant thresholds. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelationaln = 20,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Substance Use Disorders · plain
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The clinical significance of the signs and symptoms of the disorder has been recognized for over two centuries.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > A Brief History: ADHD is not a New Disorder
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lange et al., 2010 source
The Introduction says that children with inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity were described during the preceding 200 years, and the Crichton section identifies a physician's account from 1798 as an early example resembling ADHD. Together, these support clinical recognition of the symptoms for over two centuries, without implying that the modern ADHD diagnosis existed then. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Taylor, 2011 source
- Not matchedcites Weikard, 1799
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For most people with ADHD, many genetic and environmental risk factors accumulate to cause the disorder”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Faraone et al., 2015 source
The Summary says most ADHD cases arise from a pool of genetic and environmental risk factors, with cumulative vulnerability contributing to the disorder. The opening section likewise states that several such factors act together to increase susceptibility in most cases. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis, with 135 studies and about a quarter of a million youths, found no significant differences in prevalence between North America and Europe, Asia, Africa, South America, and Oceania”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Polanczyk et al., 2014 source
The discussion (indexed under “Abstract > 13.01 (1)”; page unavailable) says North American ADHD prevalence estimates did not differ significantly from those for Europe, Oceania, South America, Asia or Africa. The paper also reports that its multivariate analysis included 135 studies. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of six studies with over 5,300 participants estimated the prevalence of ADHD in adulthood to be 2.5%”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Simon et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report a pooled adult ADHD prevalence of 2.5% (95% CI 2.1–3.1). The Abstract says six studies were omitted from 12 identified studies, consistent with six in the analysis, but the passages available from our copy do not substantiate the citing sentence’s figure of over 5,300 participants. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedn = 5,300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“ADHD occurs throughout the developed and developing world and is more common in males compared with females.”
- Also stated in: § How Common is ADHD? · plain
“ADHD is more common in males.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willcutt, 2012 source
The Gender Differences section states that males were more likely than females to meet criteria for ADHD across all diagnostic algorithms. This directly supports the attributed claim; page numbers were not supplied in the passages. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § How Common is ADHD? · plain
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It has not become more common over the past three decades”
- Also stated in: § How Common is ADHD? · plain
“The latter meta-analysis found no increase in the prevalence of ADHD in children and adolescents over the past three decades”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Polanczyk et al., 2014 source
The Abstract concludes that, across three decades, there was no evidence of an increase in children in the community meeting ADHD criteria when standardized diagnostic procedures were used. The paper distinguishes this from rising rates of diagnosis and treatment. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § How Common is ADHD? · plain
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Black individuals are at higher risk for ADHD diagnoses than the general US population.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Cénat et al., 2020 source
The Conclusions and Relevance section explicitly states that the meta-analysis suggests Black individuals are at higher risk for ADHD diagnoses than the general US population. The Discussion also reports a higher pooled prevalence among Black individuals than rates reported in reviews of general populations. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 19 studies encompassing over 150,000 U.S. Black youths under 18 years old reported an ADHD prevalence rate of 14 percent.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Cénat et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report a pooled ADHD prevalence of 13.87% for 19 studies assessing Black people younger than 18, which rounds to 14%. However, the reported total of 154,818 participants covers all 21 studies, including adult samples; it does not establish that the 19-study youth analysis encompassed over 150,000 participants. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“ADHD occurs throughout the developed and developing world”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Polanczyk et al., 2014 source
The paper’s discussion (indexed as Abstract > 13.01 (1); page unavailable) reports ADHD prevalence estimates from North America, Europe, Oceania, South America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East. That geographic coverage supports the claim that ADHD occurs in both developed and developing parts of the world. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
- It may state two separate claims as one. 125
- The quote only partly states this claim. 12
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A population-based birth cohort study of over 5,700 children found no significant differences among children with high, average, or low IQ and ADHD in median age at which ADHD criteria were met, rates of learning disorders, psychiatric disorders, and substance abuse, and rates of stimulant treatment”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Katusic et al., 2011 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Disputedcites Rommelse et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plainn = 5,700- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“it disappears after adjusting for family history of ADHD which indicates that the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and ADHD is due to familial or genetic factors that increase the risk for both smoking and ADHD”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
What the sources say
- Disputedcites Joelsson et al., 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Table 4; page unavailable) report that the maternal-smoking association remained significant after adjustment for maternal and paternal psychiatric history: the adjusted odds ratio for ADHD without comorbidities was 1.59 (95% CI 1.43–1.77). The paper does not report a separate adjustment specifically for family history of ADHD, but its adjusted findings contradict the claim that the association disappeared. The Background discusses familial confounding as a possibility, not an established explanation for the association. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Obel et al., 2016 source
- Partly supportedcites Skoglund et al., 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that the smoking–ADHD association disappeared in sibling comparisons, supporting familial confounding. But the Methods list no adjustment for family history of ADHD, and the association remained significant after adjustment for measured covariates. The paper therefore does not show that adjusting for ADHD family history specifically removes it, or establish that genetic factors are the cause. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Disputed
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Comparative meta-analyses show that structural grey matter volume reductions in basal ganglia and insula are disorder-specific relative to OCD in 30 data sets with 1,870 participants (Norman et al., 2016) while medial frontal reductions were specific to ASD in 66 data sets with 3,610 participants (Lukito et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Norman et al., 2016 source
- Disputedcites Lukito et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Disorder-Differentiating and Shared Brain Structure Abnormalities; page unavailable) report medial frontal grey-matter reduction in ASD relative to controls, but identify medial prefrontal reduction as ADHD-differentiating relative to ASD, particularly in pediatric participants. They therefore do not support calling the structural reduction ASD-specific. The sample-characteristics Results also report 86 structural datasets, not 66. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plaincorrelationaln = 1,870- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ADHD can only be diagnosed by a licensed clinician who interviews the parent or caregiver and/or patient to document criteria for the disorder”
- Also stated in: § How is ADHD diagnosed? · plain
“It cannot be diagnosed by rating scales alone, neuropsychological tests, or methods for imaging the brain.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites American Psychiatric Association, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Faraone et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Children and adolescents section calls a detailed clinical interview the diagnostic 'gold standard' and says diagnosticians assess symptoms, onset and impairment, using reports from patients or informants. The Adults section likewise describes an interview with the patient and, when available, informant reports. The paper does not state that only a licensed clinician may make the diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not matchedcites World Health Organization, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § How is ADHD diagnosed? · plain
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Meta-analyses indicate that inattention is more strongly associated with academic impairment, low self-esteem, negative occupational outcomes and lower overall adaptive functioning.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Willcutt et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Functional impairment > Symptom dimensions passage reports stronger associations for inattention than hyperactivity-impulsivity with academic impairment across ages and impaired adaptive functioning in children and adolescents. It does not report stronger associations with low self-esteem or negative occupational outcomes, and its adaptive-functioning finding is not stated for adults. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of nine studies with a total of over 32,000 older adults found a prevalence of 2.2% based on ADHD rating scales, dropping to 1.5% when limited to persons at least fifty years old.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Dobrosavljevic et al., 2020 source
Section 3.1 reports nine research-diagnosis studies with 32,766 participants. Table 2 reports a pooled prevalence of 2.18% across those studies’ datasets and 1.49% in the sensitivity analysis limited to an age cutoff of 50 or older, matching the cited figures when rounded. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelationaln = 32,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A review of 37 twin studies from the United States, Europe, Scandinavia, and Australia found that genes and their interaction with the environment must play a substantial role in causing ADHD”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Faraone and Larsson, 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Evidence for Heritability from family, adoption and twin studies' section reports a mean heritability of 74% across 37 twin studies, supporting a substantial genetic role. The 'Conclusions and Future Directions' section says gene–environment interactions are possible and may account for much of ADHD’s etiology, not that they must play a substantial role. The retrieved passages do not establish the stated geographic range of the 37 studies; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not matchedcites Larsson et al., 2014a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Pettersson et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports high heritability estimates for ADHD, supporting a substantial genetic contribution. But the Introduction describes this as an analysis of sibling and genetic data, not a review of 37 twin studies; the Discussion also says empirical evidence for gene–environment interaction remains limited, rather than establishing a substantial causal role for it in ADHD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In rare cases, however, ADHD-like symptoms can be caused by extreme deprivation early in life (Kennedy et al., 2016), a single genetic abnormality (Faraone and Larsson, 2018), or traumatic brain injury early in life (Stojanovski et al., 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Kennedy et al., 2016 source
The Kennedy et al. citation attaches to the early-deprivation part of the sentence, not the genetic or brain-injury examples. The Discussion describes a persistent ADHD variant in people exposed to severe institutional deprivation early in childhood, and the Key points say adverse long-term outcomes occur in a substantial minority of cases. The Introduction also describes this as evidence for a social/environmental pathway to ADHD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites Faraone and Larsson, 2018 source
Only the single-genetic-abnormality clause is attributed to Faraone and Larsson. In “The Search for Rare Genetic Variants” (page unavailable), the review describes a chromosome 3 inversion that co-segregated with ADHD symptoms in one family and implicated SLC9A9; it also reports an association between mutations of that gene and ADHD. The other two causes in the sentence have separate citations and are not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites Stojanovski et al., 2019 source
The Introduction describes attention problems and disinhibited behavior as common sequelae of TBI in youth and reports that some children develop ADHD symptoms after injury. The Discussion adds that the physical insult from TBI may contribute to post-injury ADHD symptoms, supporting the cited clause's cautious causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Many large epidemiologic and clinical studies show that ADHD often co-occurs with other psychiatric disorders, especially depression, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, eating disorders, and substance use disorders”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bernardi et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Lifetime and 12-month comorbidity, Table 2) report frequent psychiatric comorbidity with ADHD, and the Discussion specifically identifies bipolar disorder and anxiety disorders. The Discussion also discusses substance use disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and an association with eating disorders reported by prior research; however, this study did not assess eating disorders, and the passages do not establish the claimed co-occurrence with autism spectrum disorders. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2018c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Groenman et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion under Figure 2 explicitly describes ODD and conduct disorder as comorbid with childhood ADHD. The Externalizing Disorders section reports an increased risk of later substance use disorders, not their co-occurrence with ADHD. The paper does not establish frequent co-occurrence with the other listed conditions or document the claimed breadth of epidemiologic and clinical evidence; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“ADHD impairs the functioning of highly intelligent people, so the disorder can be diagnosed in this group.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Katusic et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion says ADHD puts children with high IQ at risk for psychosocial outcomes and stresses the importance of diagnosing them. This supports the claim for children, but the study does not establish it for highly intelligent people of all ages. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites Rommelse et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page not available) report that attention problems predicted functional impairment at school even in the higher-IQ range, and the Conclusions say such problems warrant clinical concern. The study assessed ADHD-related symptoms in children, not clinical ADHD diagnoses, so it does not directly establish the sentence’s diagnostic conclusion or its application to highly intelligent people generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Hyperactive-impulsive symptoms are associated with peer rejection, aggression, risky driving behaviors and accidental injuries.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Willcutt et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Functional impairment > Symptom dimensions passage (page not provided) reports associations between hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms and overt peer rejection, relational aggression, and more frequent accidental injuries. It does not report an association with risky driving behaviors; a search for driving found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“although due to increased recognition by clinicians, the disorder is more likely to be diagnosed today than in prior decades.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rydell et al., 2018 source
- Partly supportedcites Song et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased ADHD case identification from 2007 to 2011 and suggests that greater awareness of how ADHD manifests in girls may explain part of that increase. It does not establish that improved clinician recognition generally caused ADHD to be more likely diagnosed today than in prior decades. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Xu et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“large studies from the US and Sweden indicate that ADHD is more likely to have been diagnosed in recent years, which reflects changes in administrative and clinical practices”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rydell et al., 2018 source
- Partly supportedcites Song et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports rising ADHD identification among U.S. children from 2007 to 2011. The paper does not report a Swedish study, and its Discussion (page unavailable) argues against relaxed clinical diagnostic standards as the explanation for the increase during that period; it does not establish a change in administrative practice as the cause. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites Xu et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis, covering 20 studies with a combined total of 794 individuals, found a very small increase in ADHD symptoms, but only when rated by parents, not by teachers or other observers”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Nigg et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Synthetic Food Additives, Parent Reports) report 20 studies with 794 participants and a small parent-rated effect (g = 0.18). The Teacher/Observer Reports section finds no significant effect when those reports are pooled, but does find a reliable effect in studies confined to food colors. Thus, “only” parent ratings overstates the finding, and the 794 participants are the parent-report sample. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirectn = 794- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Very large studies of families suggest that ADHD shares genetic or familial causes with autoimmune diseases (Li et al., 2019), hypospadias (Butwicka et al., 2015), and intellectual disability (Faraone and Larsson, 2018).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Butwicka et al., 2015 source
- Supportedcites Faraone and Larsson, 2018 source
The “ADHD’s Clinical Features & Course” section reports that people with intellectual disability and their relatives had increased ADHD risk. It also says genetic factors accounted for 91% of the correlation between ADHD and intellectual-disability liabilities, supporting the portion attributed to Faraone and Larsson. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The polygenic risk for ADHD predicts ADHD symptoms in the population suggesting that the genetic causes of ADHD as a disorder, also influence lower levels of ADHD symptoms in the population”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Demontis et al., 2019 source
The Discussion states that polygenic risk for ADHD has been associated with inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive traits below clinical thresholds in the population. It also reports genetic concordance between ADHD and population-level ADHD-related traits, supporting the sentence’s suggested overlap in genetic causes. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites Taylor et al., 2019 source
The Results (PRS Analyses; page not provided) report that ADHD polygenic risk scores were associated with ADHD traits and that the association remained significant after excluding individuals diagnosed with ADHD. The Discussion (page not provided) interprets the findings as evidence that genetic risks for psychiatric disorders are shared with milder symptom levels in the population. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They identified many genetic risk variants, each having a small effect on the risk for the disorder”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Demontis et al., 2019 source
The Results section reports 304 significant genetic variants across 12 ADHD risk loci. The Discussion describes the risk-increasing effects of the index variants at those loci as modest, with odds ratios of 1.077–1.198. The claim is a fair paraphrase of those findings. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“ADHD can also be the result of rare single gene defects (Faraone and Larsson, 2018) or abnormalities of the chromosomes (Cederlof et al., 2014).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Faraone and Larsson, 2018 source
The Conclusions and Future Directions section states that, in rare cases, a single genetic defect may lead to ADHD. The chromosomal-abnormalities clause in the citing sentence is attributed to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cederlof et al., 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the population, those with a high polygenic risk for ADHD are more likely to have been diagnosed with ADHD (Li, 2019), anxiety or depression (Martin et al., 2018).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Martin et al., 2018 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) states that higher ADHD polygenic risk scores were associated with increased risk of anxiety and depression in children from the general population. The citation to Martin et al. supports the anxiety-or-depression portion of the sentence; the ADHD-diagnosis portion is cited to Li (2019). (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The polygenic risk for ADHD is associated with general psychopathology (Brikell et al., 2020) and several psychiatric disorders (Lee PH, 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Genetic Causes of ADHD
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Brikell et al., 2020 source
The Results (General factor model; page not provided) report that higher ADHD polygenic risk scores were significantly associated with the general childhood psychopathology factor. The separate claim about several psychiatric disorders is attributed to Lee PH (2019), not to Brikell et al. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not matchedcites Lee PH, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A countrywide population study using Danish national registers looked at over 630,000 youths and found dose-response relationships between lower parental educational attainment, parental unemployment, and parental relative poverty and higher risk of ADHD in offspring. Combinations of social disadvantages had cumulative risks.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Deprivation, Stress, Infection, Poverty and Trauma
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Keilow et al., 2020 source
The Study setting and sample section reports Danish national-register data for more than 630,000 children. The Results section explicitly describes dose-response relationships for all three parental disadvantages and reports increased ADHD risk for combinations of them. The paper describes these as associations, as does the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A Danish national register longitudinal cohort study of a million people found that Rutter’s indicators of adversity were predictive of ADHD. Out-of-home care was strongly predictive; low social class, paternal criminality, maternal mental disorder, and severe marital discord were moderately predictive. Large family size had no effect (Ostergaard et al., 2016).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Deprivation, Stress, Infection, Poverty and Trauma
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ostergaard et al., 2016 source
The Methods describe a Danish register-based cohort of 994,407 children. The Results show elevated ADHD hazard ratios for low social class, severe marital discord, paternal criminality, and maternal mental disorder; the Discussion identifies out-of-home care as the strongest predictor and says large family size was not significantly associated with ADHD. Thus, “no effect” is supported as a report of no statistically significant association, not proof of zero effect. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with preschoolers found that cognitive training led to moderate improvement in working memory (23 studies, over 2,000 participants) and small-to-moderate improvement in inhibitory control (26 studies, over 2,200 participants) (Pauli-Pott et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Pauli-Pott et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Table 3 (Results > Working memory; page not provided) reports improvement in working memory across 23 studies (d = 0.46) and in cool inhibitory control across 26 studies (d = 0.30), supporting the stated effect sizes. The ADHD/ODD subgroup results come from only five and four studies, respectively, so the 23- and 26-study findings should not be presented as findings specifically for preschoolers with ADHD. The cited Results passages do not establish the stated participant totals of over 2,000 and over 2,200. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirectn = 2,200- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 36 cohorts with a total of over 4,100 participants found slightly reduced total cortical surface area in children with ADHD. The same team found some subcortical regions of the brain were smaller in children with ADHD, mainly in frontal, cingulate and temporal regions with some reductions in cortical thickness in temporal regions”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Hoogman et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Effect of age; page unavailable) report smaller subcortical volumes in children with ADHD and no significant case–control differences in adults, but they do report a significant hippocampal difference in adolescents. The Methods (Contributing studies and Neuroimaging; page unavailable) describe 23 cohorts and measurements of subcortical volumes, not the claimed 36 cohorts, total cortical surface area, or cortical thickness. The reported effect sizes are small, but this source does not support the cortical findings attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites Hoogman et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report slightly smaller total cortical surface area in children with ADHD, especially in frontal, cingulate, and temporal regions, and no significant cortical differences in adolescents or adults. The Discussion describes the effects as small. But the cited paper identifies those regions as cortical, not subcortical; its Introduction only refers to an earlier study of subcortical volumes whose differences were largely restricted to childhood. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelationaln = 4,100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A pair of meta-analyses found no difference in serum iron levels in youths with ADHD (six studies, 617 participants) but small-to-moderate reductions in serum ferritin, a protein that stores iron (ten studies, over 2,100 participants)”
- Also stated in: § Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Nutrient Deficiencies · plain
“Another pair of meta-analyses likewise found no difference in serum iron levels (six studies, over 1,700 participants) but small-to-moderate reductions in serum ferritin (12 studies, over 6,000 participants)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Nutrient Deficiencies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Wang et al., 2017 source
The Abstract Results report six serum-iron studies (617 participants) with no association with ADHD, and ten serum-ferritin studies (2,191 participants) with lower levels in ADHD cases. The ferritin effect size (SMD −0.40) supports the description of a small-to-moderate reduction. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Partly supportedcites Tseng et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (pages not provided) report no statistically significant serum-iron difference in the main analysis and lower serum ferritin in children with ADHD (Hedges’ g = −0.246). The study and participant counts in the citing sentence do not match this paper’s analyses: it reports 9 iron datasets with 1,788 children and 19 ferritin datasets with 6,251 children. Its iron finding also became significant after one study was removed in a sensitivity analysis. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainn = 2,100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Nutrient Deficiencies · plain
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found that compared with typically developing people, children and adolescents with unmedicated ADHD were about 20% more likely to be overweight or obese (15 studies, over 400,000 participants), and adults with unmedicated ADHD almost 50% more likely to be overweight or obese (9 studies, over 45,000 participants) (Nigg et al., 2016). Meta-analyses of twelve studies with over 180,0”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Obesity
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Nigg et al., 2016 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Meta-analysis Results (page unavailable) report higher odds of overweight/obesity with ADHD, an association larger in adults than in children, and an odds ratio of 1.30 in studies controlling for stimulant medication. They do not establish the quoted age-specific percentages or study counts for unmedicated people, a 40% obesity figure, or that medicated people with ADHD are indistinguishable from controls. The paper instead describes medication-controlled analyses as its best estimate of risk in untreated individuals. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not matchedcites Cortese et al., 2016b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 400,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 48 cohorts with a total of over 12,000 participants showed that ADHD participants had smaller hippocampus volume relative to OCD which was related to IQ differences and smaller intracranial volume relative to ASD and OCD patients (Boedhoe et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Boedhoe et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Disease-specific subcortical and cortical differences) report smaller hippocampal volume in children with ADHD than in children with OCD, and smaller intracranial volume in children and adolescents with ADHD than in those with ASD or OCD. The Discussion says IQ differences may explain the hippocampal finding; it does not establish that relationship. The citing sentence omits the age limits and says 48 cohorts, whereas the Methods report 151 cohorts. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaincorrelationaln = 12,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Meta-analyses and systematic reviews showed that the medications used to treat ADHD are not associated with observed deficits in brain structure (Hoogman et al., 2017; Hoogman et al., 2019; Lukito et al., 2020; Norman et al., 2016; Spencer et al., 2013), but with improved brain function, most prominently in inferior frontal and striatal regions (Hart et al., 2013; Lukito et al., 2020; Norman et al”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Hoogman et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Effect of medication) found no subcortical volume differences between participants with ADHD who had and had not used stimulant medication, and the Discussion says the observed brain differences were not attributable to medication effects. This supports the structural part of the citation, but the study examined stimulant use and measured brain volumes, not all ADHD medications or all structural deficits; the Discussion also cautions that its cross-sectional design was not optimal for testing medication effects. The claim about improved brain function is attached to other citations, not this one. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites Hoogman et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no significant association between psychostimulant medication and cortical dimensions, supporting the structural part of the citation. It cautions against firm conclusions because the study was observational, and the Results note nominally lower frontal surface area among current stimulant users. This source therefore does not establish the broader claim that ADHD medications are not associated with brain-structure deficits; the brain-function clause is attributed to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites Lukito et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (ADHD VBM and ADHD fMRI; page unavailable) associate current or lifetime psychostimulant exposure with increased orbitofrontal gray-matter volume and lifetime exposure with greater left inferior frontal activation. They do not report medication-associated improvement in striatal function. The findings concern psychostimulant exposure, rather than all ADHD medications, and are associations rather than demonstrated treatment effects. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A population-based cohort study of over 900,000 Danish children found that epilepsy was associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk for ADHD (Bertelsen et al., 2016). Another population-based cohort study, of over 12,000 Taiwanese, reported that epilepsy was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk for ADHD. Conversely, a linked cohort study of over 18,000 Taiwanese found ADHD was associated with a”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bertelsen et al., 2016 source
- Supportedcites Chou et al., 2013 source
The Abstract Results report an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.54 for subsequent ADHD in the epilepsy cohort and 3.94 for subsequent epilepsy in the ADHD cohort. The Abstract Methods identify both as Taiwanese population-based cohorts with the stated approximate sizes. The 2.7-fold Danish finding and family-risk findings are not attributed to this source in the supplied citing text. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Brikell et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report an approximately 3.5-fold association between epilepsy and ADHD, risk differences across relatives, and genetic and environmental contributions. The Introduction reports a fourfold epilepsy risk among people with ADHD as a previous finding. This paper does not report the claimed 2.7-fold or 2.5-fold estimates as its own findings; the supplied citing sentence attributes the 2.7-fold estimate to Bertelsen et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 21 functional MRI studies with 607 participants found that those with ADHD showed consistent and replicable under-activation in typical regions of inhibitory control such as right inferior frontal cortex, supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia relative to typically developing individuals (Hart et al., 2013). The inferior frontal under-activation findings were replicated”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hart et al., 2013 source
- Partly supportedcites Lukito et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports prior meta-analyses finding ADHD-related underactivation in right inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area and striatum during cognitive control. This paper’s Results replicate right inferior frontal and caudate underactivation during motor response inhibition, but report supplementary motor area underactivation only for the broader cognitive-control analysis, not inhibition specifically. The 21-study sample cited in the printed sentence is attributed to Hart et al. (2013), not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Norman et al., 2016 source
boostedcorrelationaln = 607- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In a Norwegian national registry study of over 1.2 million males and over 1.2 million females, males with ADHD were 30% more likely to be diagnosed with psoriasis, and women with ADHD more than 50% more likely to be diagnosed with psoriasis, than normally developing controls (Hegvik et al., 2018).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Hegvik et al., 2018 source
The Results (Primary analyses) report adjusted odds of psoriasis of 1.31 for males with ADHD and 1.57 for females with ADHD, compared with those without ADHD. The Results (Demographics) list 1,219,669 females in a cohort of 2,500,118, leaving over 1.2 million males. The percentages describe higher adjusted odds, rather than a directly measured increase in probability. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The functional under-activations in right inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia during tasks of cognitive control were disorder-specific relative to OCD in 1,870 participants (Norman et al., 2016), while the inferior frontal dysfunction was specific relative to autism in 3,610 participants (Lukito et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Norman et al., 2016 source
- Partly supportedcites Lukito et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Disorder-Differentiating and Shared Brain Abnormalities during Cognitive Control) report ADHD-differentiating right inferior frontal underactivation relative to ASD specifically during motor response inhibition. But the Results (Search Results and Sample Characteristics) list 2,693 participants across the cognitive-control fMRI datasets, not 3,610. The OCD comparison belongs to the separately cited Norman et al. (2016), rather than the part attributed to Lukito et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelationaln = 1,870- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis including 130 fMRI studies with 1,914 participants found no convergence except for aberrant function in basal ganglia for neutral fMRI tasks and inferior frontal under-function in males only (Samea et al., 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Samea et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 96 studies (68 task-fMRI, 6 resting-state fMRI and 22 structural), yielding 130 individual experiments across 1,914 unique subjects—not 130 fMRI studies. The Conclusion supports the reported lack of general convergence and the two subgroup findings: left pallidum/putamen dysfunction with neutral-stimulus tasks and decreased left inferior frontal activity in males. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plainn = 1,914- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A study of over 36,000 people from the US reported that ADHD increased the risks for problem gambling, spending too much money, reckless driving, and quitting a job without a plan for what to do next”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Other
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bernardi et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Impulsive behaviors and number of traumas, Table 3) report higher odds of gambling or overspending problems, reckless driving, and quitting a job without knowing what to do next among adults with ADHD. However, the Method states that 34,653 respondents were re-interviewed, not over 36,000. The paper reports associations rather than establishing that ADHD caused these behaviors. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirectn = 36,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using nationwide registers in Denmark, a cohort study of 2.9 million people reported a fourfold higher rate of suicide attempts and deaths in patients with ADHD. The risk was over tenfold in those with ADHD plus another psychiatric diagnosis”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Fitzgerald et al., 2019 source
The Abstract reports a Danish nationwide register cohort of 2.9 million people and defines suicidal behaviour as suicide attempts and deaths by suicide. It reports a 4.7-fold higher rate for people with ADHD and a 10.4-fold higher rate for those with ADHD and a comorbid psychiatric disorder, consistent with the citing sentence’s approximate figures. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis comprising 21 studies and over 19,500 prison inmates found that the prevalence of ADHD in prisons based on interview diagnoses was 20.5% with no differences observed between males and females or adolescents and adults”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Crime and Delinquency
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Young et al., 2015 source
The Results > Prevalence section reports an observed ADHD prevalence of 20.5% among 19,575 inmates across 21 studies using interview diagnoses. The same section reports no significant differences between males and females or between youths and adults. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of twelve studies covering over 5,400 people found that those with ADHD were almost three times more likely to be nicotine-dependent. Combining eleven studies with almost 2,400 participants, those with ADHD were 50% more likely to develop a drug or alcohol use disorder than those without ADHD”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Substance Use Disorders
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Lee et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelationaln = 5,400- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A nationwide cohort study of over 50,000 youths with ADHD and an equal number of age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched controls drawn from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database reported that having ADHD was associated with a more than three-quarters greater likelihood of burn injury.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Accidental Injuries
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Yeh et al., 2020 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A study using a nationally representative American sample of over 5,000 adults found that those with ADHD were over twice as likely to be perpetrators of physical dating violence, and 65% more likely to be victims of such violence”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Crime and Delinquency
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites McCauley et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Methods > Analysis reports a nationally representative US sample of 5,112 adults, and the Discussion says dating-violence risk was particularly high among those with ADHD. The Results discuss victimization and perpetration, but the passages in our copy do not establish the claimed ADHD-specific figures—over twice as likely to perpetrate and 65% more likely to be victimized. The study concerns dating violence before age 21, reported retrospectively by adults. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelationaln = 5,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A Swedish cohort study of over 25,000 ADHD patients found a one-third reduction in criminality among men receiving ADHD medication, and a 40% reduction for women”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lichtenstein et al., 2012 source
The Methods report a Swedish cohort of 25,656 people with ADHD. The Abstract Results report criminality rates 32% lower for men and 41% lower for women during medication periods than during non-medication periods—approximately one-third and 40%, respectively. These are associations from within-individual comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirectn = 25,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found dexmethylphenidate strongly reduced youth ADHD symptoms relative to placebo (seven studies, almost 1,500 participants), and had three times the clinical response rate (four studies, over 600 participants)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Maneeton et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Synthesis of results; page unavailable) report substantially improved ADHD rating-scale scores with dexmethylphenidate and a pooled clinical-response risk ratio of 3.10 versus placebo. The cited study counts and participant totals are not supported as stated: the Abstract (Results; page unavailable) says the entire review included 1,124 children and adolescents, fewer than the claimed almost 1,500 for the symptom analysis. (LLM, conf=0.91)
boosteddirectn = 1,500- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“German health insurance records, including over 25,000 patients with ADHD, indicate that patients with ADHD cost roughly €1,500 more annually than those without ADHD.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Libutzki et al., 2019 source
The Methods summary (p. 1) identifies 25,300 ADHD patients in German statutory health insurance claims. The Results (p. 1) report approximately €1,500 higher annual costs per ADHD patient and additional costs from comorbid conditions of up to €2,800; the Medical costs section (p. 3) gives the overall difference as €1,508. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedgedcorrelationaln = 25,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A nationwide longitudinal cohort study using the Swedish national registers found that among more than 38,000 individuals with ADHD, ADHD medication was associated with a greater than 40% reduction in the risk for depression three years later. The risk decreased with the duration of ADHD medication use. Depression was 20% less common when patients received ADHD medication compared with periods”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Chang et al., 2016 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelationaln = 38,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“During medicated periods both groups had a greater than 10% reduction in unintended injuries, and a greater than 70% reduction in traumatic brain injuries”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ghirardi et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A Swedish registry study of over 650,000 students found that treatment with ADHD medication for three months resulted in a more than nine-point gain in grade point sum (on a scale of 0 to 320); treatment was associated with an increase in the probability of completing upper secondary school by two-thirds”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jangmo et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (Method and Results) reports 657,720 Swedish students and an association between three months of ADHD medication and a 9.35-point higher grade point sum on a 0–320 scale. But the Results (Sensitivity analyses) reports an adjusted odds ratio of 0.89 for *not completing* upper secondary school, not a two-thirds increase in the probability of completing it. The registry study also reports an association, so “resulted in” overstates the evidence for a causal gain. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Their direct healthcare costs in the year following diagnosis averaged €4,000. Despite explicit German guidelines recommending ADHD medication, only a third were prescribed medication, dropping to one eighth four years later. Two-thirds received psychotherapy. The authors concluded that “guideline recommendations are not yet comprehensively implemented in everyday routine care””
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Libutzki et al., 2020 source
Split into 3 atoms — 3 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirectn = 2,380- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of nine RCTs comprising 1,463 patients found that discontinuing medications led to a worsening in quality of life for children and adolescents but not adults.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Tsujii et al., 2020 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirectn = 1,463- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A Swedish population-based study of 38,000 people with ADHD found a 20% decline in suicide related events among those prescribed stimulants during periods when they were under treatment as opposed to during periods when they were not under treatment. No such benefit was found for non-stimulant medications”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Chen et al., 2014 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirectn = 38,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Five medications for ADHD were associated with significantly worse anorexia (atomoxetine, d-amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil), four with insomnia (d-amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil), three with weight loss (atomoxetine, methylphenidate, modafinil), two each with abdominal pain (methylphenidate, guanfacine), discontinuation due to adverse event (”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Adverse Effects of ADHD Medications
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Solmi et al., 2020 source
The meta-review’s table (p. 12) lists QT prolongation among adverse effects significantly associated with guanfacine (Hedges’ g = 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.54). The paper describes its population as children and adolescents with mental disorders (p. 1). (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Five medications for ADHD were associated with significantly worse anorexia (atomoxetine, d-amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil), four with insomnia (d-amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil), three with weight loss (atomoxetine, methylphenidate, modafinil), two each with abdominal pain (methylphenidate, guanfacine), discontinuation due to adverse event (”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Adverse Effects of ADHD Medications
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Solmi et al., 2020 source
The Discussion (p. 14) states that sedation was observed with the alpha-2 agonists clonidine and guanfacine. The paper identifies itself as a meta-review of psychotropic-medication adverse effects in children and adolescents with mental disorders (p. 1). (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of methylphenidate treatment studies reported a 55% increase in adverse events relative to placebo, none life-threatening (11 studies, over 2,100 youths), but a fivefold increase in anorexia (3 studies, 613 youths), and more than fourfold increase in insomnia (4 studies, 749 youths) (Ching et al., 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Adverse Effects of ADHD Medications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ching et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Adverse Effects section reports that methylphenidate-treated participants were 1.55 times more likely than placebo recipients to experience adverse events; it also reports 5.11 times the risk of anorexia and 4.66 times the odds of insomnia. The Study section says no deaths were reported, but it does not establish that none of the adverse events were life-threatening; it notes that less common events were not examined. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It found moderate reductions in ADHD symptoms in both children and adolescents (6 RCTs, 240 participants) and adults (6 RCTs, 339 participants), but half the studies did not use active controls.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Zhang et al., 2018 source
The children/adolescents results section reports that meditation-based therapies reduced combined ADHD core symptoms more than control conditions, with a moderate effect size (Hedges’ g = −0.44). The provided copy does not give a page number. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelationaln = 240- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“It found moderate reductions in ADHD symptoms in both children and adolescents (6 RCTs, 240 participants) and adults (6 RCTs, 339 participants), but half the studies did not use active controls.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Zhang et al., 2018 source
The Discussion (Original article) reports that meditation-based therapies were more efficacious than control conditions for combined ADHD symptoms in adults, with a moderate mean effect size. The Abstract gives the adult estimate as Hedges’ g = −0.66 across six RCTs (n=339). (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelationaln = 339- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
In the paper
“a meta-analysis of 21 studies with over 1,600 participants showing that only about one in six youths with ADHD still meet full diagnostic criteria for ADHD at age 25, and about half show signs of residual impairment”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How Common is ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Faraone et al., 2006 source
plainn = 1,600- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In adolescence and young adulthood, many individuals with a history of childhood ADHD continue to be impaired by the disorder, although they often show reduced hyperactivity and impulsivity while retaining symptoms of inattention”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Faraone et al., 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found no significant effect of three classes of air pollutants –particulate matter (six studies, over 51,000 persons) and nitrogen oxides (five studies, over 51,000 persons)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zhang et al., 2020b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainn = 51,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A pair of meta-analyses found small correlations between lead burden and inattention symptoms (27 studies, over 9,300 youths) and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms (23 studies, over 7,800 youths)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Goodlad et al., 2013 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It found that spikes in nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and particulate matter were associated, respectively, with 47%, 27%, and 12% increases in ADHD related hospital admissions in succeeding days.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Park et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“correct misconceptions about the disorder that stigmatized affected people, reduced the credibility of health care providers, and prevented or delayed treatment of individuals challenged by the disorder”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Abstract > Background:
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
In the paper
“the diagnosis is useful for predicting a) additional problems the patient may have (e.g., difficulties learning in school); b) future patient outcomes (e.g., risk for future drug abuse); c) response to treatment (e.g., medications and psychological treatments); and d) features that indicate a consistent set of causes for the disorder”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > How is ADHD diagnosed?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Faraone, 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some have strong evidence for a causal role but, for most, the possibility remains that these associations are due to correlated genetic and environmental effects.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 37 studies with more than 2,300 participants found a small-to-moderate association between ADHD and risky decision-making (Dekkers et al., 2016). Another meta-analysis, combining 22 studies with 3,850 children and adolescents, found those with ADHD exhibited moderately greater impulsive decision-making overall on delay discounting and delay of gratification tasks (Patros et al.,”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
plaincorrelationaln = 2,300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These differences are not caused by drug treatment and, for some patients, diminish or change as patients grow out of the disorder.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 49 studies and over 8,200 children and adolescents found moderate impairments in working memory in those with ADHD. These deficits declined with age (Ramos et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ramos et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelationaln = 8,200- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A nationwide population-based cohort study using Swedish registers and covering more than two million children, 115,000 of them with ADHD, found that maternal preeclampsia during pregnancy is associated with a 15% greater subsequent likelihood of ADHD in offspring, rising to over 40% when the fetus is small for gestational age and exposed to preeclampsia. This pattern in families showed that it is”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Events During Pregnancy and Birth
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maher et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of two large cohort studies with a combined total of over 3.1 million persons found a slight but significant association between maternal hyperthyroidism during pregnancy and ADHD in offspring. A second meta-analysis of four cohort studies encompassing over 3.4 million participants likewise found a slight but significant association between maternal hypothyroidism and ADHD in”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Events During Pregnancy and Birth
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ge et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“It found that after adjusting for a wide range of possible confounders which turned out to have little effect, children of mothers with a single prior miscarriage were 9% more likely to develop ADHD than those of mothers without any miscarriage. Children of mothers with two or more prior miscarriages were 22% more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD. This upward exposure-response trend was”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Events During Pregnancy and Birth
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wang et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A Swedish national register study of 1.2 million children found a stepwise increase in the likelihood of ADHD with increasing prematurity. Results were not due to having an ADHD relative or socioeconomic stress (Lindstrom et al., 2011).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Events During Pregnancy and Birth
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lindstrom et al., 2011 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent meta-meta-analysis included 34 meta-analyses of neurocognitive profiles in ADHD (all ages) concerning 12 neurocognitive domains. Those with ADHD had moderate impairments in multiple domains (working memory, reaction time variability, response inhibition, intelligence/achievement, planning/organization). Effects were larger in children and adolescents than in adults (Pievsky and McGrath, 2”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pievsky and McGrath, 2018 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A Swedish national register cohort study of over 540,000 people found a dose-response relationship between cumulative indicators of adversity in the family and ADHD. A death in the family increased the subsequent likelihood of ADHD by 60%. Substantial parental substance abuse, criminality, or psychiatric disorder each more than doubled the likelihood as did residential instability and household”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Deprivation, Stress, Infection, Poverty and Trauma
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bjorkenstam et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis, spanning 21 studies with over 1,900 adults, concluded that ADHD-associated IQ deficits were small and not clinically meaningful (Bridgett and Walker, 2006).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bridgett and Walker, 2006 source
plaincorrelationaln = 1,900- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although many of these studies have found differences between groups of people who are and are not diagnosed with ADHD, the differences are typically small and do not dramatically differ between people with ADHD and those with other disorders. They are, therefore, not useful for diagnosing the disorder (Thome et al., 2012).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Thome et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A series of meta-analyses found that people with ADHD had small to moderate difficulties with abstract problem solving and working memory (12 studies, 952 persons), focused attention (22 studies, 1,493 persons), sustained attention (13 studies, 963 persons), and verbal memory (8 studies, 546 persons) (Schoechlin and Engel, 2005).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schoechlin and Engel, 2005 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study of over 80,000 mother-child pairs participating in the Danish National Birth Cohort reported an almost 50% elevated risk of ADHD in children of obese mothers and a doubled risk in children of severely obese mothers (Andersen et al., 2018).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Events During Pregnancy and Birth
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Andersen et al., 2018 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 137 studies with over 9,400 participants of all ages found ADHD to be associated with moderately lower IQ and reading scores and larger decreases in spelling and arithmetic scores (Frazier et al., 2004).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Performance Deficits in Psychological Processes
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Frazier et al., 2004 source
plaincorrelationaln = 9,400- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A Swedish national register study of over 2.5 million people found ADHD patients had a threefold greater risk of obesity relative to their non-ADHD siblings and cousins. It also found a familial co-aggregation of ADHD and clinical obesity, the strength of which varied directly with the degree of genetic relatedness (Chen et al., 2018c).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Obesity
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2018c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of nine studies with over 1,250 research participants found that elevations in the theta/beta on the electroencephalogram cannot be considered a reliable diagnostic measure for ADHD although it may have prognostic value in some patients (Arns et al., 2013).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What Have We Learned from Studying the Brains of People with ADHD? > Differences in the Brain Found by Neuroimaging Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Arns et al., 2013 source
plainn = 1,250- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a study of over 2.5 million German youth, those with ADHD were nine times more likely to have metabolic disorders, five times more likely to develop viral pneumonia, four times more likely to have white blood cell disorders, three times more likely to have kidney failure, high blood pressure, or be obese, two and a half times more likely to have type 2 diabetes or migraines, twice as likely to”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Akmatov et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“It found a subsequent 29% increased risk of ADHD in the celiac patients, rising to 39% when restricting to adult diagnoses of ADHD. However, when comparing 13,000 children diagnosed with celiac disease to their 18,000 non-celiac siblings, the increases became nonsignificant, suggesting the increases were primarily attributable to confounders (Lebwohl et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lebwohl et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelationaln = 13,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Young adults with ADHD were four times more likely to have somatic co-prescriptions and fifteen times more likely to have psychotropic co-prescriptions than normally developing controls. For middle-aged adults (30–49) the odds were six and 21 times greater, respectively, and for older adults, seven and 18 times greater.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Zhang et al., 2020a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A Danish national register cohort study of 1.1 million people found that hospitalization for serious infections was associated with a subsequent doubling in the rate of ADHD diagnosis. Among those treated with anti-infective agents, the risk of subsequent diagnosis with ADHD was halved (Kohler-Forsberg et al., 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kohler-Forsberg et al., 2019 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Using Taiwan’s nationwide population-based dataset, over 116,000 children with ADHD were compared with the same number of randomly selected children without ADHD. Those with ADHD were much more likely to have significant abnormalities of the eye: almost 90% more likely to have amblyopia (“lazy eye”), over 80% more likely to have astigmatism, and twice as likely to have heterotropia, in which the”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ho et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Su et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 116,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“A retrospective analysis of over 650,000 children and adolescents in German diagnosis and prescription databases found ADHD was 40% more likely to be diagnosed among children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (Kapellen et al., 2016).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Diabetes Mellitus:
What the sources say
plaincorrelationaln = 650,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“A Danish national register study of almost a million people found that children with autoimmune disease were 24% more likely to develop ADHD. Maternal autoimmune disease was associated with a 12% greater likelihood of ADHD in their offspring. Paternal autoimmune disease was not associated with any significant effect (Nielsen et al., 2017).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nielsen et al., 2017 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A Swedish national register study of over 1.5 million people found that those with asthma were 45% more likely to have ADHD even after adjustment for relevant variables (Cortese et al., 2018b). A cohort study of almost a million births using the Danish national registers found that children born to asthmatic mothers were 40% more likely to develop ADHD (Liu et al., 2019b).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Allergies and Asthma
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cortese et al., 2018b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Liu et al., 2019b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites van der Schans et al., 2017 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“A longitudinal study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database enrolled over 35,000 patients with ADHD and over 70,000 age- and sex-matched controls. Adolescents and young adults with ADHD were about three times more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (Chen et al., 2018b).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Diabetes Mellitus:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2018b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2018c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A Taiwan nationwide population cohort study of over 8,000 people with ADHD and 32,000 matched controls explored associations with autoimmune diseases. It reported that those with ADHD had well over twice the prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis, and autoimmune thyroid disease, and over 50% greater likelihood of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis (Chen et al., 2017”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2017a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelationaln = 8,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 18 studies with more than 2,500 children and adolescents found a moderate association between sleep-disordered breathing and ADHD (Sedky et al., 2014).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Other Somatic Disorders:
What the sources say
plaincorrelationaln = 2,500- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found that maternal pre-existing type 1 diabetes was associated with a small increased risk of ADHD in offspring (4 studies, over five million people). So was paternal pre-existing type 1 diabetes (3 studies, 4.7 million people), and maternal pre-existing type 2 diabetes (2 studies, 2.6 million people) (Zeng et al., 2019).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What kinds of Non-Psychiatric Medical Problems Commonly Occur among People with ADHD? > Diabetes Mellitus:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zeng et al., 2019 source
- Not matchedcites Ji et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found that persons with ADHD attempted suicide at twice the rate of typically developing people (six studies, over 65,000 persons), had over three times the rate of suicidal ideation (23 studies, over 70,000 persons), and over six times the rate of completed suicide (four studies, over 130,000 persons)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Septier et al., 2019 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A Taiwanese study of over 20,000 adolescents and young adults with ADHD and over 61,000 age- and sex-matched non-ADHD individuals found that those with ADHD were almost four times as likely to attempt suicide, and over six times as likely to repeat suicide attempts.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Huang et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 20,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In a prospective cohort study of more than 2.6 million Swedes, adults with ADHD had a small increase in premature death, mostly due to accidents and suicide. There was no significant association for children with ADHD”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sun et al., 2019b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis reported the prevalence of ADHD among adolescents in juvenile detention to be just over 17%, both for males (24 studies, over 24,000 individuals) and females (13 studies, over 3,900 individuals), which is much higher than the prevalence in the population”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Crime and Delinquency
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Beaudry et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 24,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Even while receiving medication, these children were more than three times as likely as typically developing peers to have low educational achievement, more than twice as likely to drop out of school before age 16, more than eight times as likely to have a record of special educational needs, 50% more likely to get injured, 40% more likely to be unemployed.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Educational Underachievement
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fleming et al., 2017 source
plaincorrelationaln = 750,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ADHD is a disorder associated with serious distress and/or impairments in living. Although, as documented below, many severe adverse outcomes have been associated with ADHD, the typical patient does not experience all, or even most, of these problems. Many patients live enjoyable and productive lives, especially if they receive treatment.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families?
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Methylphenidate or atomoxetine treatment did not increase the risk of suicide attempts or repeated suicide attempts. Long-term methylphenidate treatment was associated with a lower risk for repeated suicide attempts among men”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Huang et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“But people with ADHD had twice the rate of suicide, twice the rate of death by homicide, and a 30% greater rate of death from unintentional injury”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2019c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“A study of over 53,000 U.S. children from the National Survey of Children’s Health found that those with ADHD were 2.4 times as likely to engage in bullying”
- Also stated in: § Emotional and Social Impairment · plain
“A more recent study of some 64,000 children using the same database confirmed this finding, reporting that those with ADHD were 2.8 times more likely to engage in bullying”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Emotional and Social Impairment
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Emotional and Social Impairment · plain
In the paper
“A Danish study of almost two million people found ADHD is associated with a small risk for premature death, mostly due to accidents. When ADHD was accompanied by other psychiatric and substance use disorder, the chances of premature death increased”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Premature Death and Suicide
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dalsgaard et al., 2015b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of seven studies with over 5,000 youths and their parents reported large impairments in the quality of life of youths with ADHD relative to typically developing peers, regardless of whether evaluated by the youths themselves or by their parents. Physical functioning was only moderately impaired, but emotional functioning and social functioning was strongly impaired. School”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Quality of Life
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lee et al., 2016 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study of the Danish population using nationwide registers found that, compared with other youth, those diagnosed with ADHD were more than twice as likely to be convicted of criminal offenses and were three times as likely to be incarcerated. After adjusting for other risk factors, those with ADHD were 60% more likely to have been convicted of a crime, and 70% more likely to have been incarcer”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Crime and Delinquency
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mohr-Jensen et al., 2019 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A systematic review of 19 U.S. studies of hundreds of thousands of people found that ADHD was associated with overall national annual costs from $143 to $266 billion, mostly associated with adults ($105 to $194 billion). Costs borne by family members of people with ADHD ranged from $33 - $43 billion”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Doshi et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A systematic review of seven European studies of hundreds of thousands of participants estimated total ADHD-related costs in the Netherlands as €9,860 to €14,483 per patient per year, with annual national costs more than €1 billion”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Le et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Males with ADHD had a 38% lower risk of crashes in months when receiving ADHD medication compared with months when not receiving medication, and females a 42% lower risk in months when receiving ADHD medication. About a fifth of crashes would have been avoided if they had been on medication throughout the period of the study”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chang et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Those who never had ADHD had average annual healthcare costs of €304. Those in remission had double the cost, and those with persistent ADHD over triple the cost”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Du Rietz et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelationaln = 445,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis found that methylphenidate (13 studies, over 2,200 adults) and lisdexamfetamine (five studies, over 2,300 adults) led to small-to-moderate reductions in symptoms of emotional dysregulation; for atomoxetine (three studies, 237 adults) the reductions were small”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lenzi et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another meta-analysis, covering six RCTs with 253 participants, reported that methylphenidate strongly reduced adult ADHD symptoms, with higher doses resulting in greater improvement”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Faraone et al., 2004 source
boosteddirectn = 253- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study with over 7,000 workers in ten nations found that those with ADHD had an average of 22 annual days of lost role performance compared with those without ADHD”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites de Graaf et al., 2008 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Using Danish registers, a nationwide population study of over 675,000 youths between the ages of 7 and 18 found that youths with ADHD were 3.7 times as likely to be reported as victims of sexual crimes than normally developing controls. After adjusting for covariates, such as parental violence, parental inpatient mental illness, parental suicidal behavior or alcohol abuse, parental long-term un”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Impact of ADHD on Patients and Families? > Other
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Christoffersen, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of nine studies with over 1,300 participants found stimulants to be highly effective in reducing aggression, oppositional behavior, and conduct problems in youth with ADHD (with and without oppositional defiant disorder) and conduct disorder, as measured by teachers, and moderately effective as measured by parents”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pringsheim et al., 2015 source
plaindirectn = 1,300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative to controls, and summing net direct health costs and net losses from lower income and employment, the yearly average cost per individual with ADHD came to just over €16,000. Including additional social transfers, the total rose to just over €23,000.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Jennum et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelationaln = 83,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Using the National Health Insurance Service claims data for the population aged 19 years or younger in South Korea (69,353 diagnosed with ADHD), the total annual economic burden due to ADHD was estimated to be $47.55 million”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hong et al., 2020 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Short-term use of ADHD medications was associated with a 30% reduction in sexually transmitted infections, and long-term use with a 40% reduction, though these reductions were only among males”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2018a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 18,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A Danish cohort study of over 700,000 people, including 4,557 with ADHD, found that among teenagers with ADHD, stimulant treatment was associated with a decrease in rates of injuries (30% for ten-year olds and 40% for twelve-year olds)”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Dalsgaard et al., 2015a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“After adjusting for relevant variables, it found a 60% lower risk of suicide in those using methylphenidate for 3 months to half a year, and a 70% reduction among those using methylphenidate for more than half a year”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Liang et al., 2018b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of 19 parallel group trials with over 1,600 participants, found methylphenidate produced moderate to large improvements in teacher-rated ADHD symptoms, teacher-rated behavior and parent-rated quality of life. There was no evidence of serious adverse events, and just a slightly elevated risk of non-serious side effects”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Storebø et al., 2015 source
plaindirectn = 1,600- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using Swedish national registers, a study of over 17,000 people with ADHD found that medication for ADHD was associated with a greater than 50% reduction in the risk of serious transport accidents among males but not females. Over 40% of crashes by male patients would have been avoided if they had been receiving treatment during the entire period”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chang et al., 2014b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 17,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A network meta-analysis found stimulants to be highly effective in reducing the symptoms of ADHD. Compared with placebo, as rated by clinicians, amphetamines were associated with large improvements in all age groups (youths 6 studies with 2179 participants, adults 5 studies with 1521 participants), methylphenidate with large improvements in youths (9 studies, 2677 participants) and moderate ones”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cortese et al., 2018a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A review of the costs of child, youth and adult ADHD in Australia estimated the total annual costs to be over $20 billion Australian dollars, or $25,000 per person with ADHD.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What is the Economic Burden of ADHD?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Australian ADHD Professionals Association, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Children treated with stimulants may show delays in expected height gains averaging two centimeters over one or two years. These sometimes attenuate over time and often reverse when treatment is stopped (Faraone et al., 2008).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Adverse Effects of ADHD Medications
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Faraone et al., 2008 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The two subtypes of ADHD exhibited very similar associations. Both had significant associations with unhealthy diets.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Supplements, Diet, and Exercise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are multiple genetic and environmental risk factors that accumulate in various combinations to cause ADHD.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Both were more likely to be eating foods high in added sugar and neglecting fruits and vegetables while eating more meat and fats.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Supplements, Diet, and Exercise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ADHD is a chronic disorder in which developmentally inappropriate symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity lead to impairments in many aspects of living.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, the association with unhealthy eating habits was weaker, and the association with consumption of foods high in added sugar became statistically insignificant (Li et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Supplements, Diet, and Exercise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Non-medication treatments are available but, compared with medications, are less effective for reducing inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis of ten studies (300 children) found exercise was associated with a moderate reduction in ADHD symptoms, but had no significant effect after adjusting for publication bias (Vysniauske et al., 2020).”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Supplements, Diet, and Exercise
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Vysniauske et al., 2020 source
plaincorrelationaln = 300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“After adjusting for degree of relatedness of twins (whether monozygotic or dizygotic) and controlling for the other ADHD subtype, the associations remained statistically significant for inattention, but diminished to negligible levels or became statistically nonsignificant for hyperactivity/impulsivity.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Supplements, Diet, and Exercise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Li et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These risk factors lead to subtle changes in multiple brain networks and in the cognitive, motivational, and emotional processes they control.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several medications are safe and effective for treating ADHD and for preventing many adverse outcomes.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many decades of research have led to a method of diagnosing ADHD that is highly valid as a predictor of treatment response, family history of ADHD, many clinical features, measures of brain structure and function, and adverse outcomes.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The disorder, which starts in childhood or early adolescence and is more common in boys than girls, affects 5.9% of youth and 2.8% of adults worldwide.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: ADHD affects 5.9% of youth and 2.8% of adults worldwide.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“People diagnosed with ADHD have an elevated risk for school failure, antisocial behavior, other psychiatric problems, somatic disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, accidental injuries, and premature death, including attempted and completed suicide.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these and other gaps in our knowledge about ADHD, nearly two and a half centuries after the first textbook description of an ADHD-like syndrome, the statements about ADHD which we have curated, make us confident that the contemporary diagnosis of the disorder is a valid and useful category that can be used around the world to improve the lives of the many people who suffer from the”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
ADHD affects 5.9% of youth and 2.8% of adults worldwide.
“The disorder, which starts in childhood or early adolescence and is more common in boys than girls, affects 5.9% of youth and 2.8% of adults worldwide.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ADHD costs society hundreds of billions of dollars each year.
“As a result, ADHD costs society hundreds of billions of dollars each year.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most research about ADHD is based on Caucasian and East Asian samples.
“Because most research about ADHD is based on Caucasian and East Asian samples, we must be cautious in generalizing our assertions to other groups.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Far more research pertains to males than females.
“In addition, far more research pertains to males than females.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While psychostimulants are the mainstay of ADHD treatment, multi-modal treatment has been shown to improve treatment effects [21,22].”
From A Female-Specific Treatment Group for ADHD—Description of the Programme and Qualitative Analysis of First Experiences (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Evidence from twin studies consistently demonstrates a robust genetic contribution to ADHD, with heritability estimates of approximately 74%”
From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Prematurity, low birth weight, and perinatal hypoxia have also been linked to subsequent ADHD, suggesting vulnerability due to subtle neural injury during critical periods of maturation”
From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When untreated, ADHD in adults is associated with significant psychological and societal burden and a heightened risk of psychiatric comorbidities such as mood disorders, anxiety, and substance use [58].”
From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ADHD is a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders, and people presenting with substance use disorders are at increased risk of ADHD (Groenman et al., 2013; van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen et al., 2012; see also Faraone et al., 2021; Ozgen et al., 2020).”
From The Australian evidence-based clinical practice guideline for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (2023) · cites this paper as Faraone et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the most replicated cognitive difference is a more variable response style reflected in increased intra-subject reaction time variability (RTV) (12–17)”
From Differential effects of a single dose of Lisdexamfetamine and Guanfacine on cognitive function in children with ADHD (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Increased RTV in particular is the most replicated finding in individuals with ADHD compared to TD (12, 14, 16, 17); it has frequently been related to excessively slow RTs in individuals with ADHD (14) and is associated with ADHD diagnosis and symptoms (14, 15), with some considering it to underlie behavioral inattention in ADHD (16, 60).”
From Differential effects of a single dose of Lisdexamfetamine and Guanfacine on cognitive function in children with ADHD (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The findings of improved RT and CV under lisdexamfetamine relative to guanfacine and placebo and in particular the deterioration of CV under guanfacine relative to placebo are highly relevant because slower and in particular more variable processing speed are among the most consistent findings in the cognitive literature of ADHD (4, 5, 12, 13, 15–17).”
From Differential effects of a single dose of Lisdexamfetamine and Guanfacine on cognitive function in children with ADHD (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The etiology of ADHD is most accurately conceptualized not as the consequence of a single etiological source but as a multifactorial neurodevelopmental condition arising from the interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental influences (G×E).”
From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“however, meanwhile, it is mostly conceptualized as a neurodevelopmental disorder with early onset that can persist into adulthood with both psychopathological symptoms and functional impairments (Faraone et al. 2021).”
From ADHD and associated psychopathology in older adults in a German community sample (2023) · cites this paper as Faraone et al. 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ADHD, as with other psychiatric disorders, is not easy to diagnose. In this sense, their diagnosis has been criticized because it is not based on a biological testing, and it has been considered subjective [14].”
From Molecular Characterisation of the Mechanism of Action of Stimulant Drugs Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate on ADHD Neurobiology: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These conditions frequently co-occur with ADHD,3–7”
In the citing paper
“This sex/gender bias has been found to be more pronounced in childhood than in adulthood in autism, tic disorders and ADHD14,19,69–71, and varies for different subtypes of these conditions14,72.”
From Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Methods
“We required meta-analyses to report data from five or more studies or 2,000 or more participants.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Symptoms: Results from Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
“Another meta-analysis, combining four studies with 216 youths, found mixed amphetamine salts to be slightly more effective at reducing ADHD symptoms than methylphenidate (Faraone et al., 2002).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
“among teenagers with ADHD, stimulant treatment was associated with a decrease in rates of injuries”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Medications are Safe and Effective for Treating ADHD? > Effects of Medications on Impairments Associated with ADHD: Results from Naturalistic Studies
“30% for ten-year olds and 40% for twelve-year olds”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Methods
“For treatment studies, we excluded results of meta-analyses including comparisons of treatments with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls.”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > Which Non-Medication Treatments are Safe and Effective for ADHD? > Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies
“In another meta-analysis of 160 patients with adult ADHD, CBT led to large to moderate improvements compared with waiting list controls.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
“A meta-analysis found no significant effect of three classes of air pollutants”
§ The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder > What causes ADHD? > Environmental Correlates of ADHD: Exposure to Toxicants
“particulate matter (six studies, over 51,000 persons) and nitrogen oxides (five studies, over 51,000 persons)”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_3055 · Cited by 4,182
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
Eisfeld, J. (2014) · TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1215/23289252-2399740 · Cited by 3,570
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Siegel, L. J., & Fletcher‐Janzen, E. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese0728 · Cited by 3,438
Ellis, P. D. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761676 · Cited by 2,461
FARAONE, S. V., BIEDERMAN, J., & MICK, E. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170500471x · Cited by 2,267 · cited 4×
“794 17 In adolescence and young adulthood, many individuals with a history of childhood ADHD continue to be impaired by the disorder, although they often show reduced hyperactivity and impulsivity while retaining symptoms of inattention (Faraone et al., 2006).”
InfluentialSelf-citationGenetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2711 · Cited by 2,263
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Still, 1902, The Goulstonian lectures on some abnormal physical conditions in children. Lecture 1, Lancet, 1008–0102, 1163
- Still, 1902, The Goulstonian lectures on some abnormal psychical conditions in children. Lecture II, Lancet, 1, 1077
- Still, 1902, The Goulstonian lectures on some abnormal psychical conditions in children. Lecture III, Lancet, 1, 1163
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,518
Ortuño-Miró, S., Molina‐Rodríguez, S., Belmonte, C., & Ibáñez-Ballesteros, J. (2023) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/acad2b · Cited by 19
Denyer, H., Deng, Q., Adanijo, A., Asherson, P., Bilbow, A., Folarin, A., Groom, M., Hollis, C., Wykes, T., Dobson, R., et al. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/44126 · Cited by 12
“ADHD is diagnosed based on impairing levels of inattentive, hyperactive, and impulsive behaviors [2], but most adolescents and adults with ADHD present with additional co-occurring mental health problems manifesting in anxiety, depression, and poor sleep [1,3,4].”
BackgroundSelf-citationZaehle, T., & Krauel, K. (2021) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.03.001 · Cited by 17
Mendonca, F., Sudo, F. K., Santiago‐Bravo, G., Oliveira, N., Assunção, N., Rodrigues, F. D. C., Soares, R., Calil, V., Bernardes, G., Erthal, P., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737357 · Cited by 20
“Validated instruments for assessing cognitive changes in older Brazilian population were applied, including: (1) the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), an estimate of global cognitive function (23, 24); (2) the Rey Auditory verbal-Learning Test (RAVLT), a measure of verbal episodic memory (25, 26); (3) the Block De…”
MethodSelf-citationBozhilova, N. S., Kuntsi, J., Rubia, K., Asherson, P. J., & Michelini, G. (2022) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103068 · Cited by 15
“ADHD affects 7% of children and 2.8% of adults worldwide (Faraone et al., 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSingh, A. D., Balasundaram, M. K., & Singh, A. (2022) · Journal of Central Nervous System Disease · doi:10.1177/11795735221092522 · Cited by 16
“DSM-5 further divides ADHD into three distinguished presentations, that is, inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive, or combined.(8)”
Francés, L., Caules, J., Ruiz, A., Soler, C. V., Amaia Hervas, G., Fernández, A., Rodríguez-Quiroga, A., & Quintero, J. (2023) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-023-03844-2 · Cited by 19
Romero-Ayuso, D., del Pino-González, A., Torres-Jiménez, A., Juan-González, J., Celdrán, F. J., Franchella, M. C., Ortega-López, N., Triviño-Juárez, J. M., Garach-Gómez, A., Arrabal-Fernández, L., et al. (2024) · Children · doi:10.3390/children11080986 · Cited by 20
“These difficulties can persistently and severely affect behavior, with a prevalence of approximately 5.9% among children and adolescents [2].”
BackgroundInfluentialAdamo, N., Singh, S. P., Bölte, S., Coghill, D., Newcorn, J. H., Parlatini, V., Purper‐Ouakil, D., Rausch, J., Rohde, L. A., Santosh, P., et al. (2024) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.14036 · Cited by 16
“Also, despite evidence showing that available interventions may moderate the adverse consequences (Faraone et al., 2021), the use of ADHD medications declines considerably during the transition from adolescence to adulthood for those previously treated (McCarthy et al., 2012; Newlove-Delgado, Ford,…”
Self-citationDecreased impulsiveness and MEG normalization after AI-digital therapy in ADHD children: a RCT
Shpakivska‐Bilán, D., Giglioli, I. A. C., Cuesta, P., Cañadas, E., de Ramón, I., Maestú, F., Alda, J. A., Ramos‐Quiroga, J. A., Herrera, J. A., Puentes, A. A., et al. (2025) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-024-00111-9 · Cited by 16
“The program utilizes advanced technologies, including arti fi cial intelligence and neuropsychological principles, to tailor cognitive training exercises according to the speci fi c needs of each child (for more detail, see Supplementary Materials 1 and 2).”
Self-citationZhao, C., Xu, Y., Li, R., Li, H., & Zhang, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1624485 · Cited by 23
Perera, B., McCarthy, J. M., & Courtenay, K. (2022) · BJPsych Advances · doi:10.1192/bja.2022.23 · Cited by 15
“Even though there are no large studies evaluating the bene fi ts of treatment in people with intellectual disability, evidence overwhelmingly supports it (Perera 2018, 2021; Faraone 2021).”
BackgroundGarcia‐Argibay, M., Du Rietz, E., Hartman, C. A., Lichtenstein, P., Chang, Z., Fava, C., Cortese, S., & Larsson, H. (2022) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1930 · Cited by 16
“Attention ‐ deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neuro-developmental condition that has been estimated to affect approximately 3%–7% of the school ‐ age population (Faraone et al., 2021).”
InfluentialSelf-citationChaparro, X. D. L. M. C. (2022) · Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes · doi:10.1016/j.rmclc.2022.08.001 · Cited by 33
Schein, J. R., Cloutier, M., Gauthier‐Loiselle, M., Bungay, R., Guérin, A., & Childress, A. C. (2022) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-022-02329-5 · Cited by 15
“However, there is a paucity of comprehensive reports on the reasons underlying different types of treatment changes and the rate of complications experienced by patients treated with prescription ADHD medications in the US [16].”
BackgroundAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Across the Spectrum
Majarwitz, D., & Perumareddi, P. (2023) · Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice · doi:10.1016/j.pop.2022.10.004 · Cited by 16
Pujalte, G. G. A., Narducci, D. M., Smith, M. S., King, R. L., Logan, K., Callender, S. S., Liebman, C., Kane, S. F., Israel, M., Wolf, S. F., et al. (2023) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000001152 · Cited by 17
Bonthrone, A. F., Green, D., Morgan, A. T., Mankad, K., Clark, C. A., & Liegeois, F. J. (2023) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15745 · Cited by 18
“51 Interestingly, deficits in executive functioning and processing speed have been identified in other developmental disorders that co-occur with DCD. 52,53 Information processing and executive function deficits may explain over-lapping behavioural phenotypes with other developmental disorders.”
BackgroundThe Risk of Methylphenidate Pharmacotherapy for Adults with ADHD
Bieś, R., Fojcik, J., Warchala, A., Trędzbor, B., Krysta, K., Piekarska-Bugiel, K., & Krzystanek, M. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16091292 · Cited by 16
“Untreated ADHD carries substantial lifelong costs for adults, resulting in challenges related Pharmaceuticals 2023 , 16 , 1292 2 of 12 to personal relationships, professional endeavors, and academic pursuits [7–9]. injuries [7–9].”
Brancati, G. E., Acierno, D., Barbuti, M., Elefante, C., Gemignani, S., Raia, A., & Perugi, G. (2023) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2023.2263645 · Cited by 16
Montse Corrales, F., García-González, S., Vanesa Richarte, B., Fadeuilhe, C., Daigre, C., Garcia-Gea, E., & Ramos‐Quiroga, J. A. (2023) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115642 · Cited by 19
Self-citationBölte, S., Alehagen, L., Black, M. H., Hasslinger, J., Wessman, E., Remnélius, K. L., Marschik, P. B., D’Arcy, E., Seidel, A., Girdler, S. J., et al. (2024) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15865 · Cited by 19
“1 Despite its defining symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity, among other diagnostic criteria, individuals with ADHD vary widely in their functioning profiles, that is, how their activities and participation unfold from an interplay between their individual characteristics and…”
Self-citationGolimstok, Á., Básalo, M. J. G., Majul, M., Berríos, W., Rugiero, M. F., Fernández, M. C., & Eichel, R. (2024) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2024.04.005 · Cited by 17
Advances in the etiology and neuroimaging of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Shen, F., & Zhou, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1400468 · Cited by 21
Lowe, C. T., Bath, A. C., Callahan, B. L., & Climie, E. A. (2024) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547241261826 · Cited by 18
“…inattention, hyperactivity, or impulsivity that interferes with functioning or development, affecting 2.5% to 4.4% of the adult population, and up to 26.7% of outpatient psychiatric patients (Adamis et al., 2022; American Psychiatric Association, 2022; Faraone et al., 2021; Kessler et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhy is ADHD so difficult to diagnose in older adults?
Goodman, D. W., Cortese, S., & Faraone, S. V. (2024) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2024.2385932 · Cited by 17
“While international guidelines for ADHD do not recommend routine echocardiograms in children or adults, it’s important to recognize that these recommendations were not based on information about older adults with or without cardiac illness [26–28].”
Self-citationFroude, A. M., Fawcett, E. J., Coles, A. R. L., Drakes, D. H., Harris, N., & Fawcett, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.050 · Cited by 22
French, B., & Cassidy, S. (2024) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2024.0085 · Cited by 24
Li, Y., He, Y., Wang, Y., He, J., Li, M., Wang, W.-Q., Wu, Z., Xu, Y.-J., He, W., Dou, Y.-L., et al. (2025) · World Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s12519-025-00890-x · Cited by 15
“Brain structural abnormalities associated with ADHD, such as reduced cortical surface area and brain volume, disrupt brain function and result in executive dysfunction [4, 5].”
Self-citationLi, L., Chang, Z., Sun, J., Jangmo, A., Zhang, L., Andersson, L. M., Werner‐Kiechle, T., Ahnemark, E., D'Onofrio, B. M., & Larsson, H. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6815 · Cited by 14
Self-citationBryant, A., Schlesinger, H., Sideri, A., Holmes, J., Buitelaar, J. K., & Meiser‐Stedman, R. (2022) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-022-02004-8 · Cited by 16
“Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by persistent inat-tention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity which affects approximately 5% of children worldwide [1–3].”
BackgroundSelf-citationRichmond, S., Kirk, H., Gaunson, T., Bennett, M. L., Bellgrove, M. A., & Cornish, K. M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055385 · Cited by 17
Self-citationMusella, K. E., & Weyandt, L. L. (2022) · Applied Neuropsychology Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2022.2119142 · Cited by 15
Köder, F., Sharma, C., Cameron, S., & Garraffa, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057501 · Cited by 15
“Given that ADHD is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and also present in the adult population (Polanczyk et al., 2007; Faraone et al., 2021), understanding this disparity should be an urgent pursuit.”
BackgroundEffectiveness of CO-OP Approach for Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review
Madieu, E., Gagné-Trudel, S., Thérriault, P.-Y., & Cantin, N. (2023) · Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation · doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100260 · Cited by 16
Leffa, D. T., Caye, A., Belangero, S. I., Gadelha, A., Pan, P. M., Salum, G. A., & Rohde, L. A. (2023) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579423000366 · Cited by 17
Self-citationJylkkä, J., Ritakallio, L., Merzon, L., Kangas, S., Kliegel, M., Zuber, S., Hering, A., Laine, M., & Salmi, J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36351-6 · Cited by 12
“Following the earlier child version of EPELI7,41, the main dependent variables were: (1) Total score (correctly performed subtasks), (2) Task efficacy (percentage of relevant actions out of all actions excluding clicks on the waypoints that enable moving around in the environment; ‘relevant’ means actions that contrib…”
MethodDentz, A., Martin-Söelch, C., Fahim, C., Torsello, A., Parent, V., Ponsioen, A., Guay, M., Bioulac, S., Clément, C., Bader, M., et al. (2024) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2023.04.010 · Cited by 20
Kelly, C. A., Kelly, C., & Taylor, R. (2024) · European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences · doi:10.24018/ejmed.2024.6.1.2033 · Cited by 19
“Obesity is also associated with ADHD [75] as are type 2 diabetes and multiple other metabolic complications [76].”
BackgroundFrick, M. A., Brandt, A., Hellund, S., & Grimell, J. (2025) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547251318484 · Cited by 15
“A large proportion of adolescents with ADHD receive pharmacological treatments, although the effects are varying and often limited (Faraone et al., 2021).”
Bonati, M. R., Scarpellini, F., Cartabia, M., Zanetti, M., & on behalf of the Lombardy ADHD Group (2021) · Children · doi:10.3390/children8070598 · Cited by 14
“9% of children and persists into adulthood for two-thirds of them [1,2], with great impairments in academic achievement and work [3].”
BackgroundMethodBlomberg, R., Capusan, A. J., Signoret, C., Danielsson, H., & Rönnberg, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.771711 · Cited by 17
Lilja, M. M., Sandblom, E., Lichtenstein, P., Serlachius, E., Hellner, C., Bhagia, J., & Halldner, L. (2022) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-022-09424-2 · Cited by 14
“ADHD is associated with lower quality of life [50].”
BackgroundBrikell, I., Wimberley, T., Albiñana, C., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Agerbo, E., Børglum, A. D., Demontis, D., Schork, A. J., LaBianca, S., Werge, T. M., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.21111105 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBuitelaar, J. K., van de Loo-Neus, G. H. H., Hennissen, L., Greven, C. U., Hoekstra, P. J., Nagy, P., Ramos‐Quiroga, J. A., Rosenthal, É., Kabir, S., Man, K. K. C., et al. (2022) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.09.001 · Cited by 14
Self-citationZheng, P., Yuan, K., Liu, S., Xue, Z., Ma, P., Teo, E. W., & Chang, J. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.05.037 · Cited by 14
Liang, O. S., & Yang, C. C. (2022) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.014 · Cited by 13
Puyjarinet, F., Madramany, P., Autexier, A., Madieu, E., Nesensohn, J., & Biotteau, M. (2022) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2022.2114503 · Cited by 14
“…with attention-de fi cit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a neurodevelopmental condition that a ff ects 5 – 7% of children worldwide (Brossard-Racine et al., 2008; Brossard-Racine et al., 2015; Faraone et al., 2021; Graham et al., 2016 for a meta-analysis; Polanczyk et al., 2014; Willcutt, 2012).”
BackgroundDayan, H., Khoury‐Kassabri, M., & Pollak, Y. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12101336 · Cited by 12
“ADHD is a common neurodevelopmental condition defined by symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, accompanied by academic, occupational, or social functional impairment [1].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPonnou, S., & Thomé, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.957242 · Cited by 13
“This second hypothesis is often rejected by proponents of a biological and a neuro-essentialist view of ADHD (65), but several factors such as school demands (36) or the rise of social inequalities (66) may have contributed to an increase in the frequency of ADHD symptoms in the last 20 years.”
BackgroundWang, Y., Liu, J., Wu, Y., Wei, Y., Xie, H.-J., Zhang, T., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.987093 · Cited by 13
“Neuropsychologists have found that there are performance defects in psychological processes with ADHD (3).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDehnavi, A. Z., Zhang‐James, Y., Draytsel, D. Y., Carguello, B., Faraone, S. V., & Weinstock, R. S. (2023) · Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.jcte.2023.100318 · Cited by 12
“Although psychiatric comorbidities among patients with ADHD have been very well documented [4], few large systematic studies had assessed the link between ADHD and somatic comorbidities [5].”
BackgroundSelf-citationImpulsivity as key bridge symptoms in cross‐sectional and longitudinal networks of ADHD and ODD
Bansal, P. S., Goh, P. K., Southward, M. W., Sizemore, Y. J., & Martel, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13863 · Cited by 19
Qu, S., Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Yi, W., Zhou, H., Zhang, X., Zhu, Q., Wang, Y., Yang, Q., Jiang, L., et al. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02314-6 · Cited by 14
“These drugs, originally approved to treat ADHD [13], produce the same paradoxical effects in humans as well as in rodent and fl y models [14 – 17].”
Self-citationThe ability to maintain rhythm is predictive of ADHD diagnosis and profile
Gustafsson, P., Kjell, K., Cundari, M., Larsson, M., Edbladh, J., Madison, G., Kazakova, O., & Rasmussen, A. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05401-8 · Cited by 18
“The societal burden of ADHD is high [8].”
BackgroundHoward, S. L., Beaudin, S. A., Strupp, B. J., & Smith, D. R. (2024) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2024.107337 · Cited by 13
Danielson, M. L., Claussen, A. H., Arifkhanova, A., Gonzalez, M. G., & Surman, C. B. H. (2024) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547241238899 · Cited by 15
“Treatments such as medication and behavioral therapy can improve symptoms and functioning; stimulant medications may most effectively reduce symptoms in adults and children older than 6 years, though non-stimulant medications also show effectiveness (Faraone et al., 2021; Wolraich et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMlodnicka, A., Mansolf, M. A., Chandran, A., Aris, I. M., Calub, C. A., Ahmad, S. I., Shapiro, A. L. B., Cochran, D., Restrepo, B., Schmidt, R. J., et al. (2024) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579424000695 · Cited by 17
“It may be possible that increased internalizing and externalizing behaviors are secondary to challenges associated with ADHD, including peer exclusion, poor self-esteem, poor academic performance, and family conflicts (Faraone et al., 2021; Johnston & Chronis-Tuscano, 2015).”
Self-citationHaan, E., Krebs, K., Võsa, U., Brikell, I., Larsson, H., & Lehto, K. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291724000606 · Cited by 15
Self-citationPathway from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to suicide/self-harm
Lin, P., Wu, W. T., Azasu, E., & Wong, T. Y. (2024) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115936 · Cited by 14
Elliott, J., Buchanan, K., & Bayes, S. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101825 · Cited by 13
Tusa, B. S., Alati, R., Ayano, G., Betts, K. S., Weldesenbet, A. B., & Dachew, B. A. (2024) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104261 · Cited by 13
Kogel, A., Ladopoulos, T., Schwake, C., et al. (2024) · Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000200325 · Cited by 13
“30 However, no data on the association of ADHD and MOGAD are available so far.”
Cheng, N., Bryce, S., Takagi, M., Pert, A., Rattray, A., Fisher, E., Lai, M., Geljic, M., Youn, S., Wood, S. J., et al. (2024) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbae228 · Cited by 16
“4,83 However, consistent with the literature and the reported prevalence of ADHD in the general population, we observed wide variability in prevalence rates, 2,3 suggesting that the overall pooled prevalence should be interpreted with caution.”
Asrar, B., Ali, N. S., Ali, I., & Naveed, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-82302-0 · Cited by 15
Seminars in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Chitsabesan, P., Lavis, P., Northover, G., Nijjar, R., Mahadevan, D., Doherty, J. L., MBE, A. S. A., Davidson, Z., McFadyen, A., Holland, J., et al. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009110266 · Cited by 13
Safar, K., Vandewouw, M. M., Pang, E. W., de Villa, K., Crosbie, J., Schachar, R. J., Iaboni, A., Georgiades, S., Nicolson, R., Kelley, E. A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826527 · Cited by 13
Brault, M., Degroote, E., & Houtte, M. V. (2022) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593221093492 · Cited by 16
“The most discussed ADHD conceptualizations are grouped under the neurobiological perspectives, where ADHD is considered to be a chronic medical condition characterized by a neurodevelopmental disorder (Faraone et al., 2021).”
BackgroundWallin, K., Lundell, I. W., Hanberger, L., Alehagen, S., & Hultsjö, S. (2022) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01867-y · Cited by 21
“Within the research field of ADHD, there is still a lack of studies including women [30].”
BackgroundÇakir, A., Doğru, H., & Laloğlu, E. (2023) · Indian Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s13312-023-2812-1 · Cited by 13
Santiago, N. A., He, B., Howard, S. L., Beaudin, S. A., Strupp, B. J., & Smith, D. R. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.16.549215 · Cited by 14
“…disruption of epigenetic and catecholaminergic system gene methylation state, specifically, we found that the epigenetic modulators DNA methyltransferase (1, 3a, and 3b) and histone deacetylase (4 and 7) are hypermethylated, while histone deacetylase 3 is hypomethylated (Supplemental Sheet 1).”
BackgroundJendreizik, L. T., Hautmann, C., von Wirth, E., Dose, C., Thöne, A.-K., Treier, A.-K., Banaschewski, T., Becker, K., Brandeis, D., Geissler, J., et al. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00529-z · Cited by 12
“It is assumed that genetic and environmental risk factors accumulate to cause both of these externalizing disorders [2, 21].”
BackgroundSelf-citationChoi, H., Hong, J., Kang, H. G., Park, M.-H., Ha, S., Lee, J., Yoon, S., Kim, D., Park, Y. R., & Cheon, K.-A. A. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01547-9 · Cited by 13
Yegencik, B., Bell, B. T., & Deniz, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1611145 · Cited by 24
Johnson, S., Lim, E., Jacoby, P. A., Faraone, S. V., Su, B. M., Solmi, M., Forrest, B., Furfaro, B., von Klier, K., Downs, J. A., et al. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-03178-8 · Cited by 17
Self-citationLee, K. S., Xiao, J., Luo, J., Leibenluft, E., Liew, Z., & Tseng, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.803891 · Cited by 16
“The proportion of boys and girls in the high irritability but low ADHD group were comparable to typically developing peers, [χ2 (1) = 0.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNavarro, S. R., Alarcón‐Arcos, S., & Prieto, I. T. (2022) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13506 · Cited by 12
de Vries, S., & Verheij, R. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948942 · Cited by 11
“Beyond these economic consequences, the quality of life of children diagnosed with ADHD is impaired, often also still in adulthood (Di Lorenzo et al., 2021; Faraone et al., 2021).”
BackgroundChen, L., Jeong, J., Simpkins, B., & Ferrara, E. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/43439 · Cited by 12
“The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement has listed 8 distresses associated with ADHD, including quality of life, emotional and social impairment, premature death and suicide, educational underachievement, and more [4].”
Golm, D., & Brandt, V. C. (2023) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579423000457 · Cited by 14
Takahashi, N., Nishimura, T., Harada, T., Okumura, A., Iwabuchi, T., Rahman, M. S., Kuwabara, H., Takagai, S., Usui, N., Makinodan, M., et al. (2023) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2023.100630 · Cited by 12
Self-citationZhang, D., Johnstone, S. J., Sauce, B., Arns, M., Sun, L., & Jiang, H. (2023) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110802 · Cited by 14
Li, D., Wei, Y., Yang, Y.-L., et al. (2023) · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1728 · Cited by 12
Healthcare pathways and practitioners’ knowledge about ADHD in children
Willig, T.-N., Dajon, M., Assathiany, R., Brun, L., Fourneret, P., Massé, M., Monge, A., Piollet, A., Thiollier, M. C., Cortese, S., et al. (2023) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2023.07.005 · Cited by 13
Self-citationGaléra, C., Collet, O. A., Orri, M., Navarro, M. C., Castel, L., Galesne, C., Reed, C., Brandt, V. C., Larsson, H., Boivin, M., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00226-2 · Cited by 13
Self-citationZhang, Y., Yin, L., You, C., Liu, C., Dong, P., Xu, X., & Zhang, K. (2023) · Drugs in R&D · doi:10.1007/s40268-023-00445-3 · Cited by 13
“Although a large number of studies and meta-analyses have confirmed the effectiveness of both medications, inconsistencies were found in their response rates and safety profiles, and there is wide variability between studies [6, 10–15].”
BackgroundNordby, E. S., Guribye, F., Schønning, V., Andersen, S. L., Kuntsi, J., & Lundervold, A. J. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53931 · Cited by 16
“Beyond these core symptoms, ADHD is accompanied by an array of co-occurring symptoms and difficulties, both somatic and psychological, which can further complicate and amplify the challenges associated with the diagnosis [5].”
BackgroundSelf-citationD’Anna, C., Carlevaro, F., Magno, F., Vagnetti, R., Limone, P., & Magistro, D. (2024) · Children · doi:10.3390/children11070757 · Cited by 17
“Children with ADHD who struggle with motor skills often face challenges completing tasks that require coordinated movements [7,8].”
BackgroundLiu, L., Chen, D., Huang, F., Jia, T., Cheng, W., Pan, M., Zhao, M., Bu, X., Liao, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14900 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWestman, E., Prami, T., Kallio, A., Iso‐Mustajärvi, I., Jukka, J., Raittinen, P. V. H., Korhonen, M. J., Puustjärvi, A., & Leppämäki, S. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70253 · Cited by 17
Disrupted Attention to Other’s Eyes is Linked to Symptoms of ADHD in Childhood
Frick, M. A., Brocki, K. C., Henriksson, L. H., & Kleberg, J. L. (2022) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-022-01316-9 · Cited by 12
“Previous studies have shown that both types of treatment can reduce core symptoms of ADHD, as well as associated comorbidity [54].”
BackgroundAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and musical behaviour: The significance of context
Wilde, E. M., & Welch, G. F. (2022) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/03057356221081163 · Cited by 12
“, 2014; Thapar & Cooper, 2015), as well as elevated risk of drug and alcohol abuse, accidental injury and premature death (Faraone et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe scientific integrity of ADHD: A critical examination of the underpinning theoretical constructs
Mills, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1062484 · Cited by 16
“Although space precludes a discussion of competing interests, a list at the end of The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement (3) is testament to the extent of pharmaceutical involvement.”
BackgroundInfluentialBrown, A., Pinto, D., Burgart, K., Zvilichovsky, Y., & Golumbic, E. Z. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1731-22.2023 · Cited by 13
Mental-health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in adults with neurodevelopmental disorders
Shakeshaft, A., Blakey, R., Kwong, A. S. F., Riglin, L., Smith, G. D., Stergiakouli, E., Tilling, K. M., & Thapar, A. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.01.029 · Cited by 14
Self-citationZhu, F., Kuang, D., Zhu, X., Xu, B., Lin, S., Chen, J., Bi, X., Li, Z., Yang, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.119495 · Cited by 16
Self-citationSaccani, M. S., Ursumando, L., Vara, S. D., Lazzaro, G., Varuzza, C., Vicari, S., & Menghini, D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19116411 · Cited by 15
“However, findings documenting atypical sleep and reduced sleep quality in children with ADHD are controversial [3,14,15].”
BackgroundEinziger, T., & Berger, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.927411 · Cited by 12
“, who found that an elevated level of risk for ADHD was predicted by the temperament profiles of (1) high fear, high anger, and low self-regulation; (2) low fear and low self-regulation; and (3) moderated by anger and moderated activity (98); However, as far as we know, this approach was not used to identify sensitivi…”
BackgroundInfluentialEinziger, T., Devor, T., Ben‐Shachar, M. S., Arazi, A., Dinstein, I., Klein, C., Auerbach, J. G., & Berger, A. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.007 · Cited by 11
“Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD 1 ) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder, with a worldwide prevalence estimation of 5.9% of school-age children (Faraone et al., 2021; Polanczyk et al., 2014) and about 2.8% of adults (Fayyad et al., 2017; Simon et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialState of the Evidence for Use of Psychotropic Medications in School-Age Youth
Shahidullah, J. D., Roberts, H. J., Parkhurst, J. T., Ballard, R., Mautone, J. A., & Carlson, J. S. (2023) · Children · doi:10.3390/children10091454 · Cited by 11
“Clinicians should recognize that the presentation of hyperactive and impulsive symptoms are associated with a range of negative outcomes, including peer rejection, aggression, risky behaviors, and accidental injuries [39].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Faraone, S. V., Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., Zheng, Y., Biederman, J., Bellgrove, M. A., Newcorn, J. H., Gignac, M., Al Saud, N. M., Manor, I., Rohde, L. A., Yang, L., Cortese, S., Almagor, D., Stein, M. A., Albatti, T. H., Aljoudi, H. F., Alqahtani, M. M. J., Asherson, P., Atwoli, L., Bölte, S., Buitelaar, J. K., Crunelle, C. L., Daley, D., Dalsgaard, S., Döpfner, M., Espinet (on behalf of CADDRA), S., Fitzgerald, M., Franke, B., Gerlach, M., Haavik, J., Hartman, C. A., Hartung, C. M., Hinshaw, S. P., Hoekstra, P. J., Hollis, C., Kollins, S. H., Sandra Kooij, J. J., Kuntsi, J., Larsson, H., Li, T., Liu, J., Merzon, E., Mattingly, G., Mattos, P., McCarthy, S., Mikami, A. Y., Molina, B. S. G., Nigg, J. T., Purper-Ouakil, D., Omigbodun, O. O., Polanczyk, G. V., Pollak, Y., Poulton, A. S., Rajkumar, R. P., Reding, A., Reif, A., Rubia, K., Rucklidge, J., Romanos, M., Ramos-Quiroga, J. A., Schellekens, A., Scheres, A., Schoeman, R., Schweitzer, J. B., Shah, H., Solanto, M. V., Sonuga-Barke, E., Soutullo, C., Steinhausen, H.-C., Swanson, J. M., Thapar, A., Tripp, G., van de Glind, G., van den Brink, W., Van der Oord, S., Venter, A., Vitiello, B., Walitza, S., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- Harvard University (US)
- Monash University (AU)
- American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (US)
- Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
- European Psychiatric Association (FR)
- Peking University (CN)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- Saudi ADHD Society (SA)
- King's College London (GB)
- Moi University (KE)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Örebro University (SE)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- University College Cork (IE)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of Ibadan (NG)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
- University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Topiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital (IN)
- Northwell Health (US)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- University of the Free State (ZA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Faraone, Stephen V.
- ORCID
- Faraone, Stephen V.
- Banaschewski, Tobias
- Coghill, David
- Zheng, Yi
- Biederman, Joseph
- Bellgrove, Mark A.
- Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
- Gignac, Martin
- Manor, Iris
- Yang, Li
- Cortese, Samuele
- Almagor, Doron
- Stein, Mark A.
- Alqahtani, Mohammed M.J.
- Asherson, Philip
- Atwoli, Lukoye
- Bölte, Sven
- Buitelaar, Jan K.
- Crunelle, Cleo L.
- Daley, David
- Dalsgaard, Søren
- Döpfner, Manfred
- Espinet (on behalf of CADDRA), Stacey
- Fitzgerald, Michael
- Franke, Barbara
- Haavik, Jan
- Hartman, Catharina A.
- Hartung, Cynthia M.
- Hinshaw, Stephen P.
- Hoekstra, Pieter J.
- Hollis, Chris
- Kollins, Scott H.
- Kuntsi, Jonna
- Larsson, Henrik
- Li, Tingyu
- Merzon, Eugene
- Mattingly, Gregory
- Mattos, Paulo
- McCarthy, Suzanne
- Mikami, Amori Yee
- Molina, Brooke S.G.
- Nigg, Joel T.
- Purper-Ouakil, Diane
- Omigbodun, Olayinka O.
- Polanczyk, Guilherme V.
- Pollak, Yehuda
- Poulton, Alison S.
- Rajkumar, Ravi Philip
- Reding, Andrew
- Reif, Andreas
- Rubia, Katya
- Rucklidge, Julia
- Romanos, Marcel
- Ramos-Quiroga, J. Antoni
- Schellekens, Arnt
- Scheres, Anouk
- Schoeman, Renata
- Schweitzer, Julie B.
- Shah, Henal
- Solanto, Mary V.
- Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
- Soutullo, César
- Swanson, James M.
- Thapar, Anita
- Tripp, Gail
- Van der Oord, Saskia
- Venter, Andre
- Vitiello, Benedetto
- Walitza, Susanne
- Wang, Yufeng
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 128
- Pages
- 789-818
- ISSN
- 0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8328933
- OpenAlex
- W3128855809
- Cited by
- 1,545
- References
- 361
- Citations by year
- 2026: 373 · 2025: 364 · 2024: 328 · 2023: 270 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 34
- FWCI
- 144.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Brandeis University
- Wellcome Trust (204895/Z/16/Z)
- Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte
- Action Medical Research
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200263, 14/23/17)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Lundbeckfonden (R248‐2017‐2003)
- Universität Zürich
- Peking University (SZSM201612036)
- Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973Program, 2014CB846100)
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- National Institutes of Health (TL1TR001861)
- Medical Research Council (MR/P012647/1)
- Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM 201612036)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH110043, U01MH109536, R01MH101519, R37MH059105, R01MH091068, R01MH113855)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES026993)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD087091, P50HD093074)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, publication bias, prevalence, treatment outcomes, course of disorder, ADHD etiology, stigma, misconceptions
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Publication Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review