Cited by 109Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forward and backward connections in the brain: A DCM study of functional asymmetries

Open access

Abstract

In this paper, we provide evidence for functional asymmetries in forward and backward connections that define hierarchical architectures in the brain. We exploit the fact that modulatory or nonlinear influences of one neuronal system on another (i.e., effective connectivity) entail coupling between different frequencies. Functional asymmetry in forward and backward connections was addressed by comparing dynamic causal models of MEG responses induced by visual processing of normal and scrambled faces. We compared models with and without nonlinear (between-frequency) coupling in both forward and backward connections. Bayesian model comparison indicated that the best model had nonlinear forward and backward connections. Using the best model we then quantified frequency-specific causal influences mediating observed spectral responses. We found a striking asymmetry between forward and backward connections; in which high (gamma) frequencies in higher cortical areas suppressed low (alpha) frequencies in lower areas. This suppression was significantly greater than the homologous coupling in the forward connections. Furthermore, exactly the asymmetry was observed when we examined face-selective coupling (i.e., coupling under faces minus scrambled faces). These results highlight the importance of nonlinear coupling among brain regions and point to a functional asymmetry between forward and backward connections in the human brain that is consistent with anatomical and physiological evidence from animal studies. This asymmetry is also consistent with functional architectures implied by theories of perceptual inference in the brain, based on hierarchical generative models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.041

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C. C., Henson, R. N., Stephan, K. E., Kilner, J. M., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Chen, C.C.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
453-462
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120182026
Cited by
109
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
functional asymmetry, effective connectivity, nonlinear coupling, face processing, MEG, perceptual inference, generative models, Bayesian model selection
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review