Cited by 130Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Vive les differences! Individual variation in neural mechanisms of executive control

Open access
Braver, Todd S, Cole, Michael W, Yarkoni, Tal·2010·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Investigations of individual differences have become increasingly important in the cognitive neuroscience of executive control. For instance, individual variation in lateral prefrontal cortex function (and that of associated regions) has recently been used to identify contributions of executive control processes to a number of domains, including working memory capacity, anxiety, reward/motivation, and emotion regulation. However, the origins of such individual differences remain poorly understood. Recent progress toward identifying the genetic and environmental sources of variation in neural traits, in combination with progress in identifying the causal relationships between neural and cognitive processes, will be essential for developing a mechanistic understanding of executive control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.002

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Substantial evidence has accrued that individual differences in successful adaptive psychological styles are central to human development, functioning, social cohesion, and health outcomes.

    “Although consensus remains elusive on defining specific personality or cognitive "types" (18,19), substantial evidence has accrued that individual differences in successful adaptive psychological styles are central to human development, functioning, social cohesion, and health outcomes (20)(21)(22)(23).”

    From Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD (2012) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Abstract links individual differences in personality, emotion processing, and cognitive ability to executive control, and the Emotion regulation section discusses differences in regulation success and depression. These passages support a narrower claim about cognitive and emotional functioning, but do not establish that adaptive psychological styles are central to human development, social cohesion, or health outcomes broadly. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar arguments have been made for COMT and working memory, with an evolutionary trade-off between efficient working memory updating (val) and robust working memory maintenance (met).

    “Similar arguments have been made with regard to COMT and working memory, with an evolutionary trade-off between efficient working memory updating (val) and robust working memory maintenance (met) (22).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braver, T. S., Cole, M. W., & Yarkoni, T.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Braver, Todd S
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
242-250
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973316969
Cited by
130
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066078)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F32NR012081)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
executive function, individual differences, lateral prefrontal cortex, neural mechanisms, working memory capacity, anxiety, reward and motivation, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Motivation, Genetic Variation, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review