Cited by 148Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Choice, difficulty, and confidence in the brain

Rolls, Edmund T., Grabenhorst, Fabian, Deco, Gustavo·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

To provide a neurobiological basis for understanding decision-making and decision confidence, we describe and analyze a neuronal spiking attractor-based model of decision-making that makes predictions about synaptic and neuronal activity, the fMRI BOLD response, and behavioral choice as a function of the easiness of the decision, and thus decision confidence. The spiking network model predicts probabilistic decision-making with faster and larger neuronal responses on easy versus difficult choices, that is as the discriminability DeltaI between the choices increases, and these and the synaptic currents in turn predict larger BOLD responses as the discriminability increases. Confidence, which increases with discriminability, thus emerges from the firing rates of the decision-making neurons in the choice attractor network. In two fMRI studies, we confirm these predictions by showing that brain areas such as medial prefrontal cortex area 10 implicated in choice decision-making between pleasant stimuli have BOLD activations linearly related to the easiness of both olfactory and warm pleasantness choices. Further, this signature is not found in orbitofrontal cortex areas that represent on a continuous scale the value of the stimuli, but are not implicated in the choice itself. This provides a unifying and fundamental approach to decision-making and decision confidence, and to how spiking-related noise in the brain affects choice, confidence, synaptic and neuronal activity, and fMRI signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.073

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have reported neural correlates of decision confidence in brain regions associated with a value representation, for example firing rates in rat orbitofrontal cortex and fMRI signal in human vmPFC show graded changes as perceptual decisions become more difficult.

    “Previous studies have reported neural correlates of decision confidence in brain regions associated with a value representation. For example, firing rates in rat orbitofrontal cortex7 and fMRI signal in human vmPFC8 show graded changes as perceptual decisions become more difficult.”

    From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

  • The response to confidence in vmPFC is not driven by a categorical response to errors.

    “Note that we additionally tested and confirmed that the response to confidence is not driven by a categorical response to errors8 (see Supplementary Figure 3).”

    From Confidence in value-based choice (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Previous studies have relied on an object-level framework where confidence is equated with the information that governs the choice process.

    “Previous studies have relied on an object-level framework, where confidence is equated with the information that governs the choice process [ 30 – 32 ].”

    From Metacognition: computation, biology and function (2012) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolls, E. T., Grabenhorst, F., & Deco, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Rolls, Edmund T.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
694-706
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040199946
Cited by
148
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
decision-making, decision confidence, spiking neuron models, discriminability, task difficulty, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, BOLD signal, synaptic noise, neuronal firing rate
MeSH terms
Brain, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hot Temperature, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Oxygen, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reward, Smell, Synapses, N-Methylaspartate, Neural Networks, Computer, Prefrontal Cortex, alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid, Electrophysiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review