Cited by 97Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsCircadian rhythm and melatoninMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Effects of a constant light environment on hippocampal neurogenesis and memory in mice

Fujioka, Aya, Fujioka, Takashi, Tsuruta, Ryosuke, Izumi, Tomonori, Kasaoka, Shunji, Maekawa, Tsuyoshi·2011·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Because the environmental light-dark cycle is a key factor involved in modulating circadian rhythm in mammals, disruption of cyclic light conditions has a variety of effects on physiology and behavior. In the hippocampus, neurogenesis, which continues to occur throughout life, has been reported to exhibit circadian variation under cyclic light-dark conditions. In the present study, we examined whether a constant light environment affected hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Half of the animals were exposed to continuous light conditions (L/L group), while the other half remained under normal cyclic light-dark conditions (L/D group). In the L/L group, the number of BrdU-labeled cells (proliferating cells) and that of BrdU and class III β-tubulin double-labeled cells (newborn neurons) in the granule cell layer were significantly decreased compared with the L/D group. Because hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in memory and learning, we also investigated the effects on performance in water maze tasks to assess spatial learning. Exposure to L/L treatment for 3 weeks impaired spatial learning task performance, although there was no difference in the open field behaviors between the groups. These findings demonstrate that the constant light conditions impaired hippocampal neurogenesis as well as cognitive performance, and suggest an important role for the cyclic light-dark environment in appropriate maintenance of the hippocampal system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujioka, A., Fujioka, T., Tsuruta, R., Izumi, T., Kasaoka, S., & Maekawa, T.
Affiliations
Yamaguchi University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Fujioka, Aya
  • Fujioka, Takashi
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
488
Issue
1
Pages
41-44
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976162844
Cited by
97
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
constant light, hippocampal neurogenesis, circadian rhythm, light-dark cycle, spatial learning, memory impairment, BrdU labeling, TUBB3, granular layer, newborn neurons, water maze
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Exploratory Behavior, Light, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Time Factors, Tubulin, Maze Learning, Dentate Gyrus, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review