Cited by 31Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychological mechanisms underpinning change in intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety-related disorders: New insights for translational research

Open access
Morriss, Jayne·2025·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), the tendency to find uncertainty negative, is a fundamental transdiagnostic dimension across anxiety-related disorders. Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in both clinical and experimental research on the role of IU in the maintenance and treatment of anxiety-related disorders. However, there has been a lack of integration of research findings from a mechanistic perspective, which has slowed progress in translational research. This review seeks to fill this gap by synthesising the clinical (e.g. randomised controlled trials) and experimental (e.g. lab-based) literature on the psychological mechanisms that drive change in IU across anxiety-related disorders. The review highlighted that: (1) cognitive restructuring, supported by mechanisms such as cognitive appraisal, modify IU-related cognitions, (2) behavioural exposures, supported by mechanisms such as inhibitory learning, alter IU-related cognitions and physiological arousal, and (3) mindfulness techniques underpinned by mechanisms such as attentional monitoring, decentering, and acceptance, change IU-related cognitions. Across the different therapeutic techniques reviewed, there was a lack of evidence for how different mechanisms change IU-related emotions and behaviours. Directions for further research include directly comparing the effectiveness of different mechanisms that produce change in IU across anxiety disorders and other mental health disorders, and examining the specificity of change in IU over other anxious traits. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for future translational research efforts to build upon maximising existing treatment interventions and/or to develop novel treatment interventions to target dispositional IU and situational uncertainty-related distress in anxiety-related disorders and beyond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106138

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IU is a transdiagnostic risk factor for youth mental health problems.

    “IU is a transdiagnostic risk factor for youth mental health problems (Morriss, 2025).”

    From A single session online training reduces intolerance of uncertainty and improves mental health in emerging adults. (2025) · cites this paper as Morriss, 2025

    The review describes IU as transdiagnostic across several disorders and says it is relevant to developing populations (section 6). But it says the literature has primarily focused on adults and does not establish IU as a transdiagnostic risk factor specifically for youth mental health problems. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intolerance of uncertainty is a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental health problems including depression and anxiety.

    “IU, reacting more negatively to uncertainty (Freeston, Rhéaume, Letarte, Dugas, & Ladouceur, 1994), is a transdiagnostic risk factor for mental health problems including depression and anxiety (Mahoney & McEvoy, 2012; Morriss, 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morriss, J.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Morriss, Jayne
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-06
Volume
173
Pages
106138
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409291323
Cited by
28
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety-related disorders, cognitive restructuring, cognitive appraisal, inhibitory learning, physiological arousal, mindfulness, attention monitoring, decentering, acceptance, transdiagnostic mechanisms, translational research
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Uncertainty, Translational Research, Biomedical, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review